How do you determine exposure for backlighting

Discussion in 'Exposure Discussion' started by Claire Senft, Apr 14, 2005.

  1. Claire Senft

    Claire Senft Member

    Messages:
    3,242
    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Location:
    Milwaukee, W
    Shooter:
    35mm
    What methods are you using to determine exposure and SBR, to establish a developing time, with conditions of backlighting?

    I find this to be a troublesome situation.
     
  2. Ornello

    Ornello Inactive

    Messages:
    295
    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2005
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    Meter using the incident method for the shadow area. Expose and develop normally. That's all there is to it.
     
  3. KenS

    KenS Member

    Messages:
    378
    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
     
  4. Jeremy

    Jeremy Member

    Messages:
    2,767
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Location:
    Denton, TX
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Thanks Ken, I'll try this out. I have always wondered a quantified manner in which to measure backlighting with an incident meter--before it was guesstimation (which was pretty close most of the time, but not all of the time).
     
  5. Jorge

    Jorge Inactive

    Messages:
    4,532
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2002
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    Claire, I use the incident method. For the low value I point the dome towards the camera, for the high value I point it towards the light source. I determine the high values by getting closer or further away from the light source. This is how I did the refractory shot. This BTW was a 37 minute shot and I measure the highlight at the frame of the window...I wanted the "glow" from it to be infectios. If I wanted the window more defined I would have gotten closer to the window so that it would have indicated a higher value and the corresponding lower development.....
     
  6. Claire Senft

    Claire Senft Member

    Messages:
    3,242
    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Location:
    Milwaukee, W
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Jorge, that is in line with what I am looking for. With backlight and the meter pointed in the direction the camera is facing, there is little difference betwenn the shielded and unshielded meter dome.
     
  7. Jorge

    Jorge Inactive

    Messages:
    4,532
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2002
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    I rarely shield the dome...when I want more detail in the dark parts I just get the dome deeper in the shadows. Of course, when I cannot get close to the subjetc, shielding is the only option.
     
  8. rogueish

    rogueish Member

    Messages:
    877
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Location:
    3rd Rock
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I thought the dome was the sheild!?
    Could you explain this part to me?
     
  9. Jorge

    Jorge Inactive

    Messages:
    4,532
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2002
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    This is something done mainly by those using the BTZS, to meter the "shadows" we sometimes shield the dome with our hand or gray card to simulate the shadows present on a scene.
     
  10. rbarker

    rbarker Member

    Messages:
    2,222
    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Location:
    Rio Rancho,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I usually use some combination of incident and multiple spot reflective readings to determine exposure placement and the correponding development plan. The exact method depends, I think, on the subject and the nature of the backlighting, plus whether supplemental lighting (fill) is possible and/or desireable. "Backlighting" includes a lot of variable situations.

    For example, a backlit portrait or model shot would be handled much differently than an image of a translucent object where the light transmitted through the object might determine its luminance value. With the former, I start with a spot reading of the face, and adjust that to place skin tone values; then incident-meter the back light to see what that's going to do with hair, etc. If the difference is too great, I might add a reflector or fill flash to bring up the light level on the subject. For the latter, a spot reflective metering of the translucent area, adjusted to place its tonality might be given precedence.
     
  11. Max Power

    Max Power Member

    Messages:
    598
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Location:
    Aylmer, QC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    OT:

    Jorge, I just have to tell you that your photograph is stunning, as in jaw-droppingly amazingly gorgeous...and that's on a crappy little computer monitor!

    OK, we will now return you to your previously scheduled broadcast :wink:

    Kent