Foma 120 and rodinal

Discussion in 'B&W: Film, Paper, Chemistry' started by rmolson, Jul 30, 2011.

  1. rmolson

    rmolson Member

    Messages:
    307
    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Location:
    Mansfield Oh
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Foma film

    Just finished shooting up a roll of Foma 100 in the calumet rollback for my Busch 4x5’ Processed in Rodinal 1:50 The sharpness blew me away. Now I remember why I loved those old Raptars on our Speed Graphics! We would describe sharpness as so sharp you could cut your self on it . The only thing about Foma is besides the glue on the sealing wrapper which sucks, is the tendency of roll film to walk off the reel if the lead edge is not secured by the clamp in the center of the reel It has happened twice. I open the lid of the tank to check fixing and the film is all lined against the side of the tank. Perfectly developed and fixed no mottle or uneven development just not in the reel. Only film I have ever had that happen with. Guess I’ll have to start anchoring the film in the center of the reel..
     
  2. brianmquinn

    brianmquinn Member

    Messages:
    680
    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Location:
    Cincinnati O
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I agree, in Rodinal it is super sharp but has high grain. In stock Xtol the grain is low but the sharpness is much less. Unless you have tried this yourself you do not know how dramatic the difference is. You can get fine grain or high sharpness by choosing Xtol or R09 or etc.... TRY IT!!!!
     
  3. Rick A

    Rick A Subscriber

    Messages:
    7,417
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2009
    Location:
    northern Pa.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I like to use either Rodinal 1+50 or Pyrocat-HD depending on subject matter. They both print exceptionally well with the edge going to Pyro.
     
  4. georg16nik

    georg16nik Member

    Messages:
    1,044
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Man, Rodinal and Xtol are different beasts...
    Pyrocat-HD and Rodinal share some character similarities, although the Pyro stains the negative a bit, so it might eat a slice of the effective printing density..
    IMHO, for slow/medium speed emulsions.., I would dare say that Tetenal Neofin Blue completely murders Rodinal in many regards.
    I am talking from experience in the 135 format, so 120 should be ok :cool:
    There have been so many versions of Rodinal over the years, that it is even not funny :wink: All of them works., but its real identity was, somehow lost in transition...
    Tetenal Neofin Blue has been pretty much the same product over the years and at least in Europe, Tetenal has always been the wizard perfectionist.
     
  5. brianmquinn

    brianmquinn Member

    Messages:
    680
    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Location:
    Cincinnati O
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    When people try out XYZ film they often test only a roll or two. They also usually only use one developer. Then they say, “I don’t like XYZ film”. My point is to get to know a film you have to shoot several rolls under different lighting conditions, with different subjects and with different developers to really know where it works for you. So if you tried Fomapan and did not like the grain try Xtol. If you love sharpness and I do for SOME but not ALL subjects try Rodinal.