Build 35mm or add 645?

Discussion in '35mm Cameras and Accessories' started by casualfunk, Feb 15, 2005.

  1. casualfunk

    casualfunk Member

    Messages:
    6
    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Here's my current gear list..

    Canon EOS 3 (love it)
    Canon EOS 1000 (backup, rarely used)
    Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM (with hood)
    Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM (with hood)
    Canon EF 28-90mm f/4-5.6 USM (used only for the occasional wide shot)
    Holga 120S (i have yet to put a roll through it)

    I'm looking to spend about $600.00 USD on some new gear, and I'm a bit undecided at the moment. I've narrowed my choices down to three options..

    Option 1-
    Canon PB-E2
    Canon Speedlite 550EX

    Option 2-
    Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L USM

    Option 3-
    Mamiya 645E
    Mamiya-Sekor C 80mm f/2.8 N

    I usually shoot fine art from sprawling landscapes down to macros, and my commercial work consists primarily of fashion (I use a fellow photographer's RZ kit for this), product/advertising work, and the occasional portrait shoot. I enjoy the 35mm format which has worked for me just fine from day one, but I find myself wanting something more. I rarely shoot landscapes anymore (as much as I enjoy them) as 35mm just can't quite capture the detail I've fallen in love with thanks to images shot on larger formats. I like to print big.

    Now, I'm looking for some advice. Option 1 would be nice, though not necessary. I prefer to shoot with a grip and I could use the flash, though I can live without both. Option 2 would cure my desire for more reach as the 85mm leaves me wanting (I previously had a Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM, but f/4 just isn't fast enough for me). Option 3 would get me the detail I long for and also lead me to purchase the Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm f/2.8 N and other lenses in the near future to build the system.

    I'm very tired, so this entire post may well be an intellectual trainwreck. I'll stop typing sans thought here and come back to revise once I've had a few pots of coffee. Thanks for any insight anyone can give, I really appreciate it.

    Rob
     
  2. Canuck

    Canuck Member

    Messages:
    211
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2004
    Location:
    Great White
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Greatest possiblilty for spending future monies lies with the 645 ... so my choice would be there :D
     
  3. Shmoo

    Shmoo Member

    Messages:
    972
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2003
    Location:
    Southern Cal
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    I went from an older Canon AE-1 with 3-4 lenses to a Mamiya 645E with comparable lenses...I haven't gone back to using the 35mm since. The only reservation I have is that the 645E model does not have a removable back like the 645 Pro TL. If I did it over again, I would get the Pro TL...or a Hasselblad...

    Of coure, after a year of the 645, I then went to 4x5...it's been downhill ever since!!!

    :D
     
  4. Phillip P. Dimor

    Phillip P. Dimor Member

    Messages:
    1,063
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Location:
    Westport, MA
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    I was in a similar situation. I went with a Pentax 645. MF works much better for me.
    After having used the 645 for three years, I still want a larger negative.
    I don't really use my 35mm kit for anything more than a loaner for close friends or a rainy day walkaround camera. It's tough to say what would be best for you but i'm glad I bought my mf camera.

    ps- the zoom lenses for the p645 are supposed to be pretty nice. I know that's not what you were looking at, though..
     
  5. sp_maher

    sp_maher Member

    Messages:
    36
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I would look to adding a good flash to your Canon, but decide if you need all the bells and whistles of the 550, if not go with a 3rd party flash for half the money and think about picking up some used MF gear--prices are insanely low. I've gotten alot of mileage out of my TLRs over the last few years and am now actually dumping some of my 35mm gear to fund my new/used Mamiya 645 system. These are hard choices, but the difference in image quality is well worth it.

    Sean
     
  6. Allan Swindles

    Allan Swindles Member

    Messages:
    250
    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Location:
    Wirral, Engl
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I am a multi-format user. I use 35mm for macro and holiday walkabouts, 6x6 (Hass.) for portraiture/social/landscape and most other subjects if I can persuade myself to carry the gear and 5x4 for very serious stuff - 95% reversal. If I still had darkroom facilities, and time, I would do more with the Hass. and 5x4. If you like to print BIG go for at least 6x4.5. I, personally prefer square format (better for cropping, unless they now have rotating backs on 6x4.5/6x7). Bear in mind that med./large format gear is slower to use than 35mm. Does this matter to you?
    It's really down to the type of photographer you are and where your main interests lie.
    I could go on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on..........
    Regards - Allan.
     
  7. Woolliscroft

    Woolliscroft Member

    Messages:
    726
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Do you have some specific role in mind for this new kit, or do you just have the money to spend? You can get a lot of film for 600 bucks, or go to some nice places to take pictures.

    David.
     
