Best 50mm lens for my Nikons

Discussion in '35mm Cameras and Accessories' started by kivis, Aug 11, 2011.

  1. kivis

    kivis Subscriber

    Messages:
    268
    Joined:
    May 21, 2006
    Location:
    South Florid
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Just want the raw truth on the best manual focus 50mm lens I could get for my MF Nikons.
     
  2. CGW

    CGW Member

    Messages:
    2,797
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    The plain vanilla 50/2 AI punches way above its weight on film(or<<gasp>>digital)bodies. For the money, probably at or near the top of the Nikon 50mm heap.
     
  3. kivis

    kivis Subscriber

    Messages:
    268
    Joined:
    May 21, 2006
    Location:
    South Florid
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Bjørn Rørslett likes this batch:

    Normal lenses

    50 mm f/2 Nikkor-H (AI)
    50 mm f/1.8 Nikkor
    58 mm f/1.2 Noct-Nikkor
    50 mm f/1.4 Nikkor (latest versions, including AF-D)
     
  4. Richard S. (rich815)

    Richard S. (rich815) Subscriber

    Messages:
    4,959
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2003
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    As usual "best" is very subjective. Most weenies want the sharpest, most contrasty, fastest lens they can get so they can take photos of their Corvettes using TechPan film stand-developed with Rodinal diluted 1:10,000 for the best acutance. Personally I like the older ones like the 50 mm f/2 Nikkor-H (AI) because of it's moderate contrast because that's what I want in my B&W work.
     
  5. zsas

    zsas Member

    Messages:
    1,961
    Joined:
    May 12, 2011
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
  6. al5256

    al5256 Member

    Messages:
    33
    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Location:
    SW Florida
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Hi,

    I have a few older 50 and 55mm lenses for manual focus bodies.

    50 /1.4 AI, 1977, Dreamy at 1.4, sharpness increases after f/4, very sharp at f/8 and 11.

    50/2 AI, 1979, Sharpness increases when closed down but it is sharp from corner to corner from f/2 to f/11, but never sharp as 50/1.4 AI at f/8.

    50/1.8 AF-D, 2009, plastic made in China, basically this is an AIS lens, dreamy at f/1.8, sharp at f/2 to f/4, very sharp at f/8, this is the sharpest lens I have, however sharpness decreases at the corners compared to 50/2 AI.

    55/3.5 compensating micro Nikkor, non-AI, 1967, extremely sharp macro lens, even not worse than 50/2 at distance. Mine is AI’d by #63 kit.

    55/3.5 PC, micro Nikkor, non-AI, 1974, Very sharp macro lens, can be used as an overall standard lens, and very good at distance.
    Thanks.
     
  7. Colin Corneau

    Colin Corneau Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,871
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2007
    Location:
    Brandon, MB
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Micro-Nikkors (55mm's) are razor sharp if that what constitutes "best" to you.

    If price is what's best, overall quality is just great on a standard 1.8

    1.2 or 1.4's are best if speed is what's "best" to you.

    al5256's comments above are pretty spot on, from my observations.
     
  8. 2F/2F

    2F/2F Member

    Messages:
    8,003
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Location:
    Los Angeles,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Best in what way?
     
  9. Pumalite

    Pumalite Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,078
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Location:
    Here & Now
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    +1
     
  10. semi-ambivalent

    semi-ambivalent Subscriber

    Messages:
    701
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I have a 2.8cm F/3.5 Nikkor-H with most of the coating "cleaned" off the rear element. It is an excellent performer, gives great tones with proper development and is fun to shoot. I get the OP's take on <performance=resolution> but you can always compensate for that, work against it, if that's what you want. But it's nice to have the lp/mm when you really need them. When is that? Who knows. Film choice is a bigger factor here. That and camera shake. And atmospheric turbulence.
     
