BW-65 (Photographers' Formulary)

Discussion in 'B&W: Film, Paper, Chemistry' started by Shesh, Nov 19, 2003.

  1. Shesh

    Shesh Member

    Messages:
    161
    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2002
    Location:
    Massachusett
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    What are the pros and cons of using BW-65 on FB and RC papers in comparison to dektol? The data sheet for the BW-65 developer says it works like amidol without its problems of staining and capacity issues. So, Does it mean it would give me deeper blacks and/or greater shadow detail? I have not used amidol either. so it is comparing one unknown with another. :confused:
    I currently use dektol with both FB and RC papers.
    TIA
     
  2. juan

    juan Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,745
    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Location:
    St. Simons I
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I tried it once for the same reasons you're looking. I did not find any real difference from Dektol - it's certainly not Amidol - at least not with Azo. I don't know about other papers. But then, it's not expensive, so why not try it to see if you like the results.
    juan
     
  3. fhovie

    fhovie Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,247
    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Location:
    Port Hueneme
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    I found it to be softer in contrast to dektol but the blacks were no better which I was expecting because of the use of Glycin. Oh - well - The best GP paper developer for me has ben Agfa RC developer. It lasts forever - has great blacks and works well with all my fiber papers. (oh yeh - did I mention that it is CHEAP) The next step is Amidol and Azo. The Amidol is on the shelf and the AZO will get ordered next week. Of course then there is Kalitype and Cyanotype --- but all these require enlarged negatives so they will also have to wait for me to get that technology down. So far - lots of failures but I have not run out of ideas.