Pentax 135 F2.5 or 3.5 SUPER TAKUMAR ?

Discussion in '35mm Cameras and Accessories' started by Brad Bireley, Jan 25, 2008.

  1. Brad Bireley

    Brad Bireley Subscriber

    Messages:
    624
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Is the 135 F2.5 SUPER TAKUMAR that much better then the 135 F3.5 SUPER TAKUMAR or the 135 F3.5 SMC TAKUMAR ?
     
  2. Paul Howell

    Paul Howell Member

    Messages:
    2,808
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Location:
    Phoeinx Ariz
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Unless you need the speed once stopped down both a good performers, I have both but usually use the 3.5 as it is lighter.
     
  3. Michel Hardy-Vallée

    Michel Hardy-Vallée Membership Council Council

    Messages:
    4,350
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Location:
    Montréal (QC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    The f3.5 is wickedly sharp, dirt cheap, and uses the 49mm thread filters that are standard with most other Takumar lenses.
     
  4. Brad Bireley

    Brad Bireley Subscriber

    Messages:
    624
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Is this both versions, the super & smc ?
     
  5. Michel Hardy-Vallée

    Michel Hardy-Vallée Membership Council Council

    Messages:
    4,350
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Location:
    Montréal (QC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I've used only the SMC Tak, but on slow film it looks pretty pretty.

    Softbox + reflector. Camera on tripod, f8 or f11, Ektachrome E100G (should have used the GX instead, the subject looks a little pasty). Cheap scan from the minilab's Fuji Frontier. No PS post-processing.
     

    Attached Files:

  6. Paul Howell

    Paul Howell Member

    Messages:
    2,808
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Location:
    Phoeinx Ariz
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    The 3.5 both super and smc have 49mm filter threads, the 2.5 super is 6 elements in 6 groups the smc is 5 elements in 5 groups and has either a 55 or 58mm filter, I cant recall off the top of my head. Wide open the 2.5 is very sharp for the day, and the Dept of Feild is much better than a 180 2.0.
     
  7. Thomas Bertilsson

    Thomas Bertilsson Subscriber

    Messages:
    15,267
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I don't know about all of these lenses, but I own the 135mm f/3.5 SMC and it is a killer lens.
    - Thomas
     
  8. cao

    cao Member

    Messages:
    188
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I don't think this is quite right. As I recall, Pentax made two versions of the 135/2.5 SMC Tak. The earlier one did indeed that 5 elements, but later they switched to a six element design which some say is sharper. This is not a frequently used lens for me, so I'm merely a parrot. Somewhere out there, probably on PDML, is the serial number break where the change from five to six elements occured.
     
  9. Paul Howell

    Paul Howell Member

    Messages:
    2,808
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Location:
    Phoeinx Ariz
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I checked the Ashi Historical Group's web site, the 3.5 was only made in 5 lens in 4 elements, the 2.5 was made as 5 lens in 4 elements, and as 6 lens in 6 elements. My 3.5 is a late model super and the information that came with the lens says 5 lens in 4 elements. I was under the impression that the 135 3.5 super while multi coated but basically the same lens as late model SMC.