  11. tkamiya

    tkamiya Member

    Messages:
    4,252
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2009
    Location:
    Central Flor
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    If OP wants manual focus lens, I'd exclude the current 50mm f/1.8D. I have one and focusing this thing manually is not pleasurable. It's focus ring is not dampened so it feels loose and somewhat twitchy. It doesn't have the oily smooth feel of the lens made for manual focusing. It works but not something I enjoy doing.

    We had a rush of what is the "best" <insert product here> threads. I really wish people define what they mean by best and the parameters associated with it. A lot of things in photography is subjective. Price and availability varies quite a bit, too. Without knowing what OP is looking for, it's rather difficult to make recommendations.
     
  12. keithwms

    keithwms Member

    Messages:
    6,073
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2006
    Location:
    Charlottesvi
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    A fine lens, to be sure. My issue with it is that it is several stops slower than the other offerings, which can make manual focusing a real challenge for some.

    ...particularly on the some of the dark- or small- viewfinder dslrs that we won't discuss here :wink: ....

    For ease of focus, I would argue for the 1.2, though I realize that it is beyond many budgets, and I will also admit that it is more of an available-light trick lens than an all 'round value.

    I frequently lament the lack of a normal pancake on my manual focus Nikons. A high quality pancake should be possible now with all the whizbang optical technology out there. There should be a good dslr market for a good pancake too. What's up, Nikon???!
     
  13. CGW

    CGW Member

    Messages:
    2,797
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    My issue with it is that it is several stops slower than the other offerings.

    Er, the difference between f1.4/1.8 and f2 isn't "several" stops...Brightness really isn't an issue at that margin. Those poxy coalpit-dark penta-mirror finders wouldn't brighten much with faster lenses anyway--it's the mag factor that's just as nasty.

    Pancakes? There's always the chipped Nikon 45/2.8 Ai-P for film and FF. They're out there for micro 4/3s but not for Nikon.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 11, 2011
  14. Sponsored Ad
  15. jp498

    jp498 Member

    Messages:
    1,467
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Location:
    Owls Head ME
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I've had a 50/1.2 and thought it was tough to focus, but that was on a f4s with the standard non-split viewfinder. A split viewfinder center would make things a little easier. I mostly relied on the focus indicator LED which was sorta a slow way and not as accurate for close distances at 1.2

    I've also had the 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.4d-af, and 50/1.8d-af.

    The 1.4 and 1.8's that I have flare easily with internal reflections if there are very intense bright spots in the image (like car headlights or floodlights in night photos) Otherwise they are very nice and have smooth bokeh when widish open.

    The 55/3.5 micro is a nice to focus manual lens. It focuses quick and in a short distance as most of the focus scale is for macro use, not normal distance stuff. It doesn't flare as bad, but isn't bright for existing light night/indoor use like the others. It has a very impressionist bokeh (not buttery like a 105/2dc or portrait lens, and not all crazy cubist looking like the 60/2.8d macro) at modest stops like 5.6-11.

    Someone was asking about a pancake.... I have the voigtlander 40/2 sl2 and it's almost a pancake and is fantastic in construction and image quality.
     
  16. kivis

    kivis Subscriber

    Messages:
    268
    Joined:
    May 21, 2006
    Location:
    South Florid
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Anyone tried the Voigtlander 58/1.4? I heard the optics are awesome.
     
  17. keithwms

    keithwms Member

    Messages:
    6,073
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2006
    Location:
    Charlottesvi
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    [snip] ...ah never mind

    Someone thanks you for this nice tip :wink:
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 11, 2011
  18. waynecrider

    waynecrider Member

    Messages:
    2,297
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2003
    Location:
    Floriduh
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I did a bit of reading up on the 50's awhile back and from what i remember the 50 1.4 Ai was the lens to have. It and the AIS go for the same money in the same condition at KEH which is $275 in Ex condition. The optical formula should be the same with a little investigation confirming any differences in case of changes.
     
