"Second-guessing GAS

Discussion in 'Miscellaneous Equipment' started by BradleyK, Oct 6, 2013.

  1. BradleyK

    BradleyK Subscriber

    Messages:
    946
    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Location:
    Burnaby, BC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Heading out this am to do some shooting, and trying to decide on which Nikon to use, I found myself thinking back to a question I posed here some time back regarding the storage and rotation of camera bodies. When does GAS become a problem?
    Or more narrowly, how many bodies - in a particular format - is too much? The impetus? I have reached a point with my Nikons that I almost have to resort to leaving a written reminder as to when a particular body was last used! My F6 is always loaded with E100G; an F5 always has E100VS; and one of: a second F5 (x3)/F3HP(x3)/F2(x3)/F2AS(x4)/F2A(x3) will always be loaded with HP5/Tri-X.

    Why so many Nikons? I have tried to justify with a number of answers: 1). New professional 35mm SLR cameras are virtually non-existent ( i.e. so I need to make sure I don't run out (LOL)); 2). I like cameras, much like some folks like guitars or model trains, etc.,3). Prices are so low, how can any one resist a bargain ( I have picked up three F3HP bodies in the last two-and-a-half years in the sub-$100 range; one of my F5s was $212, the second was $230 and change); 4). I shoot both color and black and white - sometimes concurrently - so I need several bodies; 5). Even Nikons break down/wear out, so... and, 6)."3" allows me to try out a number of cameras that otherwise I would not have bothered with.

    All said, the issue of "too much" aside, I have, by my own admission made only one questionable purchase, camera wise: the F4s. I ran a few rolls through it, gave it away to my sister who returned it after one roll, then donated the beast to Nephew 3 who, after two years (?) has yet to even put batteries in the thing. Today he asked if I wanted it back (he prefers the F3HP I gave him).

    So...do others here ever question the size of their photographic "stash"? Any regrets? Do your "justifications" parallel mine? Do I/we have to justify why GAS leads up to make the purchases we do?
     
  2. Fixcinater

    Fixcinater Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,172
    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2008
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I've recently bought and then sold a large bit of gear. Macro set ups, flash, medium and large formats and I'm whittling it down now to the stuff that I like to use the most.

    If I had unlimited funds and space, sure, I'd keep some more of it than I am. Alas, I don't, so a bunch is moving on to new homes. I'm not much of one for triplicate backups being a valid reason for keeping it though...not to say I'm judging you on that decision, but my brain would start asking if it wouldn't make more sense to sell it now and buy it again later *if* you end up needing to.

    I get camera confused quite easily, so having more options ends up seeing me shoot less and worse than when I self impose limits of format, film, and lenses.
     
  3. rince

    rince Subscriber

    Messages:
    215
    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Location:
    Germany
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I try to keep my camera stash at one system I love in each format. Everything else I can not justify and even that is a stretch. Most of my 'regrets' I sold again. The only one big regret I still keep around is my investment in a digital setup. I have not touched it for 18 months, but I am still not quite ready of getting rid of it :wink:
    My workhorses are my Mamiya RZ and my Toyo 45, so having to finish a full roll of 36 exposures before I can change films does not apply. I usually keep 2 loaded backs for the RZ around, allowing me to change in mid shoot. In the end you have to ask yourself how much is too much. As long as you can afford them, I would say do what feels right for you and if it is one facet of keeping you excited to go out and shoot, I would say go for it. The moment all those beauties start collecting dust in the shelf, it might be time to see if your money is still invested good in gear you don't use.
     
  4. benjiboy

    benjiboy Subscriber

    Messages:
    8,541
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2005
    Location:
    U.K.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I have five Canon FD S.L.R. bodys,(3 new F1's, an EF, and a T90) and two Mamiya T.L.R 6X6 bodys (C330F) and a set of lenses all of which that I use almost every day especially since I retired I've owned the vast majority of my equipment for more than 30 years. I realized many years ago that having more equipment than you actually use on a regular basis is counter productive because it's the more you have to protect, insure, maintain, and worry about.
     
  5. Rick A

    Rick A Subscriber

    Messages:
    7,420
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2009
    Location:
    northern Pa.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    So much cool gear, so little time, and theres only one of me. That being said, I've gotten rid of most of my gear and shoot mostly LF. I keep some 35mm and MF gear for those times I feel like doing snap shots, which is getting rarer as time goes by.
     
