How to realign my enlarger?

Discussion in 'Enlarging' started by Mike Kennedy, Sep 7, 2007.

  1. Mike Kennedy

    Mike Kennedy Member

    Messages:
    1,595
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Location:
    Eastern Cana
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I picked up a nice old Omega B-22 this summer at a yard sale.How do I go about aligning the unit?

    Thanks Much
     
  2. jnanian

    jnanian Advertiser Advertiser

    Messages:
    20,234
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2003
    Location:
    local
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    hi mike

    i don't know if your b-22 is like my d3 .. but
    i just use a big level and make sure all the "stages" are level.
    on the d3, there are screws ( thumbscrews? ) that you can loosen/tighten.
    check out classic-enlargers.com and search "align" and i you will be able to get exact instructions.

    good luck!
    john
     
  3. Jim Jones

    Jim Jones Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,453
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Location:
    Rural NW MO
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    For alignment, a strip of clear film with one surface lightly sanded with both course and fine sandpaper makes a nice test film. Slightly loosen the two screws on each side below the negative carrier. Adjust the enlarging head so the scratches appear sharp in all four corners of the image on the baseboard with the lens wide open.

    I used B-22s for years, and really liked them. For 35mm negaqtives, there should be a supplementary condenser lens sitting on top of the two big condensers. Other than that, they work much like most other enlargers.
     
  4. emerson531

    emerson531 Member

    Messages:
    20
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Shooter:
    35mm
    B-22 and alignment

    The sad news is that there is provision to only partially align a B-22!
    Loosen the screws that hold the negative stage and make it parallel to the base board. That leaves the Lens stage un-adjusted. If you are LUCKY the lens stage IS parallel with the Negative stage. If not to have to fool around stuffing shims between the lens board and the lens stage.

    Good luck! This is one reason to pick up a good OMEGA used D5
     
  5. Mike Kennedy

    Mike Kennedy Member

    Messages:
    1,595
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Location:
    Eastern Cana
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    The replies were most appreciated.
    I tried your scratched film tec. Jim and it worked like a charm.Looks like everything is a go.

    Mike
     
  6. dancqu

    dancqu Member

    Messages:
    3,676
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2002
    Location:
    Willamette V
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I've used a similar technique save for the outline of
    an empty negative carrier taking the place of a negative.
    I also check the projected image for square. If a square
    projects square then the enlarger is aligned. Of course
    a sharp image is needed to check for square. Dan
     
  7. Jim Jones

    Jim Jones Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,453
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Location:
    Rural NW MO
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Emerson531 is right. Adjusting only the negative stage does not insure that lens, negative stage, and baseboard are all parallel. However, it does let one get all four corners into sharp focus. Imprecise parallelism should rarely cause conspicuous distortion. I've had to shim between the column and baseboard in some enlargers for additional correction, but the B-22s seem to have sturdy baseboards.
     
  8. DKT

    DKT Member

    Messages:
    504
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    are you sure you can't align the lens stage? I don't use a B22, but have a couple of old D2s and you can align the whole carriage part in addition to the neg stage. The part that holds the lens boards, is aligned by rotating these plastic wheels that run up & down the column-if you loosen the screws that hold those in place, they're actually offset, so if you turn the wheels around, you can adjust the carriage from front to back. You align that part, then you do the negative stage. If you need to adjust laterally, there's a similar provision...