  19. dynachrome

    dynachrome Member

    Messages:
    1,001
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2006
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I have a number of standard Nikkors in the f/2 to f/1.4 range. Where coating is concerned anything from a C lens onward is very good. As the 50/1.4 manual focus Nikkor line advanced, image quality closer to f/1.4 improved. At f/8 or f/11 I would rather have a 50/1.4 SC or first K version than the later versions. High sharpness at or near wide open is a function of many factors. Is your mirror angle adjusted properly? Is your focusing screen sitting in exactly the right place? Is the infintiy focus of your lens set properly? How is your eyesight? Is your shutter speed high enough? You now have to also contend with sample variation and condition. I respect the 50/1.8 Nikkors and have three of them. Still, I prefer the 50/2 AI, the 50/2 K or even the 50/2 HC. The 55/3.5 Compensating lens is not know for high performance outside of the close-up range. All 55/3.5 Nikkors from the P to the AI perform well at distance and the 55/2.8 manual focus Nikkors are very sharp at all distances. Any of the later 50/2, 50/1.8 or 50/1.4 will give good results if it is in good condition and if it is used properly. When it comes to the 50/1.8 I prefer the first AI version to the later versions. Excellent results can also be obtained from the 45/2.8 GN Nikkors. My GN is a C model.
     
  20. brucemuir

    brucemuir Member

    Messages:
    2,266
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    Location:
    Metro DC are
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    It's better not to obsess over the slight differences.
    They are all good.
    If you need 1.4 and have the chong, go for it.
    I have 2 -f/2 "H"s and they are damn good.
    I also have 3 versions of the 1.4
     
  21. rulnacco

    rulnacco Member

    Messages:
    44
    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Location:
    London, UK
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I settled on a 50/1.8 AIS (the nicer one, with the front element recessed rather deeply within the barrel). I had bought a 50/2 AI from Grey's of Westminster and immediately afterward my local shop (the deceptively named High Street Radio in Croydon) got in a mint 1.8, and the proprietor kindly loaned it to me for a comparison with the F2 version.

    I found the 1.8 slightly but definitely sharper than the F2. It might come down to sample variation--the F2 has a reputation for being quite sharp, and there is some opinion online that it has slightly better bokeh (not something that's terrifically important to me in a fast 50, really). So I swapped the F2 and a bit of cash for the 1.8.

    It's killer sharp, if that's what you're looking for.
     
  22. fstop

    fstop Member

    Messages:
    765
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Shooter:
    35mm
    and speaking of contrast I want the latest, newest lens I can find so it has the most advanced coating on the optics and best manufacture quality.So that means AIS or at least factory AI.
    also means I'm a weenie although I don't shoot B&W anymore, B&W is for luddites

    If you like less contrast and flare on teles then get older lenses, I have a 50mm 1.4 Nikkor S that produces good results under controlled lighting.
     
  23. CGW

    CGW Member

    Messages:
    2,797
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Suffice it to say, there's really not a "dog" among 50mm Nikkors, at least none of the ones I have(and that's too many)embarrasses me.
     
  24. parkpy

    parkpy Member

    Messages:
    96
    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Shooter:
    35mm
    really, OP?

    buy them all, and sell the ones you don't like.

    50mm is the FL I dislike most. Maybe because I'm not capable of making interest pictures with the lens:-/
     
  25. bblhed

    bblhed Member

    Messages:
    601
    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2010
    Location:
    North Americ
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Any Nikkor 50mm that you can get your hands on will produce great photos, the best one for you is another story.

    I would get the 50 1.8f again without thinking about it, I have that and the 50 1.4f and I only use the 1.4 because the 1.8 is an Auto Focus lens as far as I'm concerned both are excellent lenses that can take far better photos than I can. There are differences in the way the photos from these lenses look, but for me it does not matter. You may prefer the look of one of these lenses over another.
     
  26. Brett_Jurgens

    Brett_Jurgens Member

    Messages:
    68
    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    Location:
    Nebraska
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I have multiple Nikon 50's- 1.8 versions, 1.4 versions ai and af, but I always seem to reach for the 50 f/2 that I learned on. Nice contrast and sharp. And they can be found cheap.