Damn! Just bought a 3 beam balance

Discussion in 'Alternative Processes' started by Ross Chambers, Jan 26, 2011.

  1. Ross Chambers

    Ross Chambers Member

    Messages:
    703
    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Location:
    Blue Mountai
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
  2. boswald

    boswald Member

    Messages:
    46
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    They are mistaken. We are simply entering a period of weak gravity.
     
  3. Mike Wilde

    Mike Wilde Member

    Messages:
    2,936
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Location:
    Misissauaga
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Don't slag the humble triple beam.
    That and a simple pan balance good to 50g will do almost all the DIY chem mixing you are likely to need, if you don't mix more than 4L of something at a time

    They are affordable, and durable.
    I tare mine when I use a Dixie cup on the pan with a small length of wire that hangs from the end of the beam.
    I have a plastic container filled with the right number of screws that hangs there when I want to measure over 610g, up to 1110g.

    I appreciate the concern in the BBC story, but for my purposes if I am consistent to 1% between subsequent batches I think I am doing just fine.
    The thing came from an antique shop in Brooklyn over the *bay when it was a person to person affair about 7 long years ago. Oh, I do miss those days.
     
  4. dpurdy

    dpurdy Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,223
    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2006
    Location:
    Portland OR
    Shooter:
    8x10 Format
    That kilo of platinum would be getting smaller and smaller if I had the lock and key.
     
  5. JOSarff

    JOSarff Member

    Messages:
    203
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Location:
    Santa Fe, NM
    Shooter:
    8x10 Format
    Well, if their just going to chuck it . . . .
     
  6. Ross Chambers

    Ross Chambers Member

    Messages:
    703
    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Location:
    Blue Mountai
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Just joking, I find it of enormous value ever since I was bequeathed a heap of dry chemistry. Before that I was using an electronic scale which lasted a few months. Perhaps it's not a good idea to buy lab equipment from transient merchants in the forecourts of shopping malls. It seems that the triple beam will be indestructable and not fail me at a critical time. It just took a long time to find one.

    On another note: I do wonder how the French feel about one of their national treasures, the platinum standard kilo specimen being called into doubt?
     
  7. Mick Fagan

    Mick Fagan Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,072
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Location:
    Melbourne Au
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I have a triple beam as well, actually it's a quad beam and I'm sure if you look at yours closely you'll see a fourth beam for the sliding weight at the rear.

    Had mine for about 25 years, it's not slower than electronic scales. For my work I required some very accurate electronic scales, which I purchased about 15 years ago. Beauty, I thought, never need to fiddle with the triple beam scales again.

    I used the electronic scales about four, maybe five times, then gave up on them. Once or twice I looked up a note on a possible adjustment of a chemical amount, by the time I found the note and worked out what I was going to do, the scales had switched off.

    Then there is the not quite flat battery syndrome, talk about frustration!

    Mick.
     
  8. Diapositivo

    Diapositivo Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,131
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Location:
    Rome, Italy
    Shooter:
    35mm
    The only thing that will change are the operating instructions for German and Swiss chemical products.

    "In order to obtain 1 litre of solution, just mix 125,0000000000000001 grams of powder A, mix until complete dissolution, than add 250,0000000000000001 grams of power B. Then add water until 1 litre". :confused:

    Fabrizio