  8. gchpaco

    gchpaco Member

    Messages:
    98
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Well, since you mention not liking landscapes on 35mm, I suggest you get the Mamiya, or at least some other MF camera. 645 is three times the area from 35mm, and this is very noticable in prints, but I usually shoot 6x6 for convenience and because I happen to like square compositions. The case could be made for the Pentax 67 or whatever, but it'll be made by other people because I'm happy with my 6x6 SLR.
     
  9. Sean

    Sean Admin Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,952
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I moved up to a Mamiya 645 Super kit, and absolutely love it, sorry not much to add, but you might want a Super that has removable back ability. I shoot polaroid 665 pack film on mine and clear the negs in the field, I can't get enough of those 665 negs :smile:
     
  10. Mongo

    Mongo Member

    Messages:
    960
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2004
    Location:
    Pittsburgh,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Options 2 and 3 are almost in direct opposition to each other. MF is great for the detail you get, but long lenses in MF are still very expensive, and fast, long lenses are almost non-existant. To get the equivalent functionality in 645 as you'd get from the Canon 200/2.8, you'll probably have to sell your soul (along with the souls of some loved ones). I'll take the difference in these two options as a sign that you're looking for something to satisfy you, rather than something for a specific professional purpose.

    If I was in your shoes and had $600 to spend, I'd move on to option 4: A used Mamiya RB67 system. You can pick up an RB Pro-S, 120 back, waist level finder, and 127mm C lens for under $400 from KEH in Bargain grade. (If you wait a few weeks you'll probably find the same system with the 90mm lens at the same price; they just seem to be out of that configuration right now.)

    Admitedly, the RB isn't as easy to carry as a 645 system, but it isn't horrible either. You can use the system hand-held if you want to, but if it's detail in landscape that you're looking for then you want the biggest negatives you can get with good glass in front of them, all locked down on a good tripod. The RB is a great system for this. Plus, with the bellows built in, it's a decent macro system out of the box. For this price you don't get a light meter, but there are a lot of choices out there for less than the $200 you'd have left. (Igorcamera.com has a Soligar Zone VI modified spotmeter for $135...if ever there was a sleeper in light meters, this is it. Easy to use, easy to read, and very accurate...plus it takes regular 9V batteries. Mine's served me very well.)

    Don't be afraid of KEH's "Bargain" grade. They have a reasonable return policy, and the RB system I bought from them last year in bargain condition showed only wear around the back of the body and front of the film back; the rest of the camera was in amazing condition and has worked flawlessly from the day I got it. (KEH's Excellent, Excellent Plus, etc. grades are for collectors more than for users.)

    For detail in landscapes, nothing beats a bigger negative with good glass.
     
  11. Jeffrey A. Steinberg

    Jeffrey A. Steinberg Member

    Messages:
    296
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2004
    Location:
    Scarsdale, N
    Ok, option #4:

    Used Mamiya C330F or C330S, 80mm lens and 180mm lens. These wonderful cameras are plentiful, well made and have interchangable lenses. The best thing about this TLR is that you look down onto the ground glass and it slows you down (read: better photos).

    You can probably get all of the above for $600.
     
  12. David A. Goldfarb

    David A. Goldfarb Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    17,922
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2002
    Location:
    Honolulu, Ha
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    I've never been attracted to the 645 format. It shows some improvement over 35mm, but if one has a 35mm system, I think a better move is to go to 6x6 (if you like the square) or 6x7 if you prefer a rectangular format. You get more bang for the buck and the bulk at 6x6 or larger. Even if you don't print square (though I usually do) from 6x6, you get the option of cropping from anywhere in the frame, so if you take the image from the top of the frame, it's like using front rise on a view camera, and if you crop a vertical from the left or right, it's like getting shift.

    I would only look into 645 if I were going to have one system that had to be a compromise between 35mm and a larger medium format. The one possible exception might be the Bronica 645RF, if I wanted a compact rangefinder with interchangeable lenses.
     
  13. fparnold

    fparnold Member

    Messages:
    264
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2002
    Location:
    Binghamton,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    If you're not shooting landscapes because of limitations of 35mm, don't generally think wide, and miss them enough, then a 2x3 century graphic, with some modern 6x7 or 6x9 back would be a decent compromise between negative size and portability.

    If you shoot enough fashion to be frequently borrowing the RZ, then look for an older RB67/67Pro, and a second back. Your friend will appreciate it, and you won't have the scheduling issues.

    Alternately, from where I'm sitting (upstate NY in the dark and damp), I'd take a week off and go somewhere photogenic to recharge, taking the Canon and 2 most commonly used lenses. (because you never know when you're going to drop one)
     
  14. Loose Gravel

    Loose Gravel Member

    Messages:
    921
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2003
    Location:
    Santa Barbar
    Go with a new format. You will take different pictures and you might surprise yourself.