Carl Ziess Planar 50/1.4 for Nikon?

Discussion in '35mm Cameras and Accessories' started by ToddB, Jun 23, 2013.

  1. ToddB

    ToddB Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,139
    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Hey guys,

    just realized that this lens existed? Is any good?

    ToddB
     
  2. SamSpade1941

    SamSpade1941 Member

    Messages:
    66
    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Location:
    Okla, USA
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Not any better than a 50 f/1.4 AI S nikkor when I test drove one. YMMV.
     
  3. ToddB

    ToddB Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,139
    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I have one of those.. Vintage 50mm 1.4 with silver rings. And also pancake 50 1.8.
     
  4. Jim Rice

    Jim Rice Member

    Messages:
    227
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Location:
    Jackson. MS,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    My experience with the Zeiss lenses is that they mix a pinch of magic into them. Whether this is worth the price is a question for you to answer.
     
  5. benjiboy

    benjiboy Subscriber

    Messages:
    8,120
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2005
    Location:
    U.K.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Is The Pope a catholic ?.
     
  6. Mustafa Umut Sarac

    Mustafa Umut Sarac Member

    Messages:
    4,521
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Location:
    İstanbul
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    ziess might not exist.
     
  7. Jim Rice

    Jim Rice Member

    Messages:
    227
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Location:
    Jackson. MS,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    And a bear shits in the woods.
     
  8. tony lockerbie

    tony lockerbie Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,358
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Location:
    Bega N.S.W.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Are they made by Cosina? I have a 58mm Auto-Topcor recreation by Cosina in AIs mount, it's better in every way than the 50mm 1.4 Nikkor.
     
  9. Nikon Collector

    Nikon Collector Member

    Messages:
    162
    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Location:
    Carolina Bea
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I have a Sigma UC zoom AF 70-210 that blows away all of my D lenses
     
  10. IloveTLRs

    IloveTLRs Member

    Messages:
    1,096
    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Location:
    Boston
    Shooter:
    Sub 35mm
    Do you mean this lens? http://www.kenrockwell.com/zeiss/zf50.htm

    I had a friend who had one and I saw the results. VERY sharp and contrasty. Try looking around Flickr and maybe PBase as I'm sure there are lots of examples.
     
  11. darkosaric

    darkosaric Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,856
    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2008
    Location:
    Hamburg, DE
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I don't doubt that this is fine and sharp lens, but If I would want to give so much money for this type of nikon mount manual lens - I would look for some nikkor f1.2.

    regards,
     
  12. dorff

    dorff Member

    Messages:
    460
    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Location:
    South Africa
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    The 50/1.4 Zeiss is among the less coveted Zeiss lenses, and it sort of makes sense as there is a Nikkor match that isn't all that bad either. Given the price, I think it has bragging more than practical value for a large majority. The Zeiss 85/1.4 is said to be noticeably sharper than the Nikkor. Even so, I have never felt let down by my Nikkor AF-D version, and am not about to give it up for a manual focus Zeiss twice the price. I am sure that also applies to most Nikkor 50/1.4 owners.

    Where the Zeiss lenses make more sense would be where a comparable Nikkor does not exist, e.g. the Makro-Planar 50/2 and 100/2, and some of the wide-angle primes which are markedly better than the offerings from Nikon. I have shot with the 100/2, and must admit that it is a wonderful optic. I feel no urge to fork out $1600, or whatever it costs nowadays, for a manual focus lens, but if it ever came in an AF-S version, I'd be right in front of the queue.
     
  13. artonpaper

    artonpaper Subscriber

    Messages:
    326
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Location:
    Staten Islan
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    When I look back at some of my prints from the 70s and 80s, I'm hard pressed to tell which were taken with my Nikon Ftn and the 50 mm 1.4, and my Lieca with a 50. (I can't recall which Leica 50.)
     
  14. E. von Hoegh

    E. von Hoegh Member

    Messages:
    3,879
    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2011
    Location:
    Adirondacks
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Probably it's very good. But will you see the difference in a blind a/b comparison? I'd say you need to look into the cost/benefit ratio. You can get a 50/1.4 Ai Nikkor for under $100 with a bit of luck, and this Zeiss will have to be a very very good lens indeed to beat out the Nikkor. So, it depends on whether you want to spend money, or take pictures.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 24, 2013
  15. nightbringer

    nightbringer Member

    Messages:
    53
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Location:
    Adelaide, So
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    If you really want to blow money on a Zeiss normal, wait for their 55mm f1.4 to come out later this year :wink: