16 1/2 Artar for 11x14

Discussion in 'Ultra Large Format Cameras and Accessories' started by Curt, Oct 29, 2007.

  1. Curt

    Curt Subscriber

    Messages:
    4,560
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Location:
    Pacific Nort
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Has anyone tried or used or uses a 16 1/2 inch RD Artar on an 11x14 inch ULF?:D I'm going to start working on my 11x14 and have the Artar and a 14 inch Kodak Commercial Ektar as my only large lenses. I do have the TR and could use a single element such as 21 or 29, or do I absolutely need a Dagor for perfection in contact printing?
     
  2. smieglitz

    smieglitz Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,941
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Location:
    Climax, Michigan
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    I'm not sure the Artar will cover at infinity. I think you need a 19" for that. The image circle needs to be 17.8" to cover.

    There may be more information in this current thread:
    http://www.apug.org/forums/forum187/43863-big-art-ar-s-coverage.html

    According to Tracy Storer there:
     
  3. JG Motamedi

    JG Motamedi Member

    Messages:
    472
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    The 16 1/2" will cover, but the corners will be soft. They might be ok stopped way down. When I first got my 11x14 the only lens I had which would come close to covering was a 14" RD Artar. It illuminated the whole plate at but even at f90 the corners were complete mush.

    The 14" Ektar will cover with respectable corners, but with only modest movements before they go soft.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 29, 2007
  4. jamie young

    jamie young Member

    Messages:
    402
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Location:
    Syracuse, NY
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    My 14" RD artar got a lttle soft at the corners on 8x10 unless it was dead center. Illuminated circle was small too.
    I've used my 19" artar on 8x20, with some movement, and it works well.
    Jamie
     
  5. Craig Roberts

    Craig Roberts Member

    Messages:
    17
    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Location:
    New Mexico
    Shooter:
    8x10 Format
    16-1/2 Artar

    Curt, I put my 16-1/2 inch artar on my 12x20 to see what coverage it would have. It clearly illuminated an 11x14 area with room to spare. I cannot state what the image quality would be at the corners on film. This is one of those things where you may consider trying it and judging the quality for yourself. I have discovered that many lenses cover more area than the stated "specs" but there is some degradation of teh mage. For some subjects (sky) it is not noticable. Give it a try and find out for yourself how well it will perform. Good luck.
    Craig
     
  6. Scott Peters

    Scott Peters Member

    Messages:
    360
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Location:
    Scottsdale,
    Shooter:
    ULarge Format
    I regularly use my 16 1/2 artar on my 7x17...corners are great too. It is a relativelyinexpensive lens as well. You should try it. Given the price you should be able to sell it reasonably quickly if it does not live up to your expectations.