Greedy Zhenya, or another uncoated 135/4.5 lens for $30... :)

Discussion in 'Large Format Cameras and Accessories' started by eumenius, Jul 5, 2006.

  1. eumenius

    eumenius Member

    Messages:
    768
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Location:
    Moscow, Russ
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Hello friends,

    it looks like I'm going down the Detective Brettschneider's route, remember this guy from Hasek's Brave Soldier Svejk? He kept buying dogs from Svejk to wheedle out some info from him, and he ended up being eaten with all the pack collected :smile:

    Today I've got a speckless, perfect specimen of Schneider Xenar 135/4.5 in dial-set Compur (working fine, a small handle on the diaphragm lever down there is broken off - that's nothing). Made around 1929, the glass is perfect - there's not a single scratch. Well, that's the third lens of this class I possess, am I nuts? But that was only $30... would this Xenar be any good, or pictorially different with, say, echt Zeiss Tessar 135/4.5 of the same time? :smile:

    Call me crazy, but looks like there I am - Zhenya
     
  2. BradS

    BradS Subscriber

    Messages:
    4,219
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Location:
    S.F. Bay Area
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    No, I would not call you crazy. I call you very fortunate....who could pass up such a great deal? Good show!
     
  3. clogz

    clogz Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,842
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Location:
    Rotterdam, T
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    A clear case of GAS, Gear Acquisition Syndrome, but there is no need to see a shrink about that. lol

    Hans
     
  4. Bruce Osgood

    Bruce Osgood Membership Council Council

    Messages:
    2,612
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2002
    Location:
    Brooklyn, N.Y.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I have this lens and like it a lot. The only problem for me is that it has a coverage of 160mm, just covers 4X5 without ANY movement. I can't speak to the Tesar but I do not see any reason to replace mine except for the coverage.
     
  5. Ole

    Ole Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    9,281
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2002
    Location:
    Bergen, Norw
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    Welcome to the club, Zhenya!

    I've got one of those too - and a 135/3.5 Xenar Typ D, a 135/4.5 Tessar, a 150/4.5 Xenar (late-ish), a 150/9 G-Claron, a 150/9 Germinar-W, a 150/4.5 Apo-Lanthar, a 150/4.5 Heliar, a 135/4.5 Eurynar - and that's only the ones in working shutters!
     
  6. Claire Senft

    Claire Senft Member

    Messages:
    3,242
    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Location:
    Milwaukee, W
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I have just dispatched 3 guys..big and burly..along with what I hope is a jacket that will fit you. You should be able to lick this insidious disease..it has been given the name of Oleoldlensdeepfiord syndrome..if you stay away from your computer and do not drink beverages sold by Olaf and James Galli vinters of diffraction.
     
  7. BrianShaw

    BrianShaw Member

    Messages:
    6,665
    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Location:
    Los Angeles,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I'd rather lick an ice cream cone than lick an insideous disease. But that's only me.
     
  8. Claire Senft

    Claire Senft Member

    Messages:
    3,242
    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Location:
    Milwaukee, W
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I agree with you Brian. An ice cream cone makes a wonderful choice if nothing better is available.
     
  9. Dan Fromm

    Dan Fromm Member

    Messages:
    4,136
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Zhenya, the next time you feel tempted to buy a lens that's like several you have already, calculate how many ice cream cones you'll have to give up to pay for it. Is the lens worth it? I bet not!

    Cheers,

    Dan
     
  10. Donald Qualls

    Donald Qualls Member

    Messages:
    1,845
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Location:
    North Caroli
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Zhenya, I have no direct experience with Xenar lenses, but I don't find there's a visible difference between my ca. 1935 Skopar 13.5 cm f/4.5 and my pair of ca. 1926 CZJ Tessars of the same specification. I'd have to do side-by-side testing to be certain, but surely there's no difference that would show in, say, an 18x24 cm print from 9x12 cm film...
     
  11. Ole

    Ole Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    9,281
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2002
    Location:
    Bergen, Norw
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    Dang. I knew I had forgotten one.

    Yes, there's one of those too in my "accumulation". It lives on a 1934 Voigtländer Avus 9x12cm.