Cross Country Skiing

Discussion in '35mm Cameras and Accessories' started by winikoff, Dec 30, 2004.

  1. winikoff

    winikoff Member

    Messages:
    1
    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
    Location:
    Pittsburgh,
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    We do a fair amount of cross country skiing. It does not seem like a great idea to keep a 35 mm. camera in a backpack. Does anyone know of a strap/holder/etc. that would allow skiing but still allow me to keep the camera under my jacket?

    Stan
     
  2. Ed Sukach

    Ed Sukach Member

    Messages:
    4,518
    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2002
    Location:
    Ipswich, Mas
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I do a fair amount of Cross-Country. True to APUG philosophy, I still wax -- with a propane-fired waxing torch. IMHO - beats the squat out of ANY waxless.

    Even the lightest of "common" 35mms feels like a cement block around one's neck, when you're out there . My best - so far - has been a Minolta 110 ... with a weird battery. Haven't used that puppy for a while - but it was, by far, the best.

    I've been thinking of *one* - the Minox 35. Apparently the most compact and lightest around, except for the 8mm x 11mm Minoxes.

    Anyone have information/ opinions about the Minox 35s?
     
  3. Bob F.

    Bob F. Member

    Messages:
    3,984
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2004
    Location:
    London
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Bum bag.

    Sorry, not an insult :wink:... I think they are called "fanny packs" in the U.S. (but "fanny" is a naughty word over here and means something quite different).

    You could wear it at the front and under your clothes, rather than over them. Not tried it under clothes but I often wear one when walking in the hills - I guess it depends how far your top layers of clothing extend over your tummy/hips.

    Cheers, Bob.
     
  4. Ed Sukach

    Ed Sukach Member

    Messages:
    4,518
    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2002
    Location:
    Ipswich, Mas
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I guess "Fanny", if worn to the rear, would be preferable to "Pregnant" packs if worn in the front.

    I'm familiar with them. Personally, on the trail, I'd *MUCH*prefer a "lightest of light" back pack.
     
  5. clogz

    clogz Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,842
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Location:
    Rotterdam, T
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    As to the Minox 35s. Fine little cameras but prone to shutter trouble, esp. the older types. Good sharp lens. www.submin.com/35mm/manuals/minox

    After having two Minoxes break down with shutter failure I bought a second hand Olympus XA which so far has given me better service. www.diaxa.com
    Hans
     
  6. elekm

    elekm Member

    Messages:
    2,059
    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Location:
    New Jersey (
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    Minox 35: Nice cameras, though I agree unfortunately about the shutter comment. Of three cameras, two have had bad shutters.

    The Olympus XA might do nicely for you. Possibly the Rollei 35, though it doesn't offer the same level of protection as either the Olympus or the Minox.
     
  7. clogz

    clogz Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,842
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Location:
    Rotterdam, T
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Indeed the Rollei may also be a good option as it offers full manual override which is handy when taking pics in the snow. The XA has aperture priority with one-and-half stop exposure compensation.
     
  8. John Koehrer

    John Koehrer Subscriber

    Messages:
    6,423
    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Location:
    Montgomery,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I brlieve Tamrac makes a strap that will hold the camera snug to your chest & can easily be slipped off for use. Check with any full line Tamrac dealer, If they don't stock the item they should be able to order it for you.