Simple question: time and "stops"

Discussion in 'Enlarging' started by JeffD, Feb 27, 2005.

  1. JeffD

    JeffD Member

    Messages:
    308
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    Probably and easy question:

    How do I figure out how to add a third of a stop to a particular amount of time (keeping fixed aperature)?

    For instance, if I want to add 2/3 a stop to 19 seconds of time, how do I determine that?

    I know adding a stop doubles the time, it is the 1/3 and 2/3 increases that I'm not sure how to figure out properly..
     
  2. JeffD

    JeffD Member

    Messages:
    308
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format

    That sounds about right. But, doesn't exposure increase at a non arithmetic fashion? In otherwords, isn't 2/3 a stop actually more than 2 * 7 seconds?

    Or, maybe I'm confusing something I have read.

    Short times it probably doesn't matter much at all, but I am trying to think through a reciprocity problem.
     
  3. Donald Miller

    Donald Miller Member

    Messages:
    6,242
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    Using your example. One stop would be 38 seconds total time. One third stop additional would be 25.3 seconds total time. Two thirds stop addtional would be 31.6 seconds.

     
  4. Flotsam

    Flotsam Member

    Messages:
    3,221
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2002
    Location:
    S.E. New Yor
    There are a couple of good F stop printing charts available on the internet too. I keep one on my darkroom wall.
     
  5. MurrayMinchin

    MurrayMinchin Membership Council Council

    Messages:
    4,196
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Location:
    North Coast,
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    Hi Jeff, are there any simple questions?

    My method is to use percentage increases/decreases. A one stop increase of exposure for 19 seconds is a 100% increase; 38 seconds. A 1/3 stop increase would be 19 seconds + 33%, 0r 25.27 seconds...I'd round it up to 26 seconds.

    This way, if at a later date you're making a larger print of the same image and want to burn the sky the same way, you just apply the original percentage increase to your new exposure for the larger print.

    Murray
     
  6. rjr

    rjr Member

    Messages:
    409
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Location:
    Mosel, SW Ge
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
  7. Bruce Osgood

    Bruce Osgood Membership Council Council

    Messages:
    2,612
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2002
    Location:
    Brooklyn, N.Y.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    From Ed Buffaloes' page on test exposure for printing, I think principle is the same for camera exposure increases:

    BASE 19.0
    PLUS------Net change---new exp
    1/4 STOP----0.19--------22.6
    1/2 STOP ----0.41--------26.8
    3/4 STOP----0.68--------31.9
    1 STOP--- --1.00--------38.0

    http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/TestExpo/testexpo.html

    The queston was about 1/3 stop increase and my answer is about 1/4 stop increases but for greater detail on the reasoning please see Ed Buffaloes' site, he explains it all much better than I can.
     
  8. Bruce Osgood

    Bruce Osgood Membership Council Council

    Messages:
    2,612
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2002
    Location:
    Brooklyn, N.Y.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    OOPS,

    My colulmn titled Net change should be titled MULTIPLIER and the numbers should be expressed as 1.19; 1.41; 1.68 and 2.00.

    I was once told by a boss that you can make all the mistakes you want as long as you keep them on your desk. Sorry this got off.
     
  9. oriecat

    oriecat Member

    Messages:
    243
    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2004
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I was reading in my Way Beyond Monochrome book about f/stop printing, but it went way over my head at the time. Does anyone have a good basic link that I could start with to try and get into this?
     
  10. Kevin Caulfield

    Kevin Caulfield Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,392
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Location:
    Melbourne, A
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    As I understand it, to calculate new times, you need to raise the number 2 to the power of the number of stops.

    Therefore, for a 19 second exposure, one stop increase would be 2 to the power of 1, which is 2, and 2 x 19 is 38s.

    For a 1/3 stop increase, 2 to the 1/3 = 1.2599
    1.2599 x 19 = 23.94s

    For 2/3 stop, 2 to the 2/3 = 1.5874
    1.5874 x 19 = 30.16s
     
  11. KenM

    KenM Member

    Messages:
    800
    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2003
    Location:
    Calgary, Alb
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    If your calculator doesn't handle raising numbers to fractional exponents, you can use the log function to caculate the same thing:

    You want to find z = 2 ^ (2/3). Tough to do, but easy with the log function:

    log( z ) = (2/3) * log( 2 )
    log( z ) = 0.20068...

    Then, take the inverse log of 0.20068, and you get:

    z = 1.58740...

    Then, 19 * z gives you 30.16s. You can use this method to determine any fractional stop exposure change. I used the log function which determines logarithms based on '10' - the ln function determines logs based on 'e'. You can use either log function for this task, as long as you're consistent.
     
  12. Bob F.

    Bob F. Member

    Messages:
    3,984
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2004
    Location:
    London
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Kevin & Ken above give the real mathematical deal - if you have a calculator/computer available, use their equations.

    Easier to do sans calculator is to add 25% for +1/3 stop & 60% for +2/3 stop (or subtract 20% for -1/3 stop & subtract 40% for -2/3 stop).

    So, 19 secs + 1/3 stop = 19+5(ish)=24 secs. 19 secs - 2/3 stop = 19-8(ish)=11 secs. Not exact, but close enough for most practical purposes.


    Cheers, Bob.
     
  13. JeffD

    JeffD Member

    Messages:
    308
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    That is good info. I wonder what the multiplier is for 1/3 stops?

    I am realizing that and additional 2/3 stops worth of time is different than 2 * (1/3 stops worth of additional time).

    Maybe I am nitpicking.

    Thanks for all the answers!
     
  14. Kevin Caulfield

    Kevin Caulfield Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,392
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Location:
    Melbourne, A
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    It's what I posted above. The multiplier for 1/3 stop is 1.26, and for 2/3 stop it is 1.59.

    So, Bob's advise above to use 25% for one stop and 60% for two stops is spot on (near enough!!).
     
  15. Kevin Caulfield

    Kevin Caulfield Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,392
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Location:
    Melbourne, A
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Oops, I meant "advice" not "advise".
     
  16. smieglitz

    smieglitz Member

    Messages:
    1,941
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Location:
    Climax, Michigan
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    A very quick and dirty way to do this and get in the ballpark is to reference the standard ISO progression of films. As an example using 20 seconds (ISO 20) one-third up would be 25 seconds (ISO 25) and + 2/3 stop would get you to 32 seconds (ISO 32). If you had a 12.5 second print (think ISO 125) 1/3 up would be 16 seconds (think ISO 160) 2/3 up would be 20 seconds (think ISO 200).

    So, if you memorize the ISO sequence of film speeds, you can relate it to exposure times as well. Since every third number in the sequence doubles, the entire sequence can be derived from just remembering 3 of the ISO speeds. For example, if you can remember ISO 100 (TMX), ISO 125 (Plus-X) and ISO 160 (Portra) you can generate:

    ...25, 32 , 40 , 50, 64 , 80 , 100, 125 , 160 , 200, 250 , 320 , 400 ...

    The jump from 25 to 32 is 1/3 stop just as the jump from 2.5 to 3.2 would be 1/3 stop.