4x5 portraits

Discussion in 'Portraiture' started by Douglas Benton, Jun 2, 2012.

  1. Douglas Benton

    Douglas Benton Member

    Messages:
    11
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    After years of digital I'm shooting 4x5 film again for fun.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 2, 2012
  2. M.A.Longmore

    M.A.Longmore Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,886
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Location:
    New York
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    .
    Welcome Home Douglas !

    Ron
    .
     
  3. Sirius Glass

    Sirius Glass Subscriber

    Messages:
    20,702
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Location:
    Southern California
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Welcome to APUG!
     
  4. Douglas Benton

    Douglas Benton Member

    Messages:
    11
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Thank you much. I have indeed been made to feel welcome. This is a great forum.
    Doug
     
  5. benjiboy

    benjiboy Subscriber

    Messages:
    8,687
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2005
    Location:
    U.K.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Welcome to A.P.U.G Douglas, you just don't get that sort of quality and tonality you get with 4X5 with digital.
     
  6. Douglas Benton

    Douglas Benton Member

    Messages:
    11
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    That may be true eventually, but right now, for me, I have a lot more control and I know what I'm doing with digital. I started shooting digital professionally and stopped shooting film in about 2002. Prior to that I shot 2 1/4 and 4x5, a little 8x10, mostly E6. Even though I was shooting it every day, I didn't process and print my own work, so it was really a lot longer since I have done much in the dark room.

    Even though I liked digital, my decision to shoot it was not really a personal choice. The market I was working in, pretty much demanded it. There were a couple of hold outs who continued to shoot film for a while, but they were losing clients who wanted the immediacy of film. Art directors had always been willing to wait for their images to run through the lab, but once they had the taste, they often wanted to take the files with them at the end of the shoot. It was a huge shift in what and how we did things. I actually started creating better images than I did when I shot film. It wasn't that digital was better, but that I had more control. I don't have that control with film yet with the processing and scanning. I'm shooting film that's more than a decade out of date, and developing in my bathroom, and I'm just figuring out how to scan.
    If I am the end user, It's all about the image. I don't necessarily care how the image was created. However, as the creator, the process is a big part of it.


    I'm having a great time rediscovering the love for the process (most of the time).
    Doug
     
  7. h.v.

    h.v. Member

    Messages:
    186
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2011
    Location:
    Alberta, Can
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I hope you enjoy your return to film. Digital really has transformed life over the past decade or decade-and-a-half, I very much agree. This isn't even limited to photography, but really much of our technology and culture has changed as a result of digital technology, particularly the internet.

    The portraits you made are just stunning. They both have a very certain magical quality to it that I've never really seen before (I'm not very well read on large format, though, I just know 35mm and 120). I hope to see more of your portraits on here!
     
  8. kbrede

    kbrede Member

    Messages:
    273
    Joined:
    May 23, 2012
    Location:
    Nebraska
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Welcome to APUG! Nice portraits. :smile:
     
  9. TheFlyingCamera

    TheFlyingCamera Membership Council Council

    Messages:
    9,548
    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Some of the "you don't get that with digital" factor is the lenses available for larger formats - especially when you get into the bigger-than-4x5 formats. Very little can hold a candle (in a modern-ish lens) to a Kodak Commercial Ektar for a portrait lens, something you'd never be able to take advantage of with digital in any currently available format (well, maybe a BetterLight 4x5 scanning back, but you get the idea). And a Verito, Vesta, Vitax or Heliar? Fuggedaboutit!

    Welcome back to analog large format. And don't stop at just 4x5! I shot 4x5 for a while, then size creep kicked in, and now I'm mostly shooting 6.5x8.5 (yes you can get film for that) and 5x7, but I have a 14x17 in my arsenal. Nothing quite like a life-size headshot, contact printed.
     
  10. Mainecoonmaniac

    Mainecoonmaniac Subscriber

    Messages:
    4,038
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Nice work! Keep shooting 4x5 film!
     
  11. markbarendt

    markbarendt Subscriber

    Messages:
    7,704
    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Beaverton, OR
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Welcome, fun stuff there.
     
  12. Richard S. (rich815)

    Richard S. (rich815) Subscriber

    Messages:
    4,954
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2003
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Really nice portraits!
     
  13. gus.

    gus. Subscriber

    Messages:
    56
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    *apologies for resurrecting an old thread*

    Hey folks, I'm not very familiar with medium format gear. In the photo of the girl with the glasses I'm having trouble understanding the focal point. It's her eyes, sure, but then her shoulder is out of focus yet her lower sweater remains focused. How does that work?
     
  14. polyglot

    polyglot Member

    Messages:
    3,470
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Location:
    South Austra
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Her eyes are well forward of her shoulder; she may even be doing the turtle move (to prevent double-chins; I try to do it in every frontal portrait I'm in). Shoulders are probably a good 7 to 10cm behind the eyes, so well out of focus. Arms come forward a bit and back into the plane of focus.

    Secondly, these are 4x5 portraits (not medium format), which means they were probably shot with a view camera. Such things allow you to control the plane of focus by tilting the lens, which allows (for example) a photo with the eyes in focus but everything else (below the nose and above the fringe) dramatically blurred. Not the case here, but it's an option.
     
  15. MattKing

    MattKing Subscriber

    Messages:
    17,174
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Location:
    Delta, BC, Canada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Her eyes are essentially the same distance from the camera as the lower part of her sweater.

    Her shoulder is farther from the camera, so it is out of focus.

    The only role played by the film format is that medium or large format will have less inherent depth of field then 35mm or smaller formats, because the lenses used for the larger formats need to have longer focal lengths to achieve the same field of view from the same camera position.

    EDIT: oops, as polyglot mentioned ahead of me, as these are 4x5 portraits there may also be some camera movements involved
     
  16. ScarletBrown

    ScarletBrown Member

    Messages:
    23
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2013
    Location:
    Mississauga,
    Shooter:
    Plastic Cameras
    First of all, i would like to say that your work is so nice and appreciated after a long time. Keep your work spirit as well as you have.