Urban studies

Discussion in 'Architecture' started by michael_r, Jun 30, 2010.

  1. michael_r

    michael_r Subscriber

    Messages:
    6,542
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Any thoughts welcome.

    Note these are not scans. They are digital photos of the original prints. The original prints are tack sharp obviously with far more detail, including highlight and shadow detail not evident in these files. I'm still struggling with how to properly "digitize" my prints for either web or CD etc. It's frustrating.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. michael_r

    michael_r Subscriber

    Messages:
    6,542
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Just looked at the attachments, and I guess if anyone is going to look at them, best to view them in "original size". When I look at them at the reduced size that automatically comes up in the small window that opens up, they look all crappy and pixelated. Geez I really need to figure out the electronics. Sorry about that.
     
  3. fotch

    fotch Member

    Messages:
    4,824
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2005
    Location:
    SE WI- USA
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Almost any scanner can scan prints and do pretty good. Better would be scan the negative with something like an Epson 700. Best would something like a negative or slide only scanner like one of the Nikon's.
     
  4. michael_r

    michael_r Subscriber

    Messages:
    6,542
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    The issue I have with scaning negatives is the prints require extensive darkroom manipulation. Scanning the negative means I have to start from scratch and create a fine print using software. As a darkroom practitioner, I have zero desire make my prints that way.
     
  5. stradibarrius

    stradibarrius Member

    Messages:
    1,382
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Location:
    Monroe, GA
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I have an Epson factory refurbed, V500 flatbed scanner that I use to scan my negatives and prints and it does a good job. Less than $200.00 at the Epson store. The V700 is a nicer scanner but also more $$$. Hope it helps.
     
  6. Axle

    Axle Member

    Messages:
    543
    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2010
    Location:
    Milton, ON
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Ignoring the technical aspects of the digitization for a moment (I often have to remind myself not to look at that solely but look at the actual photo).

    The third one is my favourite and IMHO the strongest. I like how clean it is, simple lines, nice straight lines with a single diagonal shadow as contrast (both for being black and being on angle to oppose the straight).