Not sure where to post this

Discussion in 'Landscape' started by Raffay, Jan 5, 2014.

  1. Raffay

    Raffay Member

    Messages:
    158
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2013
    Location:
    Islamabad, P
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    ImageUploadedByTapatalk1388941161.900190.jpg
    First 2014 shot, but I suppose I am still struggling to get whites and blacks. Meter readings at the base of the trunks where it is dark was 1.4, on the trunks it was 2.8 and the bright grass behind was at 5.6.

    I rated the film at 320 and overexposed by one stop. Focus is not great as the camera was not focusing not sure why. Developed in D76 stock for 9 minutes at 18 degrees.

    Would have liked more range and sharpness.

    Cheers
    Raffay


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  2. Jesper

    Jesper Subscriber

    Messages:
    743
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    Sweden
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    The Gallery is the best place to post images.
     
  3. Raffay

    Raffay Member

    Messages:
    158
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2013
    Location:
    Islamabad, P
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    I meant in which thread, since there is no trees thread available.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  4. Rick A

    Rick A Subscriber

    Messages:
    7,417
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2009
    Location:
    northern Pa.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    There is no image sharing and discussion thread here, the gallery is the best place to post images, but is for paying subscribers. Is this a scan of a negative or print? When printing, remember that time controls whites, and contrast controls blacks.
     
  5. Raffay

    Raffay Member

    Messages:
    158
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2013
    Location:
    Islamabad, P
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    This is a scan.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  6. jimjm

    jimjm Subscriber

    Messages:
    253
    Joined:
    May 2, 2007
    Location:
    San Diego CA
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Raffay - This looks like a well-exposed negative to me. You've got good detail in the shadows and no overblown highlights in the sunlight background. If this is is a straight scan of the negative, there's no reason you can't get deeper blacks and more "punch" in the image when you print in the darkroom or post-process. If you had underexposed/overdeveloped the film, you would see more contrast, but at the expense of highlight and shadow detail.

    Can't answer to your problems with sharpness except you will want to use smaller apertures to obtain enough depth-of-field throughout the scene, especially with landscape and scenery shots. If this is 35mm shot, I would shoot at no larger than say f11, which (on a 35mm lens) will means everything from 2 meters to infinity will be in focus. If you took this at 2.8 or 5.6, some areas will be unsharp, depending on where you focus. If you're using autofocus (and it's malfunctioning) I would switch to manual focus.
     
  7. Raffay

    Raffay Member

    Messages:
    158
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2013
    Location:
    Islamabad, P
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    This 4x5 but cropped, and I used f11


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  8. Bill Burk

    Bill Burk Subscriber

    Messages:
    4,984
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    This almost looks like camera movement, motion blur. But could the folding 4x5 camera have not locked properly on the front struts?
     
  9. Bill Burk

    Bill Burk Subscriber

    Messages:
    4,984
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    Hi Raffay,

    Can you post the density readings at the points where you metered?
     
  10. wildbill

    wildbill Member

    Messages:
    2,851
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2004
    Location:
    Grand Rapids
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Try f32.
     
  11. LJH

    LJH Member

    Messages:
    712
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Location:
    Australia
    Shooter:
    ULarge Format
    +1
     
  12. Raffay

    Raffay Member

    Messages:
    158
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2013
    Location:
    Islamabad, P
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    Will do.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  13. Raffay

    Raffay Member

    Messages:
    158
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2013
    Location:
    Islamabad, P
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    [​IMG]
    Trees by february71, on Flickr

    Rescanned, and cropped a little based on feedback from a member on the LFF site.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  14. Bill Burk

    Bill Burk Subscriber

    Messages:
    4,984
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    Raffay, Certainly no camera issue. It's a fine photograph and you need not make negatives any better than this!

    I think density measurements, along with meter readings (you already gave), camera settings and development time...

    There would be enough information (in terms of time/contrast) - to give you a point of reference that you can use going forward.
     
  15. Raffay

    Raffay Member

    Messages:
    158
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2013
    Location:
    Islamabad, P
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    What could have gone wrong here, beats me.
    Screen Shot 2014-01-15 at 8.58.36 am.png

    The first negative on the left I shot sometime back and it is securely place in my folder. The one on the right I exposed last weekend, when i developed it I thought the negative had been scratched but when i scanned it this negative had double exposure of the briefcase picture, How is this possible?

    But I am very happy with the exposure and development of the one on the right, am i rightly happy Bill?

    excuse the quality of the picture posted, i snapped it with my blackberry off the monitor.

    Cheers
    Raffay