Choosing a Color Neg Film

Discussion in 'Color: Film, Paper, and Chemistry' started by david b, Dec 14, 2007.

  1. david b

    david b Member

    Messages:
    4,031
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Location:
    None of your
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I am thinking of doing a bit of color work and since I have not done
    any color work in about 7 years or so, I am looking for a bit of
    assistance.

    First, I will be shooting 4x5 and scanning the film.

    Second, I will be doing a mix of outdoor portrait and landscape
    shots.

    Third, something in the 100-160 would be great. I am currently
    doing some work with FP4+ so this is my reference.

    thanks in advance.
     
  2. Pinholemaster

    Pinholemaster Member

    Messages:
    1,504
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Location:
    Westminster,
    Shooter:
    8x10 Format
    For my 8x10 color work, I use Fuji Pro 160S rated at 125 ISO for landscapes.

    For portraiture, I use Kodak Portra 400NC rated at 320 ISO to get the extra speed.

    Both do a fine job. No complaints.

    Here's what I'm doing with the color neg: http://www.walterpcalahan.com/Cheers/Carroll County.html
     
  3. Neal

    Neal Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,640
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2004
    Location:
    Chicago, Wes
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Dear David,

    You can't go wrong with any of the color negative films available in 4x5.

    Neal Wydra
     
  4. copake_ham

    copake_ham Inactive

    Messages:
    4,090
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Location:
    NYC or Copak
    Shooter:
    35mm
    One of the key features of the "new" Portra is enhanced scannability. Since you intend to scan your negs - I highly recommend it.

    So far I've only used in in 35mm. When I scanned some, as a test, I brought up the TIFF image in PS and tried to do an "auto adjustment". Nothing changed! On a strictly "auto" setting PS could not come up with a way to "improve" the original scanned image.

    Once I use up my "mixed bag" of various color negs - I probably going to exclusively use Portra.

    Oh, BTW, the Portra I used in the "scan test" was 160VC.
     
  5. keithwms

    keithwms Member

    Messages:
    6,070
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2006
    Location:
    Charlottesvi
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I sometimes use fuji pros S at 125 for landscapes, as mentioned above by Walter, and I use pro h for people, rating at 320 or 400, depending.

    Let me throw another thought into the mix and suggest considering slide film like astia or velvia. If you're going to be scanning then [properly exposed] slide film will give you more bang for your buck, in my opinion. At least for landscapes. In my opinion, colour neg film doesn't scan so well, it looks better when printed directly, whereas with slide you can get a lot of very clean information out before hitting the grain.
     
  6. Discpad

    Discpad Member

    Messages:
    132
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Shooter:
    Med. Format Pan
    Dear David,

    You can't go wrong with *any* of the color films available in 4x5!

    That being said, I wish I could get the color rendition of Fuji Reala 100 in 4x5
    http://users.snip.net/~joe/knoxville/index.htm