Life of film 120 vs 135

Discussion in 'B&W: Film, Paper, Chemistry' started by GeoffHill, Dec 14, 2007.

  1. GeoffHill

    GeoffHill Member

    Messages:
    298
    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Location:
    Newcastle, E
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Hi all.

    I've just recieved a pile of film from Silverprint, (FP4 and D3200) where the expiry on the 120 film is around mid 2009. This matches previouse 120 HP5 film, which has always had about 20 months or so until expiry.

    However all of the FP4 and HP5 film I have purchaced in the last few months, has had an expiry of around 2011, seemingly twice as long as the roll film.

    Is 120 film shorter lived than 135, or have I been consistently recieving 2 year old 120 film. Is this because the metal cartridge for 135 film provides better protection for the film?

    I've only ordered from silverprint and 7dayshop previously, so I find it hard to believe that either of them have such common films sitting on the shelf for 2 years, as they would need mightily big shelves.

    Geoff
     
  2. david b

    david b Member

    Messages:
    4,031
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Location:
    None of your
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    The 120 might be older stock.

    Just put the stuff in the fridge and don't worry about it.

    I am about to shoot some Agfapan 100 that expired in 1985.
     
  3. Jim Jones

    Jim Jones Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,390
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Location:
    Rural NW MO
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Last night I shot a sheet of 4x5 T-Max 100 with a 1995 expiry. It had been stored for room temperature for most of the time. Base fog was negligible, and the exposure index was slightly lower than metered. Image quality seems good, but it hasn't been printed yet. T-Max 3200 doesn't keep well. Tech Pan seemed to last forever.
     
  4. PhotoJim

    PhotoJim Member

    Messages:
    2,223
    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2005
    Location:
    Regina, SK,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Ilford no doubt sells a lot more 35mm film than 120. They likely do 120 in less frequent batches, which will give them better economies of scale in manufacturing (reducing the cost per roll for them and for us) but causing some lag in sale as the batches are sold.
     
  5. Dave Miller

    Dave Miller Member

    Messages:
    3,894
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Location:
    Middle Engla
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I suspect the emulsion on 120 film is formulated to give best results with earlier use. Manufacturers assume that it will be used quickly by professional or high use amateurs. On the other hand 35mm is formulated for a long shelf life as a priority.
     
  6. Silverhead

    Silverhead Member

    Messages:
    277
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Location:
    Southern Cal
    Shooter:
    Plastic Cameras
    Agreed. The fridge takes all the worries out of issues like this. :smile:
     
  7. Snapshot

    Snapshot Member

    Messages:
    913
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Location:
    Toronto, Ont
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I agree that the film is likely older stock. I imagine 120 film would not have the same volume of sales as 135. However, I've noted that some 120 films have differing development times than their 135 counterpart. Is it just due to developing to differing contrast or is there a slight formulation variance at play? Hmmm....
     
  8. MattKing

    MattKing Subscriber

    Messages:
    16,811
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Location:
    Delta, BC, Canada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    The paper backing on roll film, and the lack of a plastic storage cannister, might have a statistical effect on it's longevity.

    Just a thought.

    Matt
     
  9. AgX

    AgX Member

    Messages:
    11,921
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2007
    Location:
    Germany
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    That production scale argument is convincing.

    However, as Matt hinted at, type 120 and type 135 are different systems. Films are quite delicate items and parts of the system which will not draw the attention of a consumer could be effective to longevity.
     
  10. tim_walls

    tim_walls Member

    Messages:
    1,044
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Location:
    Bucuresti, R
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I think it's highly unlikely (indeed, utterly implausible) that they manufacture a different emulsion for 120 than 35mm because 120 is 'more professional.'

    Fewer people buy 120. It sits on shelves longer. End of story.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 14, 2007
  11. David A. Goldfarb

    David A. Goldfarb Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    17,940
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2002
    Location:
    Honolulu, Ha
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    120 is on a thinner base, so that may be a factor.

    Of course, you can only get one Christmas on a roll of 120, but you can fit three Christmases on a roll of 35mm.
     
  12. GeoffHill

    GeoffHill Member

    Messages:
    298
    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Location:
    Newcastle, E
    Shooter:
    35mm

    I have 4 types of ilford 120 film in my fridge (D100, D3200, Fp4 and Hp5) and they all have dates between Feb and July 2009. They are from 4 different suppilers. If the life of the 120 film is the same as the 35mm (about 4 years) ilford must have gone on a production fest about 2 years ago...