I love shooting my FM3A, but have always been entranced by square format and german optics. Now, after years of gear fever.. I culled my gear back severely.. and really do find myself using basically a max on 3 primes.. ever. Usually on the one for months on end.. I could now see myself surving almost completely with the Nikon 85mm f/2.0 AIS.. So when it comes to MF.. I have been thinking that in reality... I probably dont need any more than the one focal length a TLR offers for my photography. So my questions are; 1) Is the current model Rolleiflex TLR 80mm really state of the art despite the camera's antique appearance? 2) Will the 80mm on 6x6 give me the same tele-compression effect as a 80mm on 35mm? 3) Will the DOF be the same as the 85mm on 35mm? Cost in not an issue, neither is versatility. Reliability is important and being relatively hassle free is why I don't feel like playing russian roulette with 2nd hand TLR's on the net. If you tell me I'm better of with a blad and 100mm lens or 6008 with Scneinder however I'm willing to listen. Daniel. PS. If there is anyone in OZ who wants to go digital for commercial reasons, I'd love to swap a 5D/135L/35L/24L/HP Design Jet for a full analog setup.