Olympus Epic/XA4 vs high-end point and shoots

Discussion in '35mm Cameras and Accessories' started by puketronic, Nov 29, 2011.

  1. puketronic

    puketronic Member

    Messages:
    199
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I'm thinking of grabbing a 35mm and/or 28mm point-and-shoot/scale-focus cameras. The Olympus cameras seem to be the best-value. My impression is that the build, features, and maximum aperture will be inferior compared to the high-end point-and-shoots (Hexar AF, Ricoh Gr1, etc.), but optically, are they noticeably worse?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 29, 2011
  2. CGW

    CGW Member

    Messages:
    2,797
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Frankly, on a value/IQ basis, I think they were oversold. Sure, the Yashica T4, Rollei Prego, Stylus Epic beat the sox off slow zoom p&s models--what couldn't? But the Hexar and Ricoh were also wildly over-priced for what they delivered apart from looking good. At present, all these are suffering from near-cult status with the expected price boost. Problem is, the cheapies got used fairly heavily, often didn't hold up all that well, and are now tough to get fixed or find in nice shape. Who babied a cheap P&S?

    I gave up looking for an affordable Konica long ago and settled for the tiny Nikon FG and the equally teensy 50/1.8 and 100/2.8 E series lenses. Though verboten, I will say if you want a digital equivalent of the Konica/Ricoh cachet and handling, look at the Fuji X10.
     
  3. elcabezagrande

    elcabezagrande Subscriber

    Messages:
    808
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2010
    Location:
    Iowa
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    On a normal day, I would suggest going to the "Point & Shoot" subforum at rangefinderforum.com and browse through the many posted examples from dozens of low-cost alternatives to the high-end cameras so you could make your own judgement, but as rff seems to have dropped off the face of the earth, that's not such good advice today. But in my experience, the T4 and the Stylus Epic are overpriced and overhyped, they are everybody's easy answer. The best value in a 28mm film point & shoot, in my opinion, is the tiny Nikon Lite Touch AF/AF600, and there is a plethora of good performers in the 35mm range that will cost you less than $10, from Nikon, Canon, Ricoh, Pentax, Olympus, Konica and most other manufacturers. And they are cheap enough that you can buy them like candy. Unless you are a major pixel-peeper (and maybe even then), the optical quality on most of the fixed focal length cameras is almost universally very good. Find one that feels good in your hand and you will be happy.
     
  4. awwsheeet

    awwsheeet Member

    Messages:
    61
    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    i have a tvs iii and its awesome. im not sure if other are as good or not but 30-60 zoom and contax build quality rules. zeiss optics!
     
  5. puketronic

    puketronic Member

    Messages:
    199
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Thanks for the advice! I didn't believe that the differences were significant based on internet jpegs (which aren't too reliable themselves) so I wanted user confirmation. Even if the results were better, spending serious money on an auto-everything camera is just too much. I think I'll stay on the cheap-end.
     
  6. wblynch

    wblynch Member

    Messages:
    1,637
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2009
    Location:
    Mission Viejo
    Shooter:
    127 Format
    I have an Olympus Stylus Infinity and the newer Stylus Epic. Both are great and the Epic is a tiny bit better of the two but since the Infinity has not reached cult status you can get perfect ones for cheap. (There's one in the for-sale section right now for $30)

    Out in the world I like using the Infinity more since it feels stronger and operates better.
     
  7. perkeleellinen

    perkeleellinen Member

    Messages:
    2,263
    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Location:
    Warwickshire
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I have the Oly Epic (called a Mju II in Europe) and I had the Ricoh GR1s. The Ricoh produces noticeably better photos even at 5x7, I think that camera has a great lens.
     
  8. Rol_Lei Nut

    Rol_Lei Nut Member

    Messages:
    1,118
    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    Location:
    Hamburg
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I had an XA4 for a while. While the 28mm lens was o.k. sharp, it did vignette a lot and had some kind of strange distorted look to it (not classical linear distortion).

    My take is that probably any interchangeable 28mm on any M39 or M mount body would give better results.

    The Rollei 35 had a great lens (both the Tessar and the Sonnar), if you are good enough at guess focusing...
     
  9. Dr.Pain-MD

    Dr.Pain-MD Member

    Messages:
    141
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Location:
    Vancouver, C
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I have a Stylus (not Epic though) and I much prefer my XA and XA-2. The main reasons are the manual ISO selection and the manual/semi-manual focus. I don't like center-point AF which is what teh Stylus has. Also, the corner sharpness on my Stylus is pretty bad and I'm not usually one to care at all.
     
  10. blockend

    blockend Member

    Messages:
    1,752
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    Location:
    northern eng
    Shooter:
    35mm
    There may be a difference between the Olympus Epic/Mju II and the Hexar, Nikon Ti, GR1, etc, but I doubt it amounts to much, especially if you use faster film to stop the lens down. It certainly won't be reflected in the price difference. The point of compacts is they allow access to a camera all the time so you'll get the kind of shots unavailable any other way, and the smaller it is the more likely you'll be carrying the camera. If you shoot formally, you are better off with an SLR.
     
  11. thuggins

    thuggins Member

    Messages:
    457
    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2008
    Shooter:
    35mm
    The XA was the camera known as the one professional photographers carried as a backup, and the Stylus hasn't earned it's long life and good reputation by being a lemon. Either one is a great camera, but I prefer the control that the XAs give. I shoot only slide film and the exposure on all of them is always right on.
     
  12. awwsheeet

    awwsheeet Member

    Messages:
    61
    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    imnot reallly sure why i cant make for sale threads but i have a xa2 for sale if anyone wants it 35 bucks shipped.
     
  13. Les Sarile

    Les Sarile Member

    Messages:
    1,372
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Location:
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Within the confines of automatic p&s use, there is little difference between the two - Epic and 35Ti. In every other aspect, there is a world of difference commensurate with the features and price difference!

    [​IMG]
     
  14. MattKing

    MattKing Subscriber

    Messages:
    17,197
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Location:
    Delta, BC, Canada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    You need to be a paid subscriber to use the classifieds to sell things.
     
  15. Pumalite

    Pumalite Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,078
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Location:
    Here & Now
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    +1
     
  16. Pumalite

    Pumalite Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,078
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Location:
    Here & Now
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    The Ricoh 500 GX is something you have to take a look at
     
  17. darinwc

    darinwc Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,466
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2003
    Location:
    Sacramento,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    One thing to note is that the Stylus Epic usually tries to use the largest aperture available. Generally that is not optimal for any lens. Not only can the corners be softer, but that means very narrow plane of focus. Also, the flash is on by default.

    A point and shoot is a point and shoot is a point and shoot.
     
  18. perkeleellinen

    perkeleellinen Member

    Messages:
    2,263
    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Location:
    Warwickshire
    Shooter:
    35mm
    The flash default is the most annoying thing on the Oly, the markings have worn off the flash button on mine as I turn it off every time I use the camera. I get 'round the maximum aperture issue by shooting ASA800 film in daylight.
     
  19. darinwc

    darinwc Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,466
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2003
    Location:
    Sacramento,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    re: flash on by default..

    Actually that is pretty common on the AF compacts. One reason why the older ones (olympus XA, Nikon L35, Canon Af35m?) and the rangefinder compacts are nice.