One can short of a six pack?

Discussion in 'B&W: Film, Paper, Chemistry' started by shadesofgrey, Aug 27, 2005.

  1. shadesofgrey

    shadesofgrey Member

    Messages:
    82
    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Location:
    Hertfordshir
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Evening all. Paterson Universal developer. Anyone use/played with it? Asking because...1 I don't know anything about it. And...2 Today I stood next to a guy in our local camera store who did nothing but sing its praise to the rather bemused (or should that read...confused) shop assistant.

    "Great stuff! Half the price of Rodinal, goes just as far and lasts an age! Plus! No messing about mixing that archaic powder rubbish!" He said rather profoundly. Was he right? Or just right off his trolly?


    Answers on a post card please...or here if it's more convenient.

    Take care

    B.
     
  2. MikeS

    MikeS Member

    Messages:
    220
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2005
    Location:
    Newport, TN
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    I don't know anything about the developer in question, but I do know that Rodinal is NOT a powder, so I think he doesn't know what he's talking about.

    -Mike
     
  3. Paul Sorensen

    Paul Sorensen Member

    Messages:
    1,897
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Location:
    Saint Paul, MN
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Hang around a camera shop long enough and you will run into this person. These are the same interesting folks who love to chat with the clerks about how Nikon is trash, or perhaps Canon is trash, or mayby that 6MP dig slrs make better prints than LF. I am certain that Paterson Universal developer can be used to make good photos, but then so can Folgers. I automatically take anything from that kind of person with a grain of salt. There is no such thing as a perfect product for every possible use.

    Of course, I haven't used it so I guess he could be right, this is the perfect developer we have all been waiting for! :D
     
  4. Paul Sorensen

    Paul Sorensen Member

    Messages:
    1,897
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Location:
    Saint Paul, MN
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Here is what Paterson has to say. They ought to hire this guy since he is way more enthusiastic than they are about their own product.

     
  5. gnashings

    gnashings Inactive

    Messages:
    1,376
    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Location:
    Oshawa, Onta
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Those are words of wisdom - very, very true! We all see that guy in any hobby/profession, he's always around somewhere...:smile:
     
  6. dancqu

    dancqu Member

    Messages:
    3,676
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2002
    Location:
    Willamette V
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Likely of the FX-1/Beutler type film developers. Those two
    are very similar to Ansco 120 and Beer's A print developers.

    Those four developers contain no more than metol, sulfite,
    carbonate, and a bit of bromide or iodide. The last two
    I consider optional depending on the film or paper.

    Whatever is in Paterson's brew it is almost certain of
    the type I've mentioned. Those four are very active
    developers. Usually they are used more dilute with
    films then with paper. Dan
     
  7. joeyk49

    joeyk49 Member

    Messages:
    1,325
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Location:
    New Jersey,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I'm curious as to why you would need different dev times for the same type emulsion??? Would the developer work on the film at the same rate? I would think that a larger format film of the same type would simply use more chemical, but not at a faster or slower rate....

    Can someone enlighten me?
     
  8. colrehogan

    colrehogan Member

    Messages:
    2,016
    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, M
    Shooter:
    Large Format Pan
    I thought that the developer in question was being described as something that did not have to be mixed up like an "archaic powder" and also that the developer in question was half the price of Rodinal. I did chuckle at the archaic powder bit though. Funny what some people will say.