Which manual Nikon to purchase next?

Discussion in '35mm Cameras and Accessories' started by Mike Kennedy, Dec 11, 2008.

  1. Mike Kennedy

    Mike Kennedy Member

    Messages:
    1,595
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Location:
    Eastern Cana
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I just love my F3hp and was wondering which full manual Nikon to look into next.Suggestions?
     
  2. Mick Fagan

    Mick Fagan Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,114
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Location:
    Melbourne Au
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Whilst I also run F3HP bodies plus an FE2, I have often thought if a late model FM2 happened along, I would snap it up.

    Mick.
     
  3. Uhner

    Uhner Member

    Messages:
    1,101
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    FM2 is a nice camera, and I particularly like the light meter, but I am even more fond of the F2…
     
  4. Mike Kennedy

    Mike Kennedy Member

    Messages:
    1,595
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Location:
    Eastern Cana
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I sold my FM2n because I didn't like the meter system.Love my FE & FE2.
    Shall check into the F2.
     
  5. Mike Kennedy

    Mike Kennedy Member

    Messages:
    1,595
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Location:
    Eastern Cana
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Hummm.
    F2,F2A,F2AS,F2SB

    How to choose?
     
  6. Pinholemaster

    Pinholemaster Member

    Messages:
    1,504
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Location:
    Westminster,
    Shooter:
    8x10 Format
    Get more lenses first.
     
  7. 2F/2F

    2F/2F Member

    Messages:
    8,003
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Location:
    Los Angeles,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    If you love it so much, why don't you marry it?

    Seriously speaking, if you are happy with the camera, I'd just get a duplicate camera. Makes things very easy. I love my pair of F-1s and my pair of FTb-QLs. Using either pair is always a bit easier than using one of each; nothing to remember to do differently when going from one to the other.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 11, 2008
  8. Ralph Javins

    Ralph Javins Member

    Messages:
    832
    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2008
    Location:
    Latte Land,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Good morning, Mike;

    You did say "fully manual." I agree with Uhner; the Nikon F2.

    The variations you will find are mainly in the metering on top of the body. You can change the metering, or just use a waist level, magnifier, or pentaprism finder with the body. It is the last hand assembled Nikon 35 mm camera. It does not require a battery (you did say "fully manual"). They can be repaired. I like mine, although I do use my Minoltas more often. Something about the Nikkor lenses focusing "backwards" for me.
     
  9. uwphotoer

    uwphotoer Member

    Messages:
    59
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    Location:
    Piedmont, NC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    The Nikon F2 is a great choice.... I think I have 6..... some have bad shutters but I really like the camera.... what makes them all different is the meter you put on them..... I have mostly non-AI lenses so I really like my F2S.
     
  10. eskyone

    eskyone Member

    Messages:
    310
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Location:
    Escanaba Mic
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Mike, it depends on what you might be shooting and under what conditions. for myself, my F3 wasn't cutting it in the cold. I need knobs (shutter dial) so I could it with cold weather gloves on. I also needed something that was weather resistant. To my point, it depends on you usage. I found the f4s did meet my needs, and is a great manual camera. Batteries last fairly well in the cold as well. I really liked the F3 and HP version is even better. The film advance lever is silky smooth. - Sean
     
  11. André E.C.

    André E.C. Member

    Messages:
    1,520
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Location:
    Finland
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    The F2 it's an awesome piece of equipment, I like mine with a regular prism finder from the F.

    Did I mention the F's and F2's are fully compatible in screens and finders?:D


    Cheers


    André
     
  12. Uhner

    Uhner Member

    Messages:
    1,101
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Mike, I might add that if you don’t like the meter on the FM2 – you will probably not like the meter read out on the F2 A2 or the SB.
     
  13. narsuitus

    narsuitus Member

    Messages:
    814
    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    “I just love my F3hp and was wondering which full manual Nikon to look into next.”

    It depends on why you want another body.

    If you just need another body to use, I would simply get another F3.

