The reason I ask is I am looking to cut down on lenses and am considering a 180 to plug the gap between 110 and 300, rather than both 150 & 210. I know my 210 G claron covers 10x8 egde to edge with movement and is pin sharp right in the corners despite the fact that it is not supposed to cover 10x8 at all. Does the 180 f9 fuji have more coverage than listed I wonder...if so it might have much more usable coverage stopped down than the regular symmars/sironars which (other than the big Sironar S and Symmar L) have no better coverage according to the spec (being 260mm ish) The Fuji 180 F9 is listed with 250mm coverage but the Perez/Hevanet test (one sample from the 1970/80s suggests that the edges are not great, only so so. Can anyone comment on how well this covers 5x7 in the real world for someone looking to enlarge (sometimes considerably) rather than contact print, so the edges need to be good? It looks so small and great for backpacking!