Revisions in "The Print" 1995 edition?

Discussion in 'Enlarging' started by eli griggs, Jul 3, 2009.

  1. eli griggs

    eli griggs Member

    Messages:
    372
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Location:
    NC
    Shooter:
    35mm
    A recent discussion about books on printmaking sent me looking through my small collection of arts related volumes, only to discover I no longer have a copy of "The Print", disappeared forever by a visiting imp or nearsighted hoodoo.

    Before I order up a gently used replacement , I'd like to ask, is there any significant differences in the materials and processes discussed between the 1982 and 1995 editions?

    Eli
     
  2. Ian Grant

    Ian Grant Subscriber

    Messages:
    18,032
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    Location:
    West Midland
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Possibly only references to available films, papers etc but I doubt anything of any importance, I have the 82 edition and every-things still relevant today.

    Ian
     
  3. RJS

    RJS Member

    Messages:
    246
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Location:
    Southern Cal
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Just about everything AA wrote is as good today as when written. Only the names have changed to protect all the deceased products!
     
  4. eli griggs

    eli griggs Member

    Messages:
    372
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Location:
    NC
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Thanks for the feedback, an '82 edition will fit in just fine with the old editions I have of "The Camera" and "The Negative".