when in doubt

Discussion in 'Miscellaneous Equipment' started by jnanian, Mar 13, 2010.

What do you do, when in doubt?

  1. over expose over develop ?

    3 vote(s)
    5.3%
  2. under expose over develop?

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. under expose under develop?

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. over expose under develop?

    13 vote(s)
    22.8%
  5. over develop?

    5 vote(s)
    8.8%
  6. under develop?

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. over expose?

    21 vote(s)
    36.8%
  8. under expose?

    2 vote(s)
    3.5%
  9. flash my film?

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. nothing / i'm zone'd out ...

    13 vote(s)
    22.8%
  1. jnanian

    jnanian Advertiser Advertiser

    Messages:
    19,990
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2003
    Location:
    local
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    i always over expose and over develop ...

    what do you do ?



    over expose over develop ?
    under expose over develop?
    under expose under develop?
    over expose under develop?
    over develop?
    under develop?
    over expose?
    under expose?
    flash my film?
    nothing / i'm zone'd out ...

    sorry the poll didn't work out
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 13, 2010
  2. chriscrawfordphoto

    chriscrawfordphoto Member

    Messages:
    1,179
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2007
    Location:
    Fort Wayne,
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I'm never in doubt. I use a spotmeter and develop according to the light conditions, I'm never wrong when I do that.
     
  3. Mike1234

    Mike1234 Inactive

    Messages:
    1,884
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Location:
    South Texas,
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    What Chris said.

    However, if I were to be doubtful of exposure and tonal range I would overexpose and underdevelop. But... I plan to print digitally so these errors are easily corrected. If printing analog there may not be a paper grade capable of correcting gross development errors.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 13, 2010
  4. mike c

    mike c Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,280
    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Have been over exposing slightly and using shorter development times,have had a condenser enlarger.Bought a cold light enlarger head and now using box speed asa and longer development times,seems to be working still working on it.
     
  5. David A. Goldfarb

    David A. Goldfarb Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    17,943
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2002
    Location:
    Honolulu, Ha
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    I'm never in doubt, but occasionally in error, so the exposure is the exposure. From there I might adjust development plans, if I catch it in time, or I might intensify the neg, or I might just chalk it up to experience and print something else, or if it's something I really need to be able to print and won't have a chance to reshoot and the other methods aren't sufficient, and there's at least something on the neg, then I might try something better discussed on APUG's sister site, http://www.hybridphoto.com .
     
  6. SuzanneR

    SuzanneR Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    5,888
    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I tend to overexpose and under develop... just a bit of each. Unless it's that moment when the sun has just dipped below the horizon (or it's a cloudy day) and the light's flat, then I underexpose, and overdevelop... just a bit! I rarely shoot box speed, but sometimes I'm zoned out, too, and I'm not sure what I'm doing!!
     
  7. MattKing

    MattKing Subscriber

    Messages:
    16,820
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Location:
    Delta, BC, Canada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Depends which film.

    If unsure, and it is negative film, I'll add an additional shot with more exposure.

    If unsure, and it is transparency film, I'll add an additional shot with a half shot less exposure.

    Matt
     
  8. Sirius Glass

    Sirius Glass Subscriber

    Messages:
    20,584
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Location:
    Southern California
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Use box speed. Check readings with a Nikon F100 as a spot meter. Maybe bracket. Process normally.
     
  9. Ian Grant

    Ian Grant Subscriber

    Messages:
    18,038
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    Location:
    West Midland
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    This poll must have the most choices possible of any so far on APUG but the option I need is absent :D

    Guestimate, just few times I've been caught with a flat battery or forgotten the meter etc on a shoot & had to rely on instinct, as a teenager one of my Uncles would challenge me to guess the exposure and we'd be quite close most of the time.

    The other important option that's missing is bracket when in doubt.

    But better no meter & be in doubt than first forgetting a camera, and then leaving the film behind as well, I've been there when that's happened, and I was the subject (not the photographer) being photographed in the landscape :D No names he's an APUG member :D :D :D

    Ian
     
  10. Mike1234

    Mike1234 Inactive

    Messages:
    1,884
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Location:
    South Texas,
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    Evryone maks miskates.
     
  11. RalphLambrecht

    RalphLambrecht Subscriber

    Messages:
    8,213
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Location:
    Florida
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    The aim is to be accurate with film exposure and development, knowing that there is some exposure latitude to compensate for error and variation. You can get away with underdevelopment far more easily than with overdevelopment, and you can get away with extreme overexposure better than with slight underexposure. Print quality actually improves with modest film overexposure but is very sensitive to underexposure.
    Overdeveloped negatives will not print easily, but minute underdevelopment is easily corrected with a harder grade of paper. Film exposure latitude is what you can get away with, but when in doubt, overexpose and underdevelop.
     