  6. Jeff Kubach

    Jeff Kubach Member

    Messages:
    6,930
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Location:
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    +1

    Jeff
     
  7. summicron1

    summicron1 Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,946
    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    Location:
    Ogden, Utah
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    i recently went to an estate sale where the folks had been serious collectors of fine porcelain and german beer steins -- they had $40,000 worth of statuettes on a table left by this couple who, being dead, no longer needed them and their kids were stuck selling them for 30 cents on the dollar -- porcelain doesn't re-sell for what it cost.

    i went home wondering, do i really need all these cameras? I mean -- 4 Leica SLRs is a bit much, not to mention 3 Ms, 5 Barnacks and a massive Nikon systems....

    Getting rid of all that is another matter. At least my sons say they appreciate the stuff, but I am slowly weeding...
     
  8. BradleyK

    BradleyK Subscriber

    Messages:
    946
    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Location:
    Burnaby, BC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Not having any children (or even a wife for that matter), I had never really considered the inheritance issue. I do, however, have a niece and two nephews that I have introduced to film photography (via gifts of Nikon F2 and F3 bodies) whom I frequently take out on my shooting excursions around the Lower Mainland and to Vancouver Island. I would love to be the proverbial fly on the wall when it comes time for them to divvy up the stuff! LOL
     
  9. Sirius Glass

    Sirius Glass Subscriber

    Messages:
    20,586
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Location:
    Southern California
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Switch to Hasselblad then you only need one camera body & system and as many film backs as film types you would use. Plus spare backs.

    When you have the best, you will not need more.
     
  10. ArtO

    ArtO Member

    Messages:
    263
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Location:
    Florida
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Have one with 2 backs and both 80mm and 150mm lenses. Enough? No way. I'd love to get hold of a 40 or 50mm lens and maybe an additional body maybe a 503C, a prism finder, and at least two more backs. BUT I'm waiting for my ship to come in.

    I'd like an F6 Nikon too and also an FM3a.
     
  11. laroygreen

    laroygreen Member

    Messages:
    71
    Joined:
    May 8, 2011
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    My biggest regret is that where I live, it isn't easy to sell your regrets :D . I had to give away my digital system (2 bodies, lenses, flashes) as it just wasn't being used and I didn't want it to break so I gave it to someone who needed it a lot more than I did.

    For me, I came to the conclusion last year that photography is my hobby, and it gives me the most joy other than family and friends, so I don't need to justify spending on it once I can afford it (buying something and affording something is 2 different things). I gladly make a lot of personal sacrifices to support my lifestyle, and though my camera collection is only 3 cameras (4x5, 6x7, 35) - all of which were bargain basement prices when I got them; I do spend a lot more money on props, lighting, grip, film and processing than on cameras (thankfully I have all the lights and grips that I need, but film and processing costs will unfortunately keep rising).

    Some people spend money traveling, some on clothes, some on gambling, some on drugs, some on their cars, some on their houses and we choose to spend ours on photography; as long as you can meet your obligations and no part of your life is suffering because of it, and you enjoy it, then there is no reason to feel guilty about anything. Life is just too damn short for that!
     
  12. flatulent1

    flatulent1 Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,342
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Location:
    Seattle USA
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    When I could afford it I had no problem accumulating all sorts of gear, including multiple bodies of one model that I really enjoy using. Especially when they're going for fire-sale prices. Now that money is more of an issue for me I've been selling off gear that I don't use, with further whittling down to come. I've decided there are some EOS bodies I simply can NOT do without (RT, 7NE, 1V), the Contax gear is staying with me come hell or high water, and the FD gear will never go on the block because I have so many really fine lenses.

    I can't bring myself to sell off the Minolta gear because I really love the XD-11, though I haven't used any of it for a few years. I've shot one roll through my RB in the last year, and it should go, but I really want to give it a good workout first. I haven't used the Pro TL for quite a while, though I don't know why not; it's a great system, and if I had to keep only one system I'm afraid that'd be the one.

    I did manage to sell my Nikon gear a few years ago, but reacquired an N80 recently because I missed it and I really LIKE that camera. I also managed to donate about 2/3 of my P&S collection, but have kept far too many and need to do some further weeding.

    But I've sure enjoyed trying out all the different gear, even if it has cost me more than it's been worth.
     
