A Conversation with Kodak Alaris

Discussion in 'Industry News' started by RattyMouse, Nov 7, 2013.

  1. RattyMouse

    RattyMouse Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,477
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Location:
    Ann Arbor, M
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
  2. AgX

    AgX Member

    Messages:
    11,899
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2007
    Location:
    Germany
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    To me the most important statement is:

    Though in the whole interview there is no further detail on this. Rather: Business as usual.
     
  3. thegman

    thegman Member

    Messages:
    623
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2010
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Interesting read, the important thing is that their business is film, not 'strategic interests in digital workflows' or other BS. All film users need is a company that wants to make film, without any of the extraneous rubbish that caused Kodak to fail in the first place.
     
  4. AgX

    AgX Member

    Messages:
    11,899
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2007
    Location:
    Germany
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I mean, why would you by factories and and a market share for a declining, without new ideas for it? Well, if it was cheap, then one still could earn profits during the resting time.
    But KPP payed a fortune for those assets.
    It rather seems they took what they still could get before getting nothing.
     
  5. AgX

    AgX Member

    Messages:
    11,899
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2007
    Location:
    Germany
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    KPP bought three components from Kodak: digital documentation, photochemical plants (manufacturing RA-4 paper at the moment) and the product range of still-films. (Alaris does not even own any intellecectual property other than brand names for the latter share.)

    With that RA-4 business they are completely dependent on "strategic interests in digital workflow".
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 7, 2013
  6. RattyMouse

    RattyMouse Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,477
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Location:
    Ann Arbor, M
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Right. Buy Kodak's film business or get nothing. That's the answer to your question.
     
  7. j.c.denton

    j.c.denton Member

    Messages:
    52
    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2012
    Location:
    Germany
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Yeah, thanks for killing E100G as well. Would he loved it even more if it was re-shot on Portra?

    But I will not complain. Its good to hear C-41 is alive and kicking. I like Portra alot, its really nice. For an C-41, that is.

    Christian
     
  8. wy2l

    wy2l Member

    Messages:
    149
    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    All Kodak lies.
     
  9. ntenny

    ntenny Member

    Messages:
    2,283
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Location:
    San Diego, C
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I thought Fiedler's third answer addressed that: They're "starting almost from scratch", without the burden of Kodak's debts or additional business lines, and hopefully with a bit more flexibility to scale production (but I'm speculating about that last bit). As everyone has pointed out for years, Kodak's film business, taken in isolation, was profitable on paper---it seems plausible that KA's first big "new" idea is to run the existing business in a setting where it can turn its profit without all those extra qualifiers.

    I expect that's true as well.

    -NT
     
  10. EdSawyer

    EdSawyer Member

    Messages:
    1,097
    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    he just sounds like a typical marketeering asshat flunky. (lomo? wtf... obviously not a serious film user himself) No new info here. Clearly he has no technical insight. The whole "keep the remaining portfolio" party line is lame. The real reason that is the case is they have neither the talent nor resources to do anything else. They (alaris) couldn't develop a new emulsion if they wanted to. Hopefully EK will continue to do some R&D on film, if even only for their motion picture stuff, as the benefits may flow into the still-photography film products. That's the only hope since alaris is clearly only a bunch of sales hacks. But, at least the film is still available, fortunately. If they (alaris) actually wanted to do something other than pay lip service to their marketeering nonsense, they would start packaging Endura in cut sheets again. They actually have a chance of making that happen as they own the RA-4 plant.
     
  11. Ken Nadvornick

    Ken Nadvornick Subscriber

    Messages:
    5,045
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Location:
    Monroe, WA, USA
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Both fascinating and poignant that in the end the interview devolves back to the same question for Kodak that always ends up getting asked,

    "Can we have our Kodachrome back?"

    It's not that the answer is ever going to change. No, it's just fascinating that the question continues to be asked. And poignant because I don't think EK ever really, really understood in depth what it had created in Kodachrome. Sure, they knew it was a highly profitable (at the time) product line. A technological and engineering (at the time) tour de force. An ongoing (at the time) cash cow. But still and all...

    I don't think they ever really fully grasped the culturally iconic nature of the stuff. The collective emotions behind all of those family portraits. And town portraits. And factory portraits. And WWII portraits. And all of the other billions of portaits that over the generations, collectively, became a powerful de facto national portrait of America.

    It's the vestigial remnants of that iconic nature that result in the question continuing to be asked. Even at this late, late date. And interesting to note is that he still beat around the bush and couldn't bring himself to give the necessary straight answer.

