printing low contrast negatives

Discussion in 'Enlarging' started by S.Frank, Dec 19, 2012.

  1. S.Frank

    S.Frank Member

    Messages:
    6
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2012
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I am seeking suggestions on printing low contrast negatives, made on TMAX film (both 400 and 100). The narrow contrast resulted from what I think was short development time at a lab. The exposures are fine. I was planning on using a VC paper, and wonder if there might be some good combinations of chemical and paper brand that someone could recommend.
    Thanks
     
  2. goldenimage

    goldenimage Subscriber

    Messages:
    144
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Location:
    North Georgi
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    hi, i shoot large format and i have several old uncoated lenses that give me low contrast negs everytime, it never fails, as far as paper goes i use the arista edu ultra because its cheap and dektol dev. the one thing i do have is a nice set of graded filters, when I start printing i will normally start with a no. 3 filter and go from there, just remember that each jump in grade after 3 you will need to double your exposure time.
     
  3. tkamiya

    tkamiya Member

    Messages:
    4,252
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2009
    Location:
    Central Flor
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    How low is low? If you intend to print in your darkroom, you could just start with using harder than usual contrast filter, say #4 or #5 and see if you can get acceptable prints.
     
  4. cliveh

    cliveh Subscriber

    Messages:
    4,625
    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    I know this doesn't answer your question about printing low contrast negs, but do you have to use a lab? The ability to develop film yourself would solve the problem.
     
  5. Thomas Bertilsson

    Thomas Bertilsson Subscriber

    Messages:
    15,108
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Just use a high contrast filter and see where it takes you.

    If exposures are 'fine' then you should have plenty of shadow detail, just not very much in terms of mid-tone and highlight contrast.

    If I may suggest using a print developer that yields higher than normal contrast - like Dektol or Ilford Multigrade. Both give higher contrast than plenty of other developers.
    If you really want to get fancy, try Versa Print II from Photographer's Formulary. It's a rather unique developer that doesn't merely increase density with prolonged developing time, the blacks keep getting blacker, but the whites stay white. That could give you a bit of an edge.

    Finally, us a condenser enlarger. They give a bit more contrast than any diffused light enlarger light source.
     
  6. Gerald C Koch

    Gerald C Koch Member

    Messages:
    5,947
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2010
    Location:
    Southern USA
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    You could also intensify the negatives which would increase their contrast and make them easier to print.
     
  7. michael_r

    michael_r Subscriber

    Messages:
    6,439
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Agree with all that's been said so far. Try the simplest approach first and progress in complexity from there if required:

    1. Try higher filters in your enlarger with standard paper developers like Dektol, LPD, etc and Ilford VC papers or maybe try Oriental VC papers
    2. Add a higher contrast developer
    3. Switch to condenser enlarger if available
    4. Intensify the negative (selenium can help a little if the negative isn't too thin, or use a formulated proportional or super-proportional intensifier)
    5. Make a contrast increasing mask or even dupe the negative to make it more contrasty (these are more complicated last resorts)
     
  8. Mark Fisher

    Mark Fisher Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,676
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2003
    Location:
    Chicago
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Ilford Multigrade has the highest contrast I've found. It is at least a grade more contrasty than Foma or Kentmere. And a condenser enlarger definitely makes a difference.
     
  9. S.Frank

    S.Frank Member

    Messages:
    6
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2012
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Thanks to everyone for the excellent suggestions. I will start with a higher filter, and see where it goes--basically, the film in question lacks a true density in the high range, but the shadow detail is very good. Probably, I will start by experimenting with Ilford multigrade and/or Oriental VC, possibly with a # 3 filter for starters. Eventually, I may make fiber prints.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 20, 2012
  10. nworth

    nworth Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,187
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Location:
    Los Alamos,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    First try the high contrast filters. You can even use a No. 47B (C5) filter to get the most from the paper. High contrast paper often doesn't give the best results, however. If you are still unhappy, try selenium toner (pretty strong, Barnbaum recommends 1+1 dilution for 15 to 20 minutes for full effect) on a negative you are not too attached to. I've seen this do wonders for flat negatives.