Full Plate film holder size

Discussion in 'Large Format Cameras and Accessories' started by Rob Skeoch, Aug 27, 2007.

  1. Rob Skeoch

    Rob Skeoch Advertiser

    Messages:
    983
    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Location:
    Burlington,
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    Does anyone know the exact outside dimension of a full plate film holder?
    -Rob
     
  2. Terence

    Terence Member

    Messages:
    1,346
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    Location:
    NYC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    You made to narrow it down to a maker and time period. I have 3 film holders of two different sizes and styles and 6 plate holders of 3 different sizes and two different styles.
     
  3. Roger Hicks

    Roger Hicks Member

    Messages:
    4,913
    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Location:
    Northern Aqu
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    No, there was a standardized 1/1 pl holder (like 4x5, 5x7/13x18/half plate, 8x10/18x24) -- but alas I no longer have any.
     
  4. TheFlyingCamera

    TheFlyingCamera Membership Council

    Messages:
    9,184
    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Location:
    Washington D
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    The closest thing to a "standard" whole-plate film holder was the Kodak/Rochester, at least in the United States. There may well have been a different English/French standard. When you get into bookform holders for glass plates, the standards concept goes completely out the window. DDS-style glass plate holders might also conform to the same Rochester/Kodak standard in the US, and the UK/Fr standard elsewhere. There's probably also a yet again different standard in Germany.
     
  5. Harrigan

    Harrigan Member

    Messages:
    342
    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Location:
    Shenadoah Va
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    My Rittreck FP holders were probably some of the last made. They measure about 7-3/4" wide or just over 195mm width. They are 10-11/16" long or about 271mm not including the dark slides. I wouldn't take these as perfect measurements but should be pretty close.
     

    Attached Files:

  6. Oren Grad

    Oren Grad Subscriber

    Messages:
    952
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2005
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    The Rittreck WP holders are considerably different from the Eastman holders. In particular, the distance to the rib lock makes the Rittreck holders too long to fit in Eastman backs, or at least the Eastman backs that I have on hand.

    Rob, why do you ask? The best answer for your purposes may vary depending on what you're trying to fit to what.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 27, 2007
  7. Harrigan

    Harrigan Member

    Messages:
    342
    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Location:
    Shenadoah Va
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    The Rittreck FH fit my old Century full plate but i never shot them in that camera. They appear to have the same t-lock dimensions.
     
  8. Dave Wooten

    Dave Wooten Member

    Messages:
    2,718
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2004
    Location:
    Vegas/myster
    Shooter:
    ULarge Format
    Rob what are the specs on the new Ebony full plate cameras?
     
  9. Sal Santamaura

    Sal Santamaura Member

    Messages:
    1,409
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Location:
    San Clemente
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Ebony built its camera back to accept my Lotus holders, which were based on Lotus' 8x10 holder design. That means their T-dimension is 0.260 inch, which a number of vintage 6.5x8.5 holders also used.

    Outside width of the Lotus holder is 198.0mm. Distance from taped end to start of the lock rib is 233.4mm. Thickness is 14.3mm.

    Fotoman Camera is making its holders very slightly smaller in width and distance to lock rib and also using 0.260 inch for the T-dimension. That way they will be compatible with the Ebony as well as a number of vintage cameras.
     
  10. Dave Wooten

    Dave Wooten Member

    Messages:
    2,718
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2004
    Location:
    Vegas/myster
    Shooter:
    ULarge Format
    Thanks
     
  11. Rob Skeoch

    Rob Skeoch Advertiser

    Messages:
    983
    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Location:
    Burlington,
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    So I get the feeling there's no standard. Sal do you feel the Lotus holders are the ones to use as a modern day standard. I'm not likely to buy old holders anyway.
    -Rob
     
  12. Sal Santamaura

    Sal Santamaura Member

    Messages:
    1,409
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Location:
    San Clemente
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I was never able to find an ANSI/ISO standard for this size, going back to the 1951 version.

    Given their price, I don't think the Lotus holders will take hold as a "standard." It will likely come down to them or the impending Fotoman Camera 6.5x8.5 holders. While an exact weight is not yet available from Fotoman, I suspect those will be noticeably heavier than Lotus', considering Paul is using high density plastic as well as metal septums and dark slides.

    If one were designing a camera back, I'd suggest sizing for the Lotus holders. That would permit using either them or the very slightly smaller (outer dimensions) Fotoman holders, with the choice based on criticality of weight and budget.
     
  13. Terence

    Terence Member

    Messages:
    1,346
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    Location:
    NYC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    As noted by others, there may have been more common sizes, but not one worldwide standard. With the exception of two Japanese bookform holders, all of my holders are "typical" double-darkslide style and of U.S. origin and every company's is different. Some don't even have ribs for the rib lock, but rather slide into a pocket at end opposite the dark-slide slot. The overall sizes of the film holders vary by almost an inch in the length and width. The plate holders are closer at 3/4".