Nostalgia isn't what it used to be. It's more expensive now.

Discussion in 'Industry News' started by semi-ambivalent, Apr 20, 2012.

  1. semi-ambivalent

    semi-ambivalent Subscriber

    Messages:
    701
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Shooter:
    35mm
    If you stumble across this

    http://www.nikonusa.com/Nikon-Products/Camera-Lenses/Manual/index.page

    like I did you might be scratching your head, like I did. Did Nikon give up on manual focusing lenses or didn't they? Are they experiencing push-back from digital owners who don't want (or already have) a big, heavy zoom and are looking for a few small primes? You know, primes like the 24 2.8 that they've heard people rave about for the last thirty years or so. Perhaps they don't want to pay $1200+ for a 24 1.4 like a pro might be willing to. I don't know the age of this page but some of the comments are pretty recent.

    Furthermore, if they still have the tooling for these boys, what other tooling is still laying close to hand? Smart companies can make money in bad times as well as good, and without having to ramp-up for a 70s era boom. Quick, somebody give me a reality smackdown.

    s-a
     
  2. brucemuir

    brucemuir Member

    Messages:
    2,266
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    Location:
    Metro DC are
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I knew the 50 1.2 was still in production but not the others.
    Great thing about Nikkors is there are soooo many of them production wise.
     
  3. BetterSense

    BetterSense Member

    Messages:
    3,126
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Location:
    North Caroli
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Link is broken
     
  4. semi-ambivalent

    semi-ambivalent Subscriber

    Messages:
    701
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Shooter:
    35mm
    [pre]http://www.nikonusa.com/Nikon-Products/Camera-Lenses/Manual/index.page[/pre]

    It's not for my browser, but I've turned off 'parse links...' and added some probably worthless tags. Give this a shot.

    s-a
     
  5. Newt_on_Swings

    Newt_on_Swings Member

    Messages:
    2,131
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Location:
    NYC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    You'd think they would keep the ones only with the fastest apertures such as the 50 1.2 and 35 1.4 but where's the 24 and 28 f2s? only the 2.8 versions are available. 105 2.8 but why not the 85mm. Nikon you so crazzay.
     
  6. chriscrawfordphoto

    chriscrawfordphoto Member

    Messages:
    1,179
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2007
    Location:
    Fort Wayne,
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Nikon still makes small primes in their autofocus lineup too, but they don't get much promotion. I have the 24/2.8, 28/2.8, 35/2, 50/1.4, and 85/1.8 AF-D Nikkor lenses. The 50 and 85 lenses I have were recently replaced with new versions that do not have aperture rings (they work on the F5, F6, and F100 but not older film bodies), but the rest are still made in the old style with aperture ring, so they work on film or digital and work fine with manual focus Ai bodies.
     
  7. TimFox

    TimFox Member

    Messages:
    102
    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Location:
    Chicago
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    Zeiss makes an 85 mm f/1.4 in Nikon manual mount. (Expensive).
    Available at B&H.
    We sometimes use these at work on scientific video cameras that use F mount.
     
  8. brucemuir

    brucemuir Member

    Messages:
    2,266
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    Location:
    Metro DC are
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    The newish Zeiss ZF & ZE etc is a "prime" example of the original sentiment of this thread.
     
  9. CGW

    CGW Member

    Messages:
    2,797
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Are you in the market for some or what? I see 8 lenses...
     
  10. semi-ambivalent

    semi-ambivalent Subscriber

    Messages:
    701
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I own six of them. What's your point?