Mamiya 23

Discussion in 'Medium Format Cameras and Accessories' started by ronlamarsh, Jun 30, 2006.

  1. ronlamarsh

    ronlamarsh Member

    Messages:
    462
    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Location:
    Seattle Wash
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Am considering getting one of these. I have the opportunity to pickup one in mint condition with polaroid back and 100m lens for $350 and another $100 gets me a 55mm lens to boot. Any thoughts out there? Pitfalls? I would be getting a 6x9 rollfilm back to use with it.
     
  2. Paul Howell

    Paul Howell Member

    Messages:
    2,803
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Location:
    Phoeinx Ariz
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I have a Mamiya Universal with the 100, 55, and 150 lens, very sharp lens, the camera is rugged, my only complaint over the years is having to cock the shutter. Does the 23 have a roll film back, if not you will need one.
     
  3. kb244

    kb244 Member

    Messages:
    816
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2005
    Location:
    Grand Rapids
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I'm not familiar with the camera, but "6x9 rollback" I assume you just mean basic 120? (120/220 dont define the size, the camera does, as 120 can be put into 6x4.5, 6x6, 6x7, 6x9, 6x12 format cameras).

    But if you want a mamiya medium format SLR, you can get a Mamiya 645 outfit for under 400$, heck you can get a Mamiya RB67 outfit for under 300$

    Hopefully someone more familiar with the camera will pop on.
     
  4. jimgalli

    jimgalli Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,571
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2002
    Location:
    Tonopah Neva
    Shooter:
    ULarge Format
    I still have a complete Mamiya universal camera system. It's so good I've never had the heart to sell it, especially at today's prices. They never made a 55 for it, that's likely a '65mm'. Excellent little lens but press the guy for the 'finder'. They used a seperate finder for the wide angles that clipped on top of the camera. I have 20X30's on permanent display done with that camera and Velvia 50. Check prices for similar cameras sold recently on Ebay. The lever wind backs are better than the roll wind ones.
     
  5. Dan Fromm

    Dan Fromm Member

    Messages:
    4,203
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Jim, it unlikely that the OP was thinking of a 50, but if he can snag one of themfor $100, WOW!
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 30, 2006
  6. jimgalli

    jimgalli Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,571
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2002
    Location:
    Tonopah Neva
    Shooter:
    ULarge Format
    My thoughts exactly. 65 is a nice lens. 50 is spectacular. Prices reflect same.
     
  7. dmax

    dmax Member

    Messages:
    110
    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2006
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Jim,
    If the time comes when you decide to let go of the 50, drop me a line. Considering how much you've described its performance in different fora over these years, I am truly intrigued. If I recall one of your posts elsewhere, you describe the 50 as a Biogon design. I'll trade you a bucketful of vintage brass lenses for it (various lineages), and maybe even some cash!
     
  8. ann

    ann Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,923
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2002
    Shooter:
    35mm
    i have a universal 23 plus a variety of lens including the 50, it is built like a sherman tank and i really love using it. Haven't done so, in a while but it is a classic from the 60's.

    350 may be a bit high for today's prices, but in mint condition who knows.

    A variety of backs are available ; 6x6, 6x7, and 6x9 and are still available.

    Very sharp lens
     
  9. canuhead

    canuhead Member

    Messages:
    660
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Location:
    Southern Ont
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Have a Universal and Super 23 , use the Universal more.

    Just a bit confused tho, are you sure it's a 23 you're looking at because the Universals were the only ones to accept Polaroid backs afaik. Unless someone did a mod on it...

    Agree with everyone else though, really great images from it and if you can find them, try and get a Horseman 6x9 or Grafmatic rh8 or rh10 holder for it. These backs are much smaller than the Mamiya roll film backs for the press cameras.

    As for the 55 (or 50 or 65), definitely get it ! But as Jim, said, GET the finder if they have it.
     
  10. canuhead

    canuhead Member

    Messages:
    660
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Location:
    Southern Ont
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Oh yeah, your left arm wil look like Popeye's after a couple of weeks use of this camera lol :wink:
     
  11. gordrob

    gordrob Subscriber

    Messages:
    452
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Location:
    Western Cana
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I love the 6x9 negative that you get from the Mamiya - especially with the 65mm lens. It's built to take alot of abuse and is not all that heavy. I have three backs so I carry B&W, Colour Neg and Transparency film -it's easy to change from one film to another. But like others have mentioned before - make sure you get the finder for the 65 or 50mm lens

    Gord