Neutral density filter

Discussion in 'B&W: Film, Paper, Chemistry' started by Weldon, Jan 22, 2005.

  1. Weldon

    Weldon Member

    Messages:
    18
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Location:
    Wilmington N
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I aquired a 4X neutral density filter and thought it would increse exposure time by 4 stops...I was wrong. Each neg was underexposed. Shoud I have tried 4 times the exposure time?
     
  2. glbeas

    glbeas Member

    Messages:
    3,307
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2002
    Location:
    Roswell, Ga.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Was the exposure long enough for reciprocity failure to occur? Or were you opening the lens by 4 stops instead of extending the time? A few details will help here. A 4x ND does cut the light by 4 stops.
     
  3. Nick Zentena

    Nick Zentena Member

    Messages:
    4,677
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Location:
    Italia
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    4 stops is 16 times the time. 2x2x2x2. I thought the ND filters labeled 4x were actually 2 stops. I'm confused how you ended up with underexposure unless it's reciprocity failure.

    How did you meter?
     
  4. Weldon

    Weldon Member

    Messages:
    18
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Location:
    Wilmington N
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I was using a old Rollie T1 that has a meter on the side. The exposure was 15 seconds so I don't think it was reciprocity. The straight exposure should have been F11 at 1/30 sec. I stepped it down to F22 at 15 seconds using the nd filter plus a red filter that I step down 2 stops for. I use the red filter very often at 2 steps down but the nd filter is new.
     
  5. fschifano

    fschifano Member

    Messages:
    3,216
    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Location:
    Valley Strea
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    A 4x ND filter will cost you two stops of light. You should have opened up to f/5.6 to account for the two stops of light lost to the ND filter. Then you need another 2 stops to compensate for the red filter. Keeping the shutter speed the same at 15 sec, you'd need to open up the aperture another two stops to f/2.8. You were going in the wrong direction! Don't feel too badly about this. Happens to all of us at one time or another. Keep at it.
     
  6. Nick Zentena

    Nick Zentena Member

    Messages:
    4,677
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Location:
    Italia
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I don't think that's right. He said the meter read F/11 at 1/30th. Going to F/22 should have moved the time to 1/8th. Then the ND filter moves it to 1/2. Then the red filter to 2 seconds. I don't know what film was used but from 2 seconds to 15 isn't the worlds best long exposure response. The film was still underexposed? I'm thinking it's something else. No idea what.
     
  7. gainer

    gainer Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,725
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    At 15 seconds indicated exposure time you were well into the region where reciprocity isn't reciprocal. You don't say what film you were using, but the exposure would have to be 21 seconds for 100Delta, 24 econds for 100 or 400 TMX or HP5+ and 30 seconds for 400TX. These are the latest emulsions.
     
  8. Weldon

    Weldon Member

    Messages:
    18
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Location:
    Wilmington N
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    TMax 100 metered at ISO 100. Please explain how you came to 24 sec Gainer.
     
  9. Kirk Keyes

    Kirk Keyes Member

    Messages:
    3,267
    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    What are the marking on the ND filter. I believe that ND filters are usually marked with their optical density. If you have a ND filter, and it says "ND 4.0" then it is not 4x, and not 4 stops, but 4.0 density. So 4.0/0.3=13.3 stops. That would lead to some very underexposed negs. Using this system, a filter that is 4 stops, would say ND 1.2.

    If yours is a 4x, then it may have ND 0.6 on it. If so, then that needs only 2 stops additional exposure.

    So what exactly does your filter have marked on it?
     
  10. Weldon

    Weldon Member

    Messages:
    18
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Location:
    Wilmington N
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    It is a Rollei filter that was made in Germany. It says "grau 4" and -4 on the filter and the box.
     
  11. Huub S

    Huub S Member

    Messages:
    194
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Shooter:
    ULarge Format
    My guess is that the ND-filter is indeed a 4-stop filter, when the negatives are not way underexposed. In that case it's Kirk made the right analyses.
    The underexposure is probably caused by not compensating for the reciprocity factor of your film. Starting with F11 and 1/30, closing down to F22 would give 1/8. Adding a red filter (2.5 stops) would give something like F16.5 at 1/2 sec. Adding the ND filter for 4 stops should give F16.5 at 8 sec, or F22 at 12 sec. This time should be compansated for to about 20 sec. using TMax100.
     
  12. Weldon

    Weldon Member

    Messages:
    18
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Location:
    Wilmington N
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Thank all for responding. Did a very simple test this morning...tmax 100/120 at F16 metered without filters at 1/125. My red filter is optimum at -2 stops or F16 at 1/30. Adding ND filter (bayonet mount) to red and assuming the -4 stop assumption; F16 at 2 sec. Bracketed roll, same image (contrasty sunny and shadow) went from -4 stop to -12. -6 stops (using both filters) was detailed but would be difficult to print (underexposed). -12 was still detailed though overexposed. I found -10 to be dead on. Which would make it a -8 filter in my test...I guess. Dev in Rodinal at 1:50 for 13 min.