Familiar with close-up lenses?

Discussion in 'Macro Photography' started by jolefler, Dec 13, 2008.

  1. jolefler

    jolefler Member

    Messages:
    420
    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2006
    Location:
    Northeast Oh
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Although the process I'm using involves copying 35mm negs with a digicam instead of a scanner, this is really a question about the optics, not a hybrid process.

    I use a +2 close up lens in front of the digicam lens, which fills the frame. When I copy the negs I get a fairly usable image, but the sharpness deteriorates horribly from the center to the edges...especially the 36mm axis.

    I'm assuming that's due to the close-up lens degrading the image toward the edges. Would the use of a step-up ring (say 52-67mm) and a larger +2 close-up lens help the situation? Thanks!

    Jo
     
  2. Nicholas Lindan

    Nicholas Lindan Advertiser Advertiser

    Messages:
    2,386
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Location:
    Cleveland, O
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Try really stopping down the lens on the digicam. You may also want to focus about 1/3 from the center or so: it is a trade off between center and edge sharpness. The results will never be that great, though close up lenses can be sharp they are not flat-field - it is the nature of using closeup lenses and there isn't much you can do about it. Stopping down increases the depth of field to allow you to get more of the slide in focus.
     
  3. Konical

    Konical Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,709
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2003
    Good Morning, Jo,

    Generally speaking, it's a good idea to use small f-stops in conjunction with auxiliary close-up lenses. Are you sure that you have everything locked up tightly in your copying set-up? A little vibration is magnified greatly in 1:1 situations, especially if relatively long exposures are required.

    Konical
     
  4. jolefler

    jolefler Member

    Messages:
    420
    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2006
    Location:
    Northeast Oh
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    G' morning! I'm pretty sure everything is tight. I always use the self timer to trigger the shutter on a 2-4 second delay; since it's all electronic, I doubt vibration is an issue.

    The aperature is an issue, though. The lens only stops down to f8, a major limitation, though that's the aperature I always use. A trade off in focus location may help, though...thanks for that! Perhaps I can experiment with bending the neg slightly to accomodate focus; no wait... I get a good, square rectangle around the edges now, curving the neg will mess that up.
     
  5. Q.G.

    Q.G. Inactive

    Messages:
    5,682
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    This is a "there is no free lunch" thingy.
    Close up lenses typically have terrible aberrations, which you can't conjure away by bending the film or shifting focus.
    You will get far better results using extension tubes (even with a standard lens). A special macro lens would be even better.
    But they cost...
     
  6. n5jrn

    n5jrn Member

    Messages:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2009
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Not on a compact digicam with a tiny sensor (and thus a really short lens focal length). F/8 is a *really* tiny hole (generally already at the point where diffraction is starting to degrade image quality) at the wide end of a digicam zoom. It's smaller than f/32 on a 50mm normal lens on a 35mm SLR, in fact (assuming an actual focal length of 10mm or less on the digicam).
     
  7. geoferrell

    geoferrell Member

    Messages:
    81
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    Location:
    McKee, KY 40
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I've used a Cokin P Adapter with a #2 closeup filter on a MF 80mm lens and gotten good results. I think macro lenses probably do better, especially for more depth of field.
     
  8. archphoto

    archphoto Member

    Messages:
    1,066
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Location:
    Holland and
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    Sorry Geoferrell, to correct you: depth of field is determend by the focal length, the distance to the object and the aperture.
    Macro lenses perform better because they are designed esp. for close-ups.

    Jolefler: save those slides for the time being untill a scanner comes up.

    Peter
     
  9. jolefler

    jolefler Member

    Messages:
    420
    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2006
    Location:
    Northeast Oh
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Thanks folks!

    For now, I get very passable results by wet printing a 5x7, then shooting that with the same digicam (no C.U. filter needed) on a copy stand.

    Most of my APUG portfolio are copy stand digi shots of 8x10 prints. I'm inclined to just take a pass on neg scanning/copying.....there's also the side benefit of seeing my printing improving with all the practice!...AND, I'm helping create a demand for silver gel paper! :D

    Jo