Leica 135 f4.5, far from a great lens

Discussion in '35mm Cameras and Accessories' started by sandholm, Mar 15, 2011.

  1. sandholm

    sandholm Subscriber

    Messages:
    232
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Location:
    Switzerland
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Hi,

    I have a Leica’s Ernst Leitz Hektor 135mm f/4.5 and I have never really liked the result from it. Lens flare as soon as the sun comes out, the colors are dull, soft result (but not in a good way according to me).

    Well, the people at leicarumors made a review, and its pretty good review, so I thought some of you might like to read it. Check it out: http://leicarumors.com/2011/03/14/leicas-ernst-leitz-hektor-135mm-f4-5-lens-review.aspx/

    cheers
     
  2. softshock

    softshock Member

    Messages:
    70
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    I think that review is very unfair. First off, it's done completely in the digital realm. Second off, it's being compared to a modern Leica lens which sells for thousands more! My Hektor is a very good and sharp lens for how little they cost. Who uses a 135 with a Leica anyway?!
     
  3. ntenny

    ntenny Member

    Messages:
    2,284
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Location:
    San Diego, C
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I have this lens and I kinda like it, although admittedly I've never used it in colour. It is flare-prone, it's not dead sharp, but on the whole I find I get images I like from it anyway. I've mostly used it indoors with fast film, which mitigates the flare problems.

    -NT
     
  4. Rol_Lei Nut

    Rol_Lei Nut Member

    Messages:
    1,118
    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    Location:
    Hamburg
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Though the Soviet Jupiter 11 is smaller, cheaper (probably) faster (f/4.0), *very probably* sharper (mine is very sharp), isn't especially prone to flare and has a wonderful "Zeisish" look to boot!
    A good example of what Zeiss was up to already in the 1930's. Admittedly, as with all SU/FSU equipment, buying one is a bit of Russian roulette (pun intended), but basically I see no reason to go for the Hector.

    Not everything Leica made was solid gold and especially earlier lenses tended to be far behind Zeiss.
     
  5. MaximusM3

    MaximusM3 Member

    Messages:
    756
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Location:
    NY
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    I use my Tele Elmar 135 quite often and absolutely love it. Did own a Hektor a while back but it was a fight and not worth it most of the time. All 135s, aside from the Hektor, are fabulous lenses and dirt cheap today (not the newer APO obviously). If you can focus correctly, which can be a challenge at times, they are spectacular for portraits and landscape.
     
  6. elekm

    elekm Member

    Messages:
    2,059
    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Location:
    New Jersey (
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    I'll make no attempt hide my disdain for these idiot rumor sites.

    They're about as accurate as the Jan. 1 psychics who make their annual predictions. They're bound to get something right once in a while.

    I would give no credence to anything that they have to say, including a product review.
     
  7. Mustafa Umut Sarac

    Mustafa Umut Sarac Member

    Messages:
    4,571
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Location:
    İstanbul
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    You did not like because your lens have a problem or you could not see the quality. If your lens in perfect condition and you dont like it , I bet you are a holga photographer.
     
  8. sandholm

    sandholm Subscriber

    Messages:
    232
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Location:
    Switzerland
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Well, i dont see the problem to use digital here to compare the two lenses. One is 50 years old then the other one, and a price different of 2000 euro but I think its faire to use them in a comparison as long as this is given. So i dont see the test as "look how much better this lens is" but instead just to see what a modern lens give VS a 50 year old lens (they had to pick a lens so why not go with what exist today).

    Thats cool, i have actually never used it indoor, have to try that out. On the other hand not that oftan I have a situuation that demands a 135 indoor... but that only means I have to come up with one.

    Well, i dont like the rummors, but you can look at the images and just judge the result, thats what I did.... a test is a test

    Do you have any constructive to say or cant you just understand English? I dont tink my lens has a problem, but personal I decide what is quality and not the letters that are printed on the front of the lens. This lens is 50 years old, it will not be the quality we expect of Leica today. I use Leica but that dosent mean that I like every thing that comes out from the Leica factory, for example the M5 and M6 I never liked, nor did I like the M8 or any of the R1-6, and there are some lenses that I just didnt like the look they gave. Stop being such a brand whore when it comes to Leica. Somehow you have got stuck on the idea that everything that Leica do is super quality and a mark of luxury which its fare from. I hope you enjoy your canon eos 1000 + ef 35-70 and your "fuji 10 dollar camera"

    And for the Holga remark, I have seen better photographs from people using Holgas than I have seen from certain Leica brand wh%re, so certainly equipment is not everything.


    Take the review for what it is, personal i never liked the color rendering nor the soft image the 135 liked and I thought i could be fun to see a comparison of a 50 year or lens to a modern.

    cheers
     
  9. Mustafa Umut Sarac

    Mustafa Umut Sarac Member

    Messages:
    4,571
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Location:
    İstanbul
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    Sandholm ,

    You are a Holga photographer not more.

    Umut
     
  10. dnjl

    dnjl Member

    Messages:
    376
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2010
    Location:
    Switzerland
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Seriously, a little respect towards other people and their opinions will do you no harm. If you really believe what you say, then you should back up your statements with according photographs to prove your point.
     
  11. lxdude

    lxdude Member

    Messages:
    6,940
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Location:
    Redlands, So
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Well, I think the comparison in regards to optical quality is inherently unfair, in light of age and cost. I don't think the review is, though. The reviewer stated being willing to overlook the lens' weaknesses, given its age and price, and validates it as a cheap alternative to the latest and greatest high dollar 135 for occasional use.
     
  12. sandholm

    sandholm Subscriber

    Messages:
    232
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Location:
    Switzerland
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    If you want to quote, then do it correct, I said
    ? What are you trying to say, because that dosent even make sense.

    For your information I havent tried a Holga camera yet, but Leica brand enthusiasts like you makes me want to sell all my Leica gear because you completely destroy the brand and the fun using it.

    cheers
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 16, 2011