Acidifying and De-acidifying paper for platinum printing

Discussion in 'Alternative Processes' started by Davec101, Mar 3, 2012.

  1. Davec101

    Davec101 Member

    Messages:
    896
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Location:
    Cambridge, U
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    Posted this on my blog thought i would put this on here to see what others thought.

    'A common practice by contemporary platinum printers is to acidify certain watercolour/printmaking papers to prevent an acid-base reaction commonly observed when an acid ferric oxalate solution reacts with an alkaline paper surface. The process of acidification is simple and involves soaking the paper in either citric acid or oxalic acid for a certain period of time ranging from 1-15 mins. Usually this not only makes a paper useable for platinum/palladium printing but can lead to a dmax increase of up to .20. Each batch of paper can vary so its important to take regular tests to insure consistent results. Many papers I edition with require acidification and it has become a regular part of my workflow. The process can remove the internal sizing of certain papers and may require the use of a hot press to flatten after the print has dried.

    Recently I came across some notes written on the back of a Penn Platinum print that mentioned the process of deacification, which I had not encounted before. The print entitled ‘Sitting Nude Rear’ shown below was printed in June 1994 on BFK Rives and went through 3 platinum/palladium coatings and exposure cycles. The full details are shown below the print

    120795_669434.jpg

    “SITTING NUDE REAR / (NEW YORK, 1993) [in a box]”; stamped and inscribed verso: “HAND COATED BY / THE PHOTOGRAPHER / IP:”; stamped verso: “Deacidified”; inscribed verso: “RIVES PAPER ON ALUMINUM / MULTIPLE COATING AND PRINTING / 1 [in a circle] PLATINUM-PALLADIUM / 2 [in a circle] PLATINUM-PALLADIUM / 3 [in a circle] PLATINUM-PALLADIUM”; inscribed verso: “3/6”; stamped verso: “PHOTOGRAPH BY IRVING PENN / “Print made June 1994”; stamped and inscribed verso:

    The process of deacification, as the name suggests, would involve removing the acid from a particular paper, this is the opposite of what contemporary platinum/palladium printers are doing today as previously mentioned above. It would be interesting to learn more about this from other printers, I would have thought BFK Rives in 1994 would have been acid free and would require acidification, but it would seem that this is not the case in this instance.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 3, 2012
  2. payral

    payral Member

    Messages:
    382
    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Location:
    France
    Shooter:
    8x10 Format
    Don't you think it could be Deacidified once print made just to bring it to neutral state for long time conservation.
     
  3. Davec101

    Davec101 Member

    Messages:
    896
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Location:
    Cambridge, U
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    I think thats got to be the most likely explanation Philippe. Purhaps he was using one of the modern chelating agents such disodium and tetrasodium Edta as a clearing bath to bring print to a more neutral state and was making note of this on the back to give museum's and conservators etc.. this additional information. I would imagine after three successive coatings and exposure cycles the print would have been in a heavily acidic state and would require quite lengthy deacification. I know from my own research that multi-layered platinum/palladium prints can take significantly more time to clear compleatly when compared to those of a single layer.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 3, 2012
  4. Loris Medici

    Loris Medici Member

    Messages:
    653
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Location:
    Istanbul, Tu
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Ditto. +1 from here...

    P.S. The print, image and the rear are all gorgeous BTW! :smile: