time or VAPUG.ORG?

Discussion in 'Ethics and Philosophy' started by argus, Feb 18, 2006.

  1. argus

    argus Member

    Messages:
    2,146
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Vintage Analog Photography Users Group. :wink:
    Jim Gali might become the first member of honour.

    I'm only getting this into the ballpark because of some recent threads and/or images in the galleries.

    Some people like old lenses, cameras, enlargers... but sometimes I really can't appreciate the quality of the result produced with vintage equipment.

    I'm not trying to condemn the use of old equipment or people who use it (got several 1900 lenses myself). I was a professional flute player (in a former life...) and was (still am) interested in 18th and 19th century instruments with 1 up to 9 of more keys, but my maine concern has always been: can we get better results that what was possible at the time the vintage item was produced?

    Keep shooting, starting as from now.

    fact #1: it's just great fun using those items. (as I do)

    G
     
  2. df cardwell

    df cardwell Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,341
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Location:
    Dearborn,Mic
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Wooden flute, silver flutes, gold flutes... amplified flutes.
    Ancient music played with contemporary technique. The possibilities are endless.

    The parallels are exact between music and photography.

    I prefer the sound of a wooden flute. I like english horns. Baroque fiddles. I use vintage lenses with contemporary technique to make a clear and rich picture ( I hope ) without a 'commercial look' unavoidable - to my eye - with new lens designs.

    . It's all one.

    But VAPUG ? Oh, dear.

    .
     
  3. 127

    127 Member

    Messages:
    581
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2004
    Location:
    uk
    Shooter:
    127 Format
    One of the great things about film cameras is that with the advances in film technology, vintage equipment quite catagorically can and does produce (technically) better images now than they did when they were made...

    Ian
     
  4. David A. Goldfarb

    David A. Goldfarb Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    17,943
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2002
    Location:
    Honolulu, Ha
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    Yes, I think we can do some interesting things with old lenses and new films and materials, and more importantly, a different sense of history and experience than existed when these old lenses and such were the only things available. I think it makes a difference that we might use an old lens by choice rather than by necessity. It puts more of a creative burden on the photographer to use old technology in an interesting way and to identify what in particular is interesting about it.

    For instance, I think we're using the big old portrait lenses with much shorter DOF and much closer subject distances than was common in the 19th and early 20th century.

    Another big difference--for better and for worse--is that hand retouching of negatives is much less common than it used to be. "For better" because faster films and strobes have eliminated the need for retouching to conceal subject movement, and because aesthetic sensibilities have changed so that maybe we don't feel we need to hide the "faults" of the classic lenses. "For worse," because we're losing part of the traditional craft. I've been trying to recover some of the old techniques, and I look at old photographs in new ways as a result.
     
  5. waynecrider

    waynecrider Member

    Messages:
    2,297
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2003
    Location:
    Floriduh
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Isn't it all VA now with the advent of digital? If not, it probably will be in 5 years.
     
  6. cao

    cao Member

    Messages:
    188
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Indeed. Way too close to "vapid" for my taste.