1970s Pentax Advertisements

Discussion in 'Antiques and Collecting' started by Steve Roberts, Apr 22, 2008.

  1. Steve Roberts

    Steve Roberts Member

    Messages:
    1,148
    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Location:
    Near Tavisto
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Hi All,

    As part of my general interest in photography, I accumulate (I wouldn't go so far as to say "collect"!) Pentax 35mm SLRs up to and including the K series. Along with that interest, I also keep a watchful eye out for Pentax advertising material, which I usually laminate and stick on the walls of the darkroom. A series of ads I've always admired is that showing the Pentaxes belonging to various noteworthy individuals. Thus we have a shot of a battered Pentax SV captioned "Ken Russell's Pentax" and at the bottom of the page the terrific slogan "Your Pentax becomes a part of you." Other notables' Pentaxes include David Bailey, Spike Milligan, Terence Conran, Henry Fox Talbot (no, I'm kidding on the last one!)

    My question is whether anyone knows whether the cameras did indeed belong to those individuals in the truest, literal sense? Alternatively, did Pentax roll up at David Bailey's house one day, present him with a Pentax and say "Now we've given you your own Pentax, can we take a shot of it?" Thirdly, was it (as my suspicious nature leads me to believe) just a blatant con and the people named never actually even set eyes on the cameras depicted?

    It was a well-conceived advertising campaign but I would love to know the truth thirty plus years later! All comments and thoughts gratefully received!

    Best wishes,

    Steve
     
  2. BradS

    BradS Subscriber

    Messages:
    4,219
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Location:
    S.F. Bay Area
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    Welll, I don't have any evidence or facts either way but, I suspect that they were "half truths". That is to say, that those photogographers mentioned in the ads did in fact own and use the type but, not the exact one pictured in the ad.
     
  3. pentaxuser

    pentaxuser Subscriber

    Messages:
    8,195
    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Location:
    Daventry, No
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Maybe in the 70s there was less risk of trouble with celebs if you used half truths although Bailey as a pro might have had something to say about it! Much more recently David Suchet( He of Poirot et alia fame) featured in the Nikon user magazine. He was/is a genuine Nikon user. Film user then maybe the "other" now. I don't know. I think he accepted an honorary position such as President. So, based on this, it seems likely that they did use Pentaxes or were happy to become users once presented with one, free of charge.

    Pentax were a force to be reckoned with then even if it did lose its way much later compared to Nikon and Canon.

    pentaxuser
     
  4. mcfactor

    mcfactor Member

    Messages:
    183
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Shooter:
    Med. Format RF
    It's chronologically impossible (according to wikipedia) for Henry Fox Talbot to have owned a Pentax. The Pentax company was created in 1919 in Japan and Talbot died in 1877. Its misleading to say the least to use his name in an advertisement for a japanese camera that was made almost 100 years after his death.
     
  5. pentaxuser

    pentaxuser Subscriber

    Messages:
    8,195
    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Location:
    Daventry, No
    Shooter:
    35mm
    What!!! I got my pentax strictly on the basis that Fox Talbot had used one. I've been to his house and there is even a pentax in his museum along with other good cameras. I thought that explained why some of the shots on the walls were much better than the earlier one of a window. Very grainy it was. Probably a box camera and chinese film, I thought.:D

    You can't trust anybody these days. :mad:

    Ah! I have looked again and the OP has in fact admitted that he was just kidding about Fox Talbot being a pentax user:D

    Just to let everybody know that I am a pentax user. I kid you not

    pentaxuser
     
  6. MattKing

    MattKing Subscriber

    Messages:
    16,799
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Location:
    Delta, BC, Canada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Is there a(n) "I'm pulling your leg" smiley? If not, there should be :smile:.

    Matt
     
  7. juan

    juan Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,745
    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Location:
    St. Simons I
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    The usual deal in the music business, even in the early 70s, was for a musician to sign an endorsement deal with a manufacturer. The musician would receive free instruments as part of the deal, and the manufacturer would advertise the musician as a user complete with photos of him playing the instruments. I'd suspect, though I don't know, that there was a similar deal with photographers.
    juan
     
  8. jd callow

    jd callow Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    8,003
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Location:
    Milan
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    This is the way it often works. Kate jackson did ads for Linclon. She did own or was given a Mark and did test it against a benz and others as the ads stated. What the ads didn't state was that she also owned a benz.
     
  9. Steve Roberts

    Steve Roberts Member

    Messages:
    1,148
    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Location:
    Near Tavisto
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Thanks for all the thoughts on this everyone.

    Steve