Nikon F55 Should I or shouldn't I?

Discussion in '35mm Cameras and Accessories' started by Andy K, Nov 10, 2004.

  1. Andy K

    Andy K Member

    Messages:
    9,422
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    Location:
    Sunny Southe
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I've been looking for a cheap way into Nikon cameras for a while. At £179.00 new, I can now afford a Nikon F55 with a 28-100mm AF lens.

    Should I go for it? Are there any problems etc I should look out for? Any advice from experienced Nikon owners would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
     
  2. Fintan

    Fintan Member

    Messages:
    1,793
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2004
    Location:
    Ireland
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I've bought 2 for presents in the last year, they are really good IMHO
    You can get them even cheaper than that. About £150 in Warehouse Express.
     
  3. Andy K

    Andy K Member

    Messages:
    9,422
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    Location:
    Sunny Southe
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Thanks Fintan. The only thing making me unsure is the 'polycarbonate' lens mount. I would prefer metal.
     
  4. Dave Parker

    Dave Parker Inactive

    Messages:
    4,049
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2004
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Howdy,

    I know over the years that I worked in photo stores, there was concerned express over the poly lens mounts, and I even had concern about a Minolta with a poly mount that I purchased for my wife, but in many years of using it and working with customers who purchased the cameras with the poly lens mounts, I have never seen one fail, I imagine it could be damaged easier than a metal one, I have just never seen it happen.

    Dave Parker
    Satin Snow(TM) Ground Glass
     
  5. sparx

    sparx Member

    Messages:
    376
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2004
    Location:
    Norfolk UK
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I borrowed a friend's F55 for a day a while back. It wasn't my cup of tea as it is very light compared to my OM and I like my cameras to have a bit of weight, but it done the job. I don't have much expereince with autofocus but it seemed quick enough in daylight conditions. One thing I was less sure about was the controls in full manual mode, I found them less intuitive than the EOS300V I tried at the same time. I'm sure i'd have got used to it over time but, at the end of the day, I decided to stick with my Olympus for now.
     
  6. L Gebhardt

    L Gebhardt Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,769
    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Location:
    NH
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    A major problem is that you can't manually set the film speed. This will make shooting black and white a real pain. I would look for a used N/F80 instead, which is the cheapest AF Nikon with user settable film speed. I have a N80 and I can also say it is a very nice camera.
     
  7. clogz

    clogz Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,842
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Location:
    Rotterdam, T
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    The things to look for, as in my opinion they are important depth of field preview, manual overrride of filmspeed, manual exposure programme and manual focussing.
     
  8. Andy K

    Andy K Member

    Messages:
    9,422
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    Location:
    Sunny Southe
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I currently have all those in my Praktica BX20 and my Olympus OM10...

    However I wish to move on to Nikon, for the great lenses. They now have an entry level camera I can afford, the F55, however having read more about it I am now not so sure, for example it has no cable release socket, instead it has a little 'remote', this is getting too 'gizmo-ish' for me.

    So I shall revise my question. What is the lowest priced/most readily available Nikon camera which has fully manual options for everything? ie, focus, speed, ISO, wind and rewind? DOF preview is not so important as I can calculate that.
     
  9. Fintan

    Fintan Member

    Messages:
    1,793
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2004
    Location:
    Ireland
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I misread that you are going to use it. I think you would find this basic, you have to remember that this is Nikons entry level SLR and for beginners to photography. I think you should look at the second hand market for a higher spec nikon.
     
  10. L Gebhardt

    L Gebhardt Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,769
    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Location:
    NH
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    New, I think the lowest priced camera that meets your listed requirments is the FM10 (all manual). If you also want autofocus then you need to go to at least the N80.
     
  11. Fintan

    Fintan Member

    Messages:
    1,793
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2004
    Location:
    Ireland
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    take a look at the F80 and see if its more like what you want
    heres some info
     
  12. Dean Williams

    Dean Williams Member

    Messages:
    212
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2004
    Location:
    Northern Ida
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    If you want a new camera with auto focus along with ISO, cable release and DOF it's going to have to be the N80/F80. A very good camera. If you want new and manual it's the FM10 or for (a lot) more money the FM3a. You can do better price wise by finding a good condition FE2 or FM2, depending on if you want exposure automation. Neither has autofocus, but both have fairly bright screens that make manual focus easy. They are both better cameras than any of the others with the exception of the FM3a, which is a basically a combination of the two. If you do get the '55 you can still change the film speed using exposure comp, if I remember correctly. Also, older Nikons in the autofocus range, like the N6006 or N8008s are good values, and you can find them in like new condition at low prices, especially the 6006. Very sturdy, and cheap to boot. You can get one for less than the '55. A lot of camera for the money.
     