  13. John_Nikon_F

    John_Nikon_F Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,920
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Location:
    Duvall, WA,
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Depending on how the F performs when it arrives next week, I may not be buying any more in the way of bodies. I've a decent condition F5, a pretty nice F4 that's coming back to roost, a real clean F3P, and a decent condition F2AS. A year or two ago, I started rotating bodies. Shoot one for a week or two, then go to the next one, do the same, and just keep going that way. Prevents each body from sitting on a shelf for too long. I've also come to the realization that I don't need to spend cash on Nikkormats (as good of a camera as they are - I just don't need a bunch of them for $60) or other lower end bodies, now that I have pretty much what I want. I will, however, continue to work on the glass arsenal, picking up deals along the way (like the 35/2 Nikkor-O that I got for $40 shipped, or the 300/4.5 EDIF AIS that I'm picking up for $58, etc)...

    -J
     
  14. Sponsored Ad
  15. MattKing

    MattKing Subscriber

    Messages:
    16,830
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Location:
    Delta, BC, Canada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    John:
    Shall we keep track, and quote this back to you in the future :whistling:?
     
  16. Pioneer

    Pioneer Member

    Messages:
    1,726
    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Location:
    Elko, Nevada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I have some wonderful gear but over the years I have accumulated too much. Except for my Pentax K1000 and Minolta SRT 102, if it doesn't say Zeiss, Ansco, Agfa or Voigtlander on it somewhere it is going. That Pentax and Minolta, along with two or three select lenses, have too much history to go.
     
  17. John_Nikon_F

    John_Nikon_F Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,920
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Location:
    Duvall, WA,
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Matt, of course. I will give prior warning to any mention, as well. ;-P :crazy:

    -J
     
  18. flatulent1

    flatulent1 Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,342
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Location:
    Seattle USA
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I'm thinking of using it as my sig here. :laugh:
     
  19. John_Nikon_F

    John_Nikon_F Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,920
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Location:
    Duvall, WA,
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Go for it. ;-P

    -J
     
  20. Klainmeister

    Klainmeister Member

    Messages:
    1,492
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Location:
    Santa Fe, NM
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    Are you looking to take pictures or looking to play with different camera bodies. Although they aren't mutually exclusive, it definitely is cheaper to pic one or the other. I currently own 7 cameras after playing with probably close to 30. At this point though, I just want to take pictures and be consistent, so I've settled on what I have and am focusing on my images more than gear. It's quite liberating and I spend a lot less time on the web play shopping.
     
  21. Sirius Glass

    Sirius Glass Subscriber

    Messages:
    20,586
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Location:
    Southern California
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    When pigs fly. We heard that from you before.
     
  22. ArtO

    ArtO Member

    Messages:
    263
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Location:
    Florida
    Shooter:
    Multi Format

    Both. At least that's the answer for me. Adjusting from system to system can be tough at times but it has the advantage that it makes you slow down and think about what you're doing. I love playing with cameras that are "new" to me. And I love photography. If I'm going for a must have shot, I'll grab one of my Nikons -- most times an F4S or an F3 or an...
     
  23. John_Nikon_F

    John_Nikon_F Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,920
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Location:
    Duvall, WA,
    Shooter:
    35mm
    [​IMG]
     
  24. David T T

    David T T Member

    Messages:
    24
    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2012
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I got GAS once when I was playing guitar more often, then got cured and sold everything except one electric, one acoustic, and one amp. I coveted C lenses for my RB67, but I'm pretty much covered with a 65, 90, 127, 180, and 250. Then there's my XA for 35mm. Done.
     
  25. benjiboy

    benjiboy Subscriber

    Messages:
    8,541
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2005
    Location:
    U.K.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    You have to decide in the final analysis if your raison d'être is making photographs or buying more or more photographic equipment, I discovered more than 25 years ago that creativity wasn't a problem that could be solved by acquisition, and since this realization I have found my photography much more productive and satisfying.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 18, 2013
  26. BradleyK

    BradleyK Subscriber

    Messages:
    946
    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Location:
    Burnaby, BC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Point taken benjiboy. But if you notice in the OP, my remark referred to bodies, not equipment, generally. In my case, with the exception of the 17-35mm ED, 28-70mm ED and the 80-200mm D ED lenses (all purchased to use with - primarily - my d*&^#@l), I have not added any lenses, or any other "do-dads" to my kit for the better part of five years. Bodies, however (blame, in part, must rest with the give-away prices) are another matter entirely! LOL