I shot a concert last week using Tri-X at 1600. It was indoors with typical stage lighting. I spot metered off the performers' faces (for most shots). I normally soup my negs in XTOL, but I also don't normally push Tri-X to 1600. You guys think XTOL or Diafine (which is the other dev I have around) would be better? Normally, when I plan on using Diafine, I expose at 1250, so film exposed at 1600 might not be the best. However, there are two things of note: 1 - Concert lighting is pretty contrasty lighting - Diafine might do better at 1600 in this situation? or no? 2 - Some shots might be over exposed - when I entered the pit and didn't have time to meter before each shot for changing light, I put my camera on manual and preset the exposure for the largest exposure (slowest shutter, largest aperture) that I remembered using before hand - to err on the side of over exposure. Not sure if this makes a huge difference, but how overexposed would a frame have to be to have blocked up highlights due to pushing in XTOL? Just curious to see what you guys think. Thanks!