New Polaroid Cameras

Discussion in 'Miscellaneous Equipment' started by david b, May 12, 2004.

  1. david b

    david b Member

    Messages:
    4,031
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Location:
    None of your
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
  2. Andre R. de Avillez

    Andre R. de Avillez Member

    Messages:
    965
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Man, if that's a professional camera, I would hate to see an amateur one (f/10 max aperture? 3 element plastic lens? is this competition for Holga?)
     
  3. pierre

    pierre Member

    Messages:
    97
    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2003
    Location:
    Ottawa
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Polaroid was a pioneer in plastic lenses. They are quite good, and certainly good enough for what the instant Spectra-type film can deliver.
     
  4. blansky

    blansky Subscriber

    Messages:
    5,974
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Location:
    Wine country, N. Cal.
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    This is an interesting question.

    Have we got the technology to produce plastic to the level of glass now.

    Obviously anything plastic a few years ago was considered junk. I'm wondering if we have reached a stage where plastic can come close to the quality of glass. Both are man made manufactured products and what is to say that at least one day plastic could not replace glass.


    Just asking.


    Michael McBlane
     
  5. Tom Duffy

    Tom Duffy Member

    Messages:
    963
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2002
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Don't some lens companies mold aspherical plastic surfaces onto a spherical glass lens elements as a way of drastically reducing the cost of aspherical lenses?
     
  6. jd callow

    jd callow Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    8,003
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Location:
    Milan
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I wonder if a better question might be:
    Have we lowered the bar to such a degree that plastic lenses are professional grade?
     
  7. jd callow

    jd callow Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    8,003
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Location:
    Milan
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I agree that the lens is probably the equal of the film. What really bothers me is that the camera is labeled professional. I doubt there are many 'Pros' who would use this thing. Meanwhile, some sucker who loved his dad's Polaroid folder is going to buy this and be very disappointed/mis-lead.


    I get some beautiful polaroids from P/N 55. Quality I am hard pressed to believe could be equalled with a plastic lens. I have an old polaroid folder that gives great images -- I suspect much better than this camera. They have the goods to build a true pro camera, but I suspect they figure producing a consumer camera and calling it Professional is more profitable.

    It isn't worth getting upset over. It is just annoying.
     
  8. jd callow

    jd callow Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    8,003
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Location:
    Milan
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I suspect there is and I also suspect that it is cheaper than a digiCam. I also would love nothing more than to see Polaroid succeed and keep developing new and better product.
     
  9. Tom Duffy

    Tom Duffy Member

    Messages:
    963
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2002
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Maybe it's only going to be used by fine art photograpers, not professionals.

    Tom "they use Holgas" Duffy
     
  10. jd callow

    jd callow Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    8,003
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Location:
    Milan
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Then wouldn't they have called it the polaroid 1200 dye transfer, unsharp mask azo print alternate process fine art platinum?
     
  11. Nige

    Nige Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,133
    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    how about the digital LCD viewfinder...