Grungy 85 1.8 SMC Takumar

Discussion in '35mm Cameras and Accessories' started by C A Sugg, May 2, 2009.

  1. C A Sugg

    C A Sugg Member

    Messages:
    192
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2005
    Location:
    Richmond, VA
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I recently got my hands on my old 85mm 1.8 Super-Multi-Coated Takumar. (put "SMC" in title to save space.) Unfortunately it has lived for most of the last 20 years in as close as you can get to a basement above ground.
    Mechanically it's fine. (Kudos to Asahi engineers!) And the front surface under the filter is clean. The rear surface cleaned up easily, but there is fungus on at least 2 of the inner surfaces.
    Is this lens worth getting serviced? Is that even possible? I owned this lens for more than a decade and it was, in hindsight, wonderfull. It's just that I was switching over to Olympus.

    Charles
     
  2. Rol_Lei Nut

    Rol_Lei Nut Member

    Messages:
    1,118
    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    Location:
    Hamburg
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Fungus is always iffy: It's very hard to tell beforehand what might clean up well and what not.

    I've managed to clean some quite heavy cases of fungus, leaving no trace at all.
    I've also seen some light cases of fungus which deeply etched coatings, etc...

    Get a rough estimate on a service, then you can decide how much you want to gamble.

    You could also try the classic "leave-it-without-caps-on-a-windowsill" method.
    That *might* kill the fungus (UV light). Lots of debate over how much (and which) lenses actually let UV light through....
     
  3. Hamster

    Hamster Member

    Messages:
    202
    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Shooter:
    Med. Format Pan
    I have been trying to get hold of that lens for years already and I would definitely have it serviced if I can even get hold of one.

    The main deciding factor is wether the fungus you had damages coating or not.
     
  4. Cymen

    Cymen Member

    Messages:
    25
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2006
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I've sent a 50mm f1.2 lens to Eric H. at www.pentaxs.com for a CLA. I was happy with the work. I have the same lens as you except in K mount that is badly infested. I'm trying to decide if I'm going to try it myself or send it out. I would say it is well worth fixing. I have another copy of the 85mm f1.8 in K mount that is in great shape and it is a really good lens. It has the typical issues with lenses from that era -- occasional CA, etc. But wide open it is very sharp and I like the bokeh.

    Samples from my Flickr account: http://www.flickr.com/photos/cymen/tags/smcpk85mmf18/ (all digital)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2009
  5. Pumal

    Pumal Member

    Messages:
    580
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Shoot a couple of rolls and decide if you like the results.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2009
  6. C A Sugg

    C A Sugg Member

    Messages:
    192
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2005
    Location:
    Richmond, VA
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I thought about the "portrait" possiblities with it in it's present state. I probably should run some film through it anyway, just to make sure that the iris is closing fast enough. I've got an H series body that is going to Eric for overhaul, so I'll send the lens along for an opinion as well.