  13. TPPhotog

    TPPhotog Member

    Messages:
    3,042
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Here's another vote for a used F80 if you want one of the latest Nikon's. Sadly I sold off mine a few weeks ago for £200 mint condition, but there's plenty on the market at around that price. Get a black one though as the silver look does rub and looks tatty.
     
  14. olecowboy

    olecowboy Member

    Messages:
    27
    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2003
    Location:
    New Brunswic
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I too would recommend the F80. I have both the 55 and the 80 and use the 80 as my main shooter with the 55 in a backup role. Not being able to manually set the film speed is an irritant with the f55. You can overcome it to some degree with the +/- but it is still a bother. The f80 is a good solid camera that works just as well in manual as automatic. You can probably get a good one on ebay for little more than you're thiinking of paying for the f55.
     
  15. Jon Luebke

    Jon Luebke Member

    Messages:
    3
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Location:
    Detroit
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I would recommend staying away from any odd-numbered 2-digit Nikon camera. The mid spec cameras always end in "0", like F80, F90, F100 -- you will do well with those. The F65, F75, etc. are the low end consumer rigs, with inferior build quality and reduced feature sets. Among the things you'll give up is the ability to set your own film speed (DX only), and you will be stuck with only "Idiot mode" exposure control such as Landscape, portrait, sports, etc.

    Also, I would stay away from the 28-100, no matter what body you buy. It has a plastic lens mount, and the most recent edition of the Nikon Compendium rated it as perhaps the worst lens Nikon ever made. Now, I don't believe everything I read, but in my opinion, the information in that particular tome is accurate and fair. Suggest you look at an F80 and perhaps a later model 24-120 lens.
     
  16. Andy K

    Andy K Member

    Messages:
    9,422
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    Location:
    Sunny Southe
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Thanks for all the help and suggestions folks. I have decided to hangfire on the F55, wait til I have a bit more money set aside and then go for a better model. Possibly the F80 or F90.


    That polycarb lens mount really does put me off from the F55, there may be no instances of them failing, but I really would prefer a proper metal lens mount.
     
  17. Art Vandalay

    Art Vandalay Member

    Messages:
    287
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Location:
    Vancouver BC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I'd recommend an FM2 for entry into Nikon, especially since it and the lenses are still quite common used. It's a beautiful and basic metal camera.
     
  18. fred

    fred Member

    Messages:
    1,471
    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Location:
    Belgium
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    A basic hybrid camera with all what you need and nothing too much.
    FM3A with a 24mm or 28mm.
    Go for it!
    A camera for the next thirty years. :smile:
    A beauty.

    Fred
     
  19. John Koehrer

    John Koehrer Subscriber

    Messages:
    6,384
    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Location:
    Montgomery,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Andy:
    Another rec. to stay away from the poly carb lens mount. I've seen several of them fail from careless handling. The 28-105 is an excellent all around lens with great close focus capability.
    Body FM2n, FM3. Solid & dependable.
     
  20. bkorites

    bkorites Member

    Messages:
    9
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I have an FM10. I also have a Nikon 8008, Leica Z2x and a Sony 717 dc. The camera that gets the most use is the FM10. I got it new from B&H for $209 new then I took off the zoom lens it comes with and put on a new Nikkor 50mm f1.8, which is one of the sharpest lenses made by anyone and it cost only $110 at B&H new.

    The advantages of the FM10 are it's fully manual. The only thing dependent on the battery is the light meter. It's also light and compact. It focuses easily with the split image viewfinder. It also has a metal lens mount. The pictures I get out of it are the equal of any I have ever taken.

    The only thing missing is display of shutter speed, aperture, etc in the viewfinder. But after using it a while you get used to it. I usually leave it set at f5.6 (sharpest stop for the 50/1.8) with the shutter speed at 1/125 and the focus at infinity. If I have to open or close the aperture or move the speed up or down, it's quite easy to know where you are. Actually, having nothing in the viewfinder except what I'm shooting is a relief after all the clutter you see in a fully auto camera like the 8008.
     
  21. kjsphoto

    kjsphoto Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,322
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Shooter:
    Sub 35mm
    If you do not need Af I would get an F3HP I have one and absoutely love it. Also if you wat to go the AF route check out the F100. It is a killer camera... Also the FM10 like mentioned is a excellent camera as well and not very expensive new.

    Just my two cents,

    Kev