    Which is simply "No."

    Ken
     
  12. donkee

    donkee Member

    Messages:
    147
    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Location:
    Mid Michigan
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Kodak, not much use to me until they bring back at least Ektachrome and Plus-X. I would be very happy if Tech Pan came back too.
     
  13. AgX

    AgX Member

    Messages:
    11,899
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2007
    Location:
    Germany
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    How do you know?
     
  14. Sponsored Ad
  15. TheFlyingCamera

    TheFlyingCamera Membership Council Council

    Messages:
    9,434
    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    We're very fortunate that Fuji still makes transparency film at all. Face it, the market for the stuff is for all intents and purposes dead. What used to sustain it was the commercial studios that shot chromes for reproduction purposes in catalogs, magazines, and other print media. Right now, print media are facing a crisis of their own and are lucky to survive, and digital capture is the means of preference for any and all publications be they in print or online due to the speed of production and transmission. That market is never coming back. Color negative film availability for us consumers (and that's what we are, just consumers, not volume shooters) is sustained at a semi-affordable price only by virtue of the volume of motion picture film stock being produced and consumed by the motion picture industry. Should that decline precipitously, you can kiss C41 goodbye, even if every single APUG member were to go out and buy a thousand rolls of Portra 160 a year.
     
  16. RattyMouse

    RattyMouse Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,477
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Location:
    Ann Arbor, M
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Jeez.....so much hate towards Kodak. Sorry I posted that link guys. I won't do so again.
     
  17. ambaker

    ambaker Subscriber

    Messages:
    670
    Joined:
    May 6, 2011
    Location:
    Missouri, US
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I really don't see anything bad in that interview...

    Seems pretty rational to me to continue with what is working, and then see where you can go next.

    Yes it would be something to see a huge announcement, and a world wide mega buck campaign brining back everything there ever was. And six months later when the whole thing imploded, how much fun then?

    I'm thankful that there is any kind of film future. With time they may sort out a way to make it amazing. And if they do not, well at least somebody tried...

    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
     
  18. bobwysiwyg

    bobwysiwyg Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,623
    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
    Location:
    Ann Arbor, M
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    +1, still a Kodak user and probably will remain so until the last yellow box. :wink:
     
  19. Kevin Caulfield

    Kevin Caulfield Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,385
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Location:
    Melbourne, A
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    The editing is so poor, I find it almost impossible to read.
     
  20. eddie

    eddie Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,973
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2005
    Location:
    Northern Vir
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    What makes you think people can't do "serious" work with lomo?
     
  21. StoneNYC

    StoneNYC Subscriber

    Messages:
    8,200
    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Location:
    Connecticut,
    Shooter:
    8x10 Format
    Whenever I hear LOMO, I just cringe, however when I truly think about it isn't using something like a Petzval lens on purpose to get a weird unfocused area with an interesting look kind of the same thing as what the Lomo guys do?
     
  22. Ken Nadvornick

    Ken Nadvornick Subscriber

    Messages:
    5,045
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Location:
    Monroe, WA, USA
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Whenever I hear LOMO, I think film sales.

    If tanking film sales is the enemy, then the enemy of my enemy is my friend...

    Ken
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 7, 2013
  23. MattKing

    MattKing Subscriber

    Messages:
    16,793
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Location:
    Delta, BC, Canada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Please don't hesitate to post links like this in the future - there are also lots of people here who are cheering for Kodak. It is certainly true that Kodak's circumstances evoke passion.

    On the editing issue, my take on the representative from Alaris is that his first language is not English. I think some of the "choppyness" of what he says comes from that.

    One thing I liked from the conversation is that it is the first explicit reference I have seen to the effect that Alaris has the marketing responsibilities for Kodak chemistry.
     
  24. AgX

    AgX Member

    Messages:
    11,899
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2007
    Location:
    Germany
    Shooter:
    Multi Format

    I very much appreciate you hinting at that interview. And aside confirming their conservative stand towards their portfolio there is is that important remark on marketing.
     
  25. Truzi

    Truzi Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,770
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    There was some incorrect punctuation (and spacing) which is likely the fault of the writer. A few sentences make more sense if you imagine a few commas in opportune places.
     
  26. eddie

    eddie Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,973
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2005
    Location:
    Northern Vir
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I don't understand comments like this. What about it makes you cringe? Have you ever worked with a Holga, or Diana?