Aus - 4x5" Box of Pro 160S + 400ft of 35mm Vision1 500T

Discussion in '[Classifieds] For Sale' started by Athiril, Mar 7, 2011.

  1. Athiril

    Athiril Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,948
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Location:
    Melbourne, V
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Pro 160S box is 125g, 10 sheets, June 2011.
    $35


    500T 35mm 400ft roll suits 35mm bulk loading - if you cant find someone to remove the remjet for C-41 process - I can do that for you :wink:

    I've got one other can with 300ft left but I think I'll keep that, you got to rewind it onto a spool in the bulk loader in a change bag (what I do), or you can load it directly onto canisters with the spiny handle part stuck in the bottom of the canister, keep your hand over the edges of the reel of film so it doesnt come apart. Tape down the end of the film when done so it stays tight.
    $65

    35 N4740 (1866) EI
    5279 193 3101
    (c) 1996 < ~15 years old.

    Tin is 1.1kg. $13 Express including cost of packaging (about the same as regular for the weight).. but check auspost.com.au! 17.5cmx17.5cmx4cm 1.1kg
     
  2. holmburgers

    holmburgers Member

    Messages:
    4,423
    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Location:
    Rochester NY
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
  3. Athiril

    Athiril Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,948
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Location:
    Melbourne, V
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I've mixed up the ECN-2 recipe following the Kodak publication with also several variations, I havent seen benefit to it v C-41.
     
  4. holmburgers

    holmburgers Member

    Messages:
    4,423
    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Location:
    Rochester NY
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I understand that x-processing it as C-41 compromises its archival stability, but IDK. Just hoping to plug your sale.
     
  5. Athiril

    Athiril Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,948
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Location:
    Melbourne, V
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Iirc it's not archival to begin with right? I dont think stabilisers were part of the ECN-2 process (if I remember), using actual stabiliser on the film then should be better for the long term.
     
  6. holmburgers

    holmburgers Member

    Messages:
    4,423
    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Location:
    Rochester NY
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    As far as I know, it should be just as archival as C-41, when processed in the right stuff. I believe that the print films are less archival, since they are produced in mass quantities for projection. This film though, seeing as it's the original footage shot in the camera, should be as archival as anything or Paramount's gonna want their money back!

    I recall PE having something to say about it.. I mean... the Oracle.