Photographic Expedition/ Civil Rights Workshop in Long Beach, California - WHO'S IN??

Discussion in 'Ethics and Philosophy' started by Sparky, Aug 15, 2011.

  1. Sparky

    Sparky Member

    Messages:
    2,099
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2005
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
  2. moose10101

    moose10101 Member

    Messages:
    697
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Location:
    Maryland, US
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    This statement in the article (the first sentence):

    The Police Chief of Long Beach has confirmed that his department's policy is to detain photographers who do nothing more than take pictures in public places

    is not supported by any of the quoted statements from the police chief. "Make contact" does not equal "detain". Nor is this statement supported:

    He classes photography with other "suspicious activity" such as "attempts to acquire illegal or illicit biological agent (anthrax, ricin, Eboli, smallpox, etc.)" and "In possession, or utilizes, explosives (for illegal purposes)."

    Has this PD actually detained anyone? That "article" looks like a bunch of overblown carp to me.
     
  3. Sparky

    Sparky Member

    Messages:
    2,099
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2005
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I don't know - but the fact that the article is in the public domain is worrisome - and action should be taken to expose such illegal behaviour I think...
     
  4. moose10101

    moose10101 Member

    Messages:
    697
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Location:
    Maryland, US
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I asked you if this PD detained ANY photographers, and you say you "don't know". So where's the "illegal behaviour"? Further, the quotes from the police chief don't contain anything that would back up the wild accusations made in the "article".

    And what does the article being in the public domain have to do with its veracity? Are you saying, "I saw it on the Internet, so it must be true"?
     
  5. Sparky

    Sparky Member

    Messages:
    2,099
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2005
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Because it is 'visible' and in the news media channels - people will tend to believe it. That is (to my mind) illegal behaviour - because it is a misrepresentation of civil rights and a lie. The fact that people are not educated well enough to understand this should not be the point... their best interests should be protected in ALL cases.

     
  6. moose10101

    moose10101 Member

    Messages:
    697
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Location:
    Maryland, US
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Oh, so you believe the person who published the "article" is guilty of illegal behavior for misrepresenting the policies of the Long Beach PD?
     
  7. Sparky

    Sparky Member

    Messages:
    2,099
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2005
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    enough.