Tmax 400 accidently shot at 100

Discussion in 'B&W: Film, Paper, Chemistry' started by markrewald, Oct 23, 2005.

  1. markrewald

    markrewald Member

    Messages:
    139
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    Location:
    Aurora, Co
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Hello!

    I accidently shot a roll of Tmax 400 at 100. I use D-76 and Rodinal as my developers.

    Can someone tell me some development times for D-76 for this mistake?
     
  2. fhovie

    fhovie Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,250
    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Location:
    Port Hueneme
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    cut your normal d-76 time by 25% and you should be close.
     
  3. Les McLean

    Les McLean Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,609
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Location:
    Northern Eng
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Reduce normal development by 25 to 30% and the negs will be fine
     
  4. Paul Sorensen

    Paul Sorensen Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,898
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Location:
    Saint Paul, MN
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    And pay attention to what you are doing next time Mark! :D

    I agree that your negs will be fine with a little less development, they would be surprisingly good with normal development. By the way Mark, you should always listen to Les, if you are nice I will loan you his book some time.

    Paul.
     
  5. titrisol

    titrisol Member

    Messages:
    1,671
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    Location:
    Rotterdam
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Actually over exposing those 2 stops is not bad. You'll probably get finer grained negatives.
    Underdeveloping for 30% should work fine.
     
  6. Terrance Hounsell

    Terrance Hounsell Member

    Messages:
    71
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Location:
    Mount Pearl.
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    You've actually only over exposed by 1 stop because TMY is really a 200 ISO anyway. You were lucky because with over exposure TMY will look good but with underexposure it is nearly useless. TMY does not suffer under exposure well. Agree with the range of percentage increase in development times given; anywhere between 0-30% will work. Personally I would go with 10-15%.
     
  7. JeffD

    JeffD Member

    Messages:
    308
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    Funny you should bring this up- I was up late last night testing TMAX400 to get my personal film speed. I actually rate TMAX 400 at 50 (!). So, in my darkroom, you'd find you have underexposing a stop!

    This is based on some film tests I did to get a zone 1 exposure equal to .1 density over fb+f. I am using HC110 H dilution (twice as dilute as B), in a jobo drum on a Beseler roller.

    Seems odd to rate it so low, but I don't care. I know I'll get detailed shadows. I guess I could rate it at 400, and put my shadows on zone III or IV.

    If I rate at 400, and put shadows on zone II, there is not much density there on the negative to print...

    TMAX 100 I rate at 32, using the above developing routine and zone 1 density target.
     
  8. Loose Gravel

    Loose Gravel Member

    Messages:
    921
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2003
    Location:
    Santa Barbar
    Mark

    I'll bet these will be your best negs ever and that you will be changed always.