Commercial Street Photography regulations in Washington DC

Discussion in 'Ethics and Philosophy' started by TheFlyingCamera, Oct 28, 2011.

  1. TheFlyingCamera

    TheFlyingCamera Membership Council Council

    Messages:
    9,522
    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I saw something on the Washington Post's website today about this somewhat arcane law that can allow DC cops at their discretion to arrest and haul you down to the station for misdemeanor "offenses" that in the minds of most reasonable people would at best merit a citation (the case that brought this to light was a man who had expired license plates and was arrested for it. IIRC, he had out-of-state tags on his car because he was in the military and was only temporarily stationed here, and had just returned from an overseas deployment during which time the plates expired). While perusing the list of offenses which the police could arrest vice cite you, I came across an eyebrow-raiser: "Photographer - More than 5 minutes at location". Only five minutes???? I had to do some more digging to find out what that was all about. It turns out it specifically applies to licensed street photographers - the folks who set up those cheesy backdrops of spray-painted cars and palm trees and (at least used to) snap polaroids for $10. To be a licensed street photographer in Washington DC, it only costs you $25 (or $1... there's something I didn't quite understand in the reg about the licenses of Street Photography Business Licenses and Street Photography Individual Licenses). You must always display your badge and license while conducting business, and provide a card to the customer stating when their photograph will be delivered. The real kicker in the reg is this line though:

    Section 523.2 - Each photograph shall be clear and sharp, and shall show no blur of focus or camera movement which affects the principal subject

    So now the city knows better how to take a photograph than I do? (Not that I'm going to go around selling crappy photos, but I and my customer should be able to decide if they want an artsy/soft-focus/blurry/otherwise distorted image of themselves.

    The complete reg can be found at: http://os.dc.gov/os/frames.asp?doc=/os/lib/os/info/odai/title_24/title24_chapter5.pdf sections 521-523.

    Now that I know what the 5 minute rule is all about, it still boggles the mind to think you could somehow make money with setting up for no more than five minutes at a time. Heck, it takes more than 5 minutes just to set up the backdrop!
     
  2. BrianShaw

    BrianShaw Member

    Messages:
    6,710
    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Location:
    Los Angeles,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I'm guilty. Where do I turn myself in? Or am I exempt from incriminating myself?

    Oh, as a defense I might call in the Grammar Cops. I believe the phrase should be "... THAT affects...".
     
  3. brucemuir

    brucemuir Member

    Messages:
    2,266
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    Location:
    Metro DC are
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    DC legislators were never the sharpest knives in the drawer.
    :smile:
     
  4. bdial

    bdial Subscriber

    Messages:
    5,435
    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Location:
    NE U.S.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I guess you show them the GG of your 5x7 to demonstrate how how it's not blurred and the principal subject is clear and sharp?
    That might be fun to watch!
     
  5. TheFlyingCamera

    TheFlyingCamera Membership Council Council

    Messages:
    9,522
    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Bruce- too true. And they're also not even very good at being corrupt, which seems to be the one thing they are good at. Try as they might, they can't hold a candle to Boss Tweed or Richard Daly (or Huey Long). We just get stupid and venal stuff like ordering luxury SUVs and charging the taxpayers when it comes in the non-preferred interior color, or getting busted by the FBI for smoking crack.
     
  6. SuzanneR

    SuzanneR Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    5,891
    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Just bears repeating! :wink:
     
  7. Leigh B

    Leigh B Member

    Messages:
    1,033
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Location:
    Maryland, US
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Those knives couldn't find the drawer even if they were in it. :D

    Like all other politicians in this esteemed democracy... best politicians money can buy. :blink:

    - Leigh
     
  8. Kevin Caulfield

    Kevin Caulfield Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,392
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Location:
    Melbourne, A
    Shooter:
    Multi Format

    No need to call them in. "which affects" is correct. :smile:
     
  9. Jeff Kubach

    Jeff Kubach Member

    Messages:
    6,930
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Location:
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I remember one Andy Griffith show where Barney Fife arrested half the town on stupid stuff.

    Jeff
     
  10. brucemuir

    brucemuir Member

    Messages:
    2,266
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    Location:
    Metro DC are
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    In the interest of :whistling: fairness
    The 5 minute provision was probably inserted into this to make sure you didn't block major tourist spots with a commercial enterprise on the sidewalk.

    Same way they hound you if you try to setup a tripod these days.

    Who knows when this law was even enacted. And no, I don't wanna wade through the net to find out.
    :smile:

    The sharp and in focus provision could've been written in as a "stop-gap measure" to counter those pesky pictorialists back in the early part of the last century :wink:
     
  11. BrianShaw

    BrianShaw Member

    Messages:
    6,710
    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Location:
    Los Angeles,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Well, I suppose that discussion is neither hear nor they're given the topic being discussed. :tongue: