Getty Images

Discussion in 'Presentation & Marketing' started by Tony-S, Jun 25, 2013.

  1. Tony-S

    Tony-S Member

    Messages:
    775
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2009
    Location:
    Fort Collins
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Just got an email from Getty Images about some of my Flickr photos. Anyone do this? There is a contract associated so I want to make sure what it's all about before jumping in. Pros and cons, anyone?

    TIA
     
  2. Richard S. (rich815)

    Richard S. (rich815) Subscriber

    Messages:
    4,958
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2003
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    (Delete)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 25, 2013
  3. Sirius Glass

    Sirius Glass Subscriber

    Messages:
    20,588
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Location:
    Southern California
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Is this that start of another deleted thread?
     
  4. polyglot

    polyglot Member

    Messages:
    3,472
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Location:
    South Austra
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    The commercial terms are absolutely terrible, in the grand scheme of commercial terms. But if you're happy with them for your purposes, go ahead.
     
  5. Tony-S

    Tony-S Member

    Messages:
    775
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2009
    Location:
    Fort Collins
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I really don't know what the terms mean since I've only done photography for personal gratification. What's terrible about them?
     
  6. polyglot

    polyglot Member

    Messages:
    3,472
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Location:
    South Austra
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Basically they take everything and give nothing. If you don't understand the terms of the agreement, you absolutely shouldn't be signing it. You know, the whole bit about when you can't spot the sucker at the table, etc.

    For starters:
    a) they take 80% commission instead of 30-50%
    b) they demand exclusivity and a whole bunch of other rights you wouldn't normally hand over

    Some articles: JMG, Hawk and Thornton.
     
  7. Tom1956

    Tom1956 Inactive

    Messages:
    2,057
    Joined:
    May 6, 2013
    Location:
    US
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    Is it perhaps possible that "image pollution" may manifest these days?
     
  8. Tony-S

    Tony-S Member

    Messages:
    775
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2009
    Location:
    Fort Collins
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Alright, sounds like I'll forgo this predatory company.
     
  9. rthomas

    rthomas Member

    Messages:
    1,182
    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC, USA
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Read through the terms, and that is not a contract I would ever sign.
     
  10. polyglot

    polyglot Member

    Messages:
    3,472
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Location:
    South Austra
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    The above is only one side of it, and the people that think the contract is bad are usually commercial/pro photographers. Compared to any other buying arrangement a commercial photographer would enter into, it is very bad.

    However, a lot of people do sign the contract and are happy with the trickle of money they receive. If you never intend to make any other commercial use of the images in question, are happy to trade value for getting any money at all and can provide all necessary model releases, then it may well make sense for you to give Getty access to some of your images. I would never hand over my whole stream or give them exclusive rights to represent me, but I could imagine letting them sell a handful of images for me, with the full understanding that I was being commercially exploited wrt those images.

    It is, after all, basically zero-effort cash that you're otherwise maybe not getting. So don't let me talk you out of it, but really you do need to understand the contract fully, which will require reading up on a bunch of legal and commercial terms and finding other typical contracts to compare with.
     
  11. Felinik

    Felinik Member

    Messages:
    428
    Joined:
    May 13, 2012
    Shooter:
    35mm
    If you use flickr to dump stuff you don't feel any use for somewhere else and their choice are amongst such pics, why not.. But if the pics are amongst stuff you love and value, don't even think about it...

    :smile: