Using Ilford Direct Positive Paper

Discussion in 'Pinhole Photography' started by jeffreyg, May 26, 2012.

  1. jeffreyg

    jeffreyg Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,377
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    Location:
    florida
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I have been really enjoying my entry into the world of pinhole photography. I am using the Ilford Titan with HP5 and Delta 100 depending on the weather; measuring the exposure with a Gossen Ultra Pro with incident readings (box speed) and converting with the Ilford exposure calculator. The film is developed in ID11 1:1 for the mfg recommended time @68F. Although I have only made 16 exposures so far and printed 4 in pt/pd all have been right on. I made a home-made "viewfinder" that has also worked very well.

    My question is... I have seen a number of references to pre-flashing the direct positive paper. Why? Or would that be determined by expecting a particular lighting situation? If so, what conditions?

    Thanks in advance for your input.

    http://www.jeffreyglasser.com/
     
  2. Roger Hicks

    Roger Hicks Member

    Messages:
    4,913
    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Location:
    Northern Aqu
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    Flashing reduces contrast (maybe 1 paper grade) and increases speed (maybe 2x).

    Cheers,

    R.
     
  3. Steve Smith

    Steve Smith Subscriber

    Messages:
    9,082
    Joined:
    May 3, 2006
    Location:
    Ryde, Isle o
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    It does for negative paper and film but is it still true when applied to direct positive?

    Steve.
     
  4. Joe VanCleave

    Joe VanCleave Member

    Messages:
    613
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Location:
    Albuquerque,
    Shooter:
    Pinhole
    Yes, I always preflashed direct positive paper. I've found for my process that the Harman Direct Positive FB paper requires about half the preflashed exposure that I would normally give grade 2 paper negatives.

    Conversely, the Efke RC direct positive paper, that came out a year or two ago, required much longer preflashed times than I would normally give paper negatives, almost 4x the value.

    So obviously I had to figure out these preflashed times for myself.

    How I determine the required amount of preflashed time is to set up the darkroom in the daytime, pour up the standard chemicals, set up a scene outdoors with which to photograph, and do a series of exposures with varying preflashed times. After development, the prints are examined when fully dry and the optimal print reveals the best preflashed time. Of course, you do this only after already having figured out, via a similar calibration test, what your working Exposure Index will be for the paper. I rate the Harman Direct Positive FB paper at ISO 1.6; others report slightly different values, which is okay. The important thing is being able to do your own testing, to arrive at what exposure times work best for you.

    -Joe