First medium format film developed!

Discussion in 'Medium Format Cameras and Accessories' started by jkasarda, Sep 11, 2012.

  1. jkasarda

    jkasarda Member

    Messages:
    9
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2011
    Location:
    Massachusett
    Shooter:
    Med. Format RF
    well here is the pictures from my first roll of film. i used Ilford 50 Panf +
    tell me what you think
    848881594.jpg
    848881590.jpg
    848881555.jpg
    848881575.jpg
     
  2. Sirius Glass

    Sirius Glass Subscriber

    Messages:
    20,714
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Location:
    Southern California
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Great results!
     
  3. SkipA

    SkipA Member

    Messages:
    604
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2002
    Location:
    127.0.0.1
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Good job. What developer?
     
  4. Gavin R

    Gavin R Member

    Messages:
    14
    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    Location:
    IOW, UK
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    The first three look as though they've been heavily over sharpened during transition to digitalising.
    My first roll came out fogged so you done better than I.
     
  5. F/1.4

    F/1.4 Member

    Messages:
    235
    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    These look like terrible scans...this is similar to what I get from Delta 3200..except with zero tonality in the mids.
     
  6. MFstooges

    MFstooges Member

    Messages:
    209
    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Agree with Gavin.
     
  7. michaelbsc

    michaelbsc Member

    Messages:
    2,106
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Location:
    South Caroli
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I think the picture of the platform has a lot of potential. And I would revisit that subject more than once if I were you. Good job.

    Pan F is a pretty high contrast film, so it's a little hard to control at first. So don't let the difficulty getting it into posting form scare you.

    But it is an awesome film too.

    I find that I generally develop it soft. And if I have high contrast negs then print soft.

    For a first roll I'll give you two thumbs up.
     
  8. Jeff Kubach

    Jeff Kubach Member

    Messages:
    6,926
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Location:
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Look good to me.

    Jeff
     
  9. Slixtiesix

    Slixtiesix Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,121
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2006
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    #1 looks way too contrasty, #2 still a little contrasty. #3+4 seem to have optimal tonality. Maybe the exposure was off in the first picture?
    Apart from that they look pretty good. Keep shooting! Which Developer did you use?
     
  10. Bruce Robbins

    Bruce Robbins Member

    Messages:
    118
    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Location:
    Carnoustie,
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    It's difficult judging images on a screen when the scanning could have had so much to do with things. I'd agree that the first couple look a bit contrasty but whether that's the negatives or not is impossible to say. If it is then I think you need to give a little more exposure, maybe a stop, and cut back on the development by, say 15% for starters. But hardly any of us get things right straight off the bat. The important thing is that you've proved to yourself you can handle medium format and you'll now keep on buying film to make sure it hangs around as long as possible. Wont you!!
     
  11. tron_

    tron_ Member

    Messages:
    378
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2011
    Location:
    Michigan
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Did your scanner sharpen the images? I feel the same as a few people above who have said that the first two frames look pretty over-sharpened. I think the amount of contrast MIGHT be okay if the photos were not so sharp but it is hard to tell.

    I would ask about your scan settings but I know APUG doesn't take too kindly to that sort of thing :tongue:

    3 and 4 are my favorite. The only thing that bothers me a little about 4 is how the focus was missed. It would have been okay if the entire frame was out of focus but, for me, seeing the branches in focus really makes me uneasy.

    Anyways, overall a pretty good set! Mind sharing what you shot this with?
     
  12. michaelbsc

    michaelbsc Member

    Messages:
    2,106
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Location:
    South Caroli
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    How do they print?!

    The scanner to post them is good for the initial bit so you get some bragging rights.

    But slap those puppies onto some paper in the darkroom. That's where you want to be.

    And I still like the picture of the platform. There is potential there.
     
  13. one90guy

    one90guy Subscriber

    Messages:
    392
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2009
    Location:
    Texas Gulf C
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I hope my first results are as good, should have my room set by mid October. Last time I was in a darkroom was the early 70's. I liked the platform image.
     
  14. 2bits

    2bits Member

    Messages:
    826
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Location:
    Colorado
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Great shots for first outing!
     
  15. Sirius Glass

    Sirius Glass Subscriber

    Messages:
    20,714
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Location:
    Southern California
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I do not like to judge scans of negatives. How do they print?
     
  16. Matthew Wagg

    Matthew Wagg Member

    Messages:
    95
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Location:
    Sandiacre, N
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    No. 3 is my favourite from recognising it as pan-f.
    The others to me looked too contrasty and no.1 has some highlight detail blown.
     
  17. robbalbrecht

    robbalbrecht Member

    Messages:
    78
    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Location:
    Los Osos, CA
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Congrats! I think they look cool but a tad over sharpened. What really matters is how they print.
     
  18. 2bits

    2bits Member

    Messages:
    826
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Location:
    Colorado
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    What camera did you use?
     
  19. TareqPhoto

    TareqPhoto Member

    Messages:
    1,045
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Location:
    Ajman - UAE
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I love this film, but your shot came out as they are overdone, sure next time you will get it better.

    As all asked you, which developer? and What camera+lens combo?
     
  20. bushpig

    bushpig Member

    Messages:
    307
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Location:
    Escaped Bake
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    It looks like a good start.

    You missed your focus on the portrait though. Person is all fuzzy. Would've been a decent shot. Plus, he gets points for smoking a pipe (something I do as well).

    Keep going.
     
  21. Andre Noble

    Andre Noble Subscriber

    Messages:
    335
    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2004
    Location:
    Beverly Hill
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I think Ilford Pan F is a film best suited to Pyro developers.
     
  22. philruss

    philruss Member

    Messages:
    11
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Location:
    Houston area
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I agree with Bruce, great start-keep up the good work!
     
  23. John Wiegerink

    John Wiegerink Subscriber

    Messages:
    574
    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Location:
    Lake Station, MI
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Might just be the mood he wanted to convey? I rather like it as it looks like it could be from a far early time. That being said, I think the shots before the Pipe Smoke would have been better in Pyro or even something like Rodinal 1:100 semi-stand. Perceptol at 1:3 might have calmed them down a little also. Just my opinion of course. JohnW
     
  24. bushpig

    bushpig Member

    Messages:
    307
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Location:
    Escaped Bake
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Normally, I'd agree with you, John.

    However, since the plant behind him is in clear focus, I don't think I can. If the whole scene was out of focus, I actually wouldn't mind it. However, the plant being in focus draws my eye away from the interesting part of the photo (the gentleman smoking). Perhaps the plant is supposed to be the subject, but I doubt it.

    Either way, the shot has good potential and I'd like to see jkasarda revisit it and try again.
     
  25. michaelbsc

    michaelbsc Member

    Messages:
    2,106
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Location:
    South Caroli
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I agree.

    Keep it up. Forget all this other mumbo jumbo for a few months. Concentrate on what you have now.

    Decent film. Regular developer. Get the shots on the film. Make the prints.


    Building Rome comes later.

    You're off to a hell of a good start in my opinion.