Seagull 4A-109 review

Discussion in 'Medium Format Cameras and Accessories' started by Bobby Ironsights, Oct 16, 2013.

  1. Bobby Ironsights

    Bobby Ironsights Member

    Messages:
    127
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Location:
    Thunder Bay,
    Shooter:
    35mm
    The seagull 4A-109 is the flagship of seagulls 120 rollfilm TLR's. I should know, I paid extra to make sure I bought the best.

    I bought this camera because I thought I was more open minded and well... smarter.... than your average, "This came from china so it must be garbage" old fogey. I consider myself an optimist and I thought that whatever china was putting out now with modern technology must be better than some old Yashica .with visible scratches on the lens.

    The camera safely arrived at my door and looked lovely, what with brand new lens coating on the lens and all.

    I ran three rolls of brand new film through it. One in low light and two more in overcast daylight using different apertures and speeds distances and bracketing.

    It functioned like it was a camera I made myself using only a burlap sack, cellophane and a rock.

    I now think that either whoever is making those cameras is using worn out tooling in primitive conditions, or that the seagull company is called the seagull company because it likes to sh*t on people from far away.

    Seriously, I think whoever is making cameras for the seagull company may actually bear a grudge against camera users.

    I should have bought a beat up old yashica with a scratched lens. I still would have been disappointed, but, at least then I would have known why my camera sucked. (50 years of hard use)

    The only way I see of getting acceptable pictures out of the seagull 4A-109 I bought; would be to use it as a weapon in the assault and robbery of someone taking pictures with a decent camera.

    Thanks for your time,
    Robert T.
     
  2. Ken Nadvornick

    Ken Nadvornick Subscriber

    Messages:
    4,783
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Location:
    Monroe, WA,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Ouch...

    :sad:

    Ken
     
  3. polyglot

    polyglot Member

    Messages:
    3,469
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Location:
    South Austra
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Ah yes, you should have googled for Seagull :wink: They have earned quite a reputation, entirely separate from them being Chinese.
     
  4. Newt_on_Swings

    Newt_on_Swings Member

    Messages:
    2,115
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Location:
    NYC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I am not sure how production is today, but my 4a-109 with the tessar lens is a very good camera that makes fine images. Its a bit plasticy, but all the knobs, rollers, and locks work as they should and have stayed working so far, smoothly. knock on wood. Even the hot shoe works. It has an annoying split focusing screen though. almost a horizontal type, that wants be a 45 degree type but not quite haha. Id much prefer a plain ground glass.

    I have an old yashica too, a YashicaFlex C, still a great camera to use, I bring it in to teach my classes with when we cover TLRs. The the 3 element lens on that probably is comparable to the 4 element in the seagull. Not as fast to use as the Seagull, to wind and shoot, and you have to point the face to you to look at what aperture and shutter you are choosing. The seagull has a more modern film wind and shutter cocking, and there are top viewing windows for aperture and shutter speed selection.

    Here are a few images from a roll I shot with the Seagull this summer. I dont shoot with TLRs much now, If I want 6x6 I grab my Zeiss Super Ikonta IV.
     

    Attached Files:

  5. pdeeh

    pdeeh Member

    Messages:
    2,994
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2012
    Location:
    UK
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    This review made me want one
     
  6. Roger Cole

    Roger Cole Subscriber

    Messages:
    5,206
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2011
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Why an old scratched Yashica? I paid about $150 for my Mat 124 that gets compliments everywhere for how good it looks, the lens is pristine and it works fine.
     
  7. AgX

    AgX Member

    Messages:
    11,203
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2007
    Location:
    Germany
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    A got an old Seagull rangefinder-folder and aside of lacking its rangefinder patch (mirror gone blind?, not yet opened it), it is a fine camera.
     
  8. chriscrawfordphoto

    chriscrawfordphoto Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,107
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2007
    Location:
    Fort Wayne,
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I had one about 10 years ago. It had an INCREDIBLY sharp lens and took magnificent pictures. The problem is, the shutter broke after 9 rolls of film :sad:
     
  9. R.Gould

    R.Gould Member

    Messages:
    596
    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2010
    Location:
    Jersey Chann
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    One of the first TLR's I ever owned, lovely and very sharp lens, but that was the only part of the camera that was worth having, the rest was rubbish and it lasted a week or two before needing repairs
     
  10. PKM-25

    PKM-25 Member

    Messages:
    2,004
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Location:
    Enroute
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
  11. AgX

    AgX Member

    Messages:
    11,203
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2007
    Location:
    Germany
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    There are cameras

    -) that seem real refined and well finished, but nevertheless fail soon due to some construction fault

    -) that seem were crude designed and fiinished, but still go for a very ong time

    -) that fail the more soon the more crude they look
     
  12. Maris

    Maris Member

    Messages:
    840
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    Location:
    Noosa, Queen
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I've run a Seagull 4A103A TLR for more than 20 years and it is a reliable and rock-solid performer. Even the triplet taking lens is gratifyingly sharp at f16, gratifyingly smooth at f3.5 BUT:

    I recollimated the focussing system which was remarkably erroneous ex factory.
    The wind gear has been rebuilt the way the designer intended.
    The shutter and the shutter cocking system has been tweaked into reliability.

    My impression is that the Seagull is a Rolleiflex copy made of strong but crude parts that have to be carefully bent, filed, and twisted to work properly against each other. Once done all is well. I'd say at the factory production targets probably demand that cameras are built in a hurry by people who do not check their work.
     
  13. momus

    momus Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,309
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2009
    Location:
    Lower Earth
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    How about some sample pics Robert? After that review, we're all ready.