  12. jnanian

    jnanian Advertiser Advertiser

    Messages:
    19,990
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2003
    Location:
    local
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    ian

    i wanted more options but 10 was the limit!
    guestimate was one of my original choices
    as well as " hey, i ordered a sandwich " but
    i had to prune the tree :wink:

    john
     
  13. Jesper

    Jesper Subscriber

    Messages:
    744
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    Sweden
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    When I am uncertain I take another exposure.
    It is better to waste film than images.
     
  14. Sponsored Ad
  15. Rick A

    Rick A Subscriber

    Messages:
    7,419
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2009
    Location:
    northern Pa.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I dunno, all those years shooting a C-3 without a light meter, I dont trust any meter fully, I just shoot what I think is right, and develope accordingly. I get it right 95% of the time. Sunny 11 and the rest be danged!

    Rick
     
  16. paulie

    paulie Member

    Messages:
    266
    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    i overexpose and pull slightly , it helps to keep strong black borders in my contact prints
     
  17. 2F/2F

    2F/2F Member

    Messages:
    8,003
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Location:
    Los Angeles,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I am never in doubt when I have a light meter.

    If not, and I am really in doubt, I will guess, and if using transparency film, and the photo will allow it, I will bracket.

    I don't bracket often with negative film. I will generally guess, with a lean to the side of over exposure.

    The contrast of the light I shot in, not how I exposed the pix, usually determines what I do with development.
     
  18. 2F/2F

    2F/2F Member

    Messages:
    8,003
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Location:
    Los Angeles,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Actually, what you describe as "print quality" might not match the definition of another person for a particular print. A quality print to me is one that looks like I want it to look. This may or may not look like the formula that people often state to describe a "quality print". Sometimes overexposing the film will help to achieve this. Sometimes normally exposing the film will do so. Sometimes underexposing the film will do so.

    Without first defining your criteria for "print quality" (not the criteria for it), what you have said is nothing but a statement of opinion as a general fact. I know what you meant by your statement. However, instead of "improves", why not just objectively describe what it is exactly that overexposure does to a negative and to a print, and let us decide on a case-by-case basis if this will "improve" our print?
     
  19. KWhitmore

    KWhitmore Member

    Messages:
    510
    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Location:
    Montreal
    Shooter:
    35mm
    overexpose and overdevelop...always rather have something than nothing. (by the way I'm nearly always in doubt...keeps me on my toes?) :smile:)
     
  20. RalphLambrecht

    RalphLambrecht Subscriber

    Messages:
    8,213
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Location:
    Florida
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    You said it very well yourself!
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 13, 2010
  21. jovo

    jovo Membership Council Council

    Messages:
    4,124
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2004
    Location:
    Jacksonville
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Like David, I'm never in doubt, but sometimes in error. I think VC paper is the analog version of photoshop, and most small mistakes can be rectified with it. It's been a loooong time since I've made a negative that I can't print with some degree of success.
     
  22. jnanian

    jnanian Advertiser Advertiser

    Messages:
    19,990
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2003
    Location:
    local
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    i'm with you kate!

    im not in doubt very often but have grown accustom to
    over developed and over exposed film, it is my "normal" exposure these days :smile:

    john
     
  23. Christopher Walrath

    Christopher Walrath Member

    Messages:
    7,114
    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2005
    Location:
    In a darkroo
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I am SELDOM in doubt. I can muddle through anything though. I generally tend towards underexposure to gain slightly more contrast in negative film and print it up a bit.
     
  24. BetterSense

    BetterSense Member

    Messages:
    3,126
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Location:
    North Caroli
    Shooter:
    35mm
    When in doubt, overexpose and overdevelop. This is what I would do for a photo of important documentary value. There's a reason the old WWII photos are always a nice crispy chalk-and-soot tonality. Expose "enough" and develop generously was probably the method.
     
  25. Vaughn

    Vaughn Subscriber

    Messages:
    5,305
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Location:
    Humboldt Co.
    Shooter:
    8x10 Format
    I would over-develop. Which really is not "over" develop, but just developed longer until the film is properly developed. I always develop my negs quite a bit more than "normal" -- sometimes for twice the "normal" amount. They are still not "over-developed", but developed just right so that I get easy to print 8x10 negatives for carbon printing.

    I make mistakes, but someday maybe I'll have an assistant I can blame everything on.

    Edited to add: Looks like what I wrote is gibberish, where is an assistant when one needs one?!
     
  26. Anon Ymous

    Anon Ymous Member

    Messages:
    1,480
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2008
    Location:
    Greece
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Ideally, I'd chose overexposure and underdevelopment, but being a 135 user, that's not always possible. Therefore, I voted overexpose. A bit more exposure with normal development won't really hurt, but overdevelopment is too bad IMHO.