    If you want to add it to a collection of “full manual” Nikons, here is what I would choose in order of priority:

    1. Nikon SP rangefinder
    2. Nikon F2 titanium
    3. Nikon F2
    4. Any other Nikon rangefinder
    5. Nikon FM3a
    6. Any other Nikon FM except FM-10
    7. Nikon F
    8. Nikon FM-10
     
  14. Sponsored Ad
  15. Chaplain Jeff

    Chaplain Jeff Member

    Messages:
    172
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    Hello,

    What do you want your next body to do that the F3 doesn't? That's the question that needs to be answered.

    If you like the F3 and want another like it, get another F3.

    The FA and F4 will matrix meter your manual Nikkors. That's an advantage.

    The TTL on the F4 is far more advanced than the F3's first-generation flash technology.

    The FM family are less expensive / just-as-durable backup bodies for the F3, if that's all you're wanting.

    Some prefer the FE2 to the FM family. That's always an option. Stay away from the original FE - their SS viewfinder indicators are connected to the shutter speed dial with a single thread that is prone to break - mine has multiple times).

    The F2 (or even an F) will give you similar pro options to the F3 without the need for batteries - and have a completely mechanical shutter.

    The list goes on and on.
     
  16. nicefor88

    nicefor88 Member

    Messages:
    249
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Location:
    Bruxelles, B
    Shooter:
    35mm
    FM/FM2 for full manual or older F2, F or FE/FE2 when you want to concentrate on focusing and composition then using the aperture priority. I've used all of these with great satisfaction.
    I'm a F3 buff anyway so I advise this wonderful camera everytime I can...
     
  17. glockman99

    glockman99 Member

    Messages:
    138
    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2009
    Location:
    Aberdeen, WA
    Shooter:
    35mm
    The only "full manual" Nikons that I can think of are the F2 series and FM series. (My 2 F3HP cameras are not "full manual".).

    If you can get by with a Nikon that requires batteries, you might want to take a look at the FA.
     
  18. denmark.yuzon

    denmark.yuzon Member

    Messages:
    116
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    San Pedro, L
    Shooter:
    35mm
    i agree with the FA.. it has matrix metering.. goes up to 1/4000th of second shutterspeed.. i myself is look for one.. next to my FM2n.. but if you want all mechanical tank.. i would go with the F2.. one of my dream cameras..
     
  19. stealthman_1

    stealthman_1 Member

    Messages:
    91
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2008
    Location:
    Northern Cal
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I really like my FA, I shoot it more than any other Nikon film camera (and I have a few...:rolleyes:smile:. But, if I wasn't shooting it, my choice for manuals is almost always my F2A. Like that camera a lot.
     
  20. Coffeehound

    Coffeehound Member

    Messages:
    55
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Location:
    Chillicothe,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I've had a F2a for almost 31 years. I could take it out tonight and run a roll through it and still get acceptable images. It is very tired, and in need of a complete overhaul.
    In 1983 I flew to Panama for military training. During the flight some how the meter switch was left on and on arrival I found the batteries had died. Fellow soldiers laughed that I was "not going to get picture" because of "without batteries how" type of thinking.
    I shot film for two weeks before getting to town to buy some batteries... every image that I shot came out. I think I shot some HP4 - Pan F or something that was a 72 exposure roll....
    SO.. for complete manual control I stick with the F2 series and just remember the "Sunny 16 rule"....

    Jacqueline
     
  21. elekm

    elekm Member

    Messages:
    2,056
    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Location:
    New Jersey (
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    So, the question becomes, if you want similar/identical performance, get another F3.

    If you want a lighter-weight camera, then look at the FM series. If you want something larger and all-manual, then perhaps the Nikkormat FT3.
     
  22. Les Sarile

    Les Sarile Member

    Messages:
    1,362
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Location:
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Here are your Nikon choices from 1959 -1979 and 1980 - 1990

    If you pick up an FM3a then that is like getting the best of both the FM2 and FE2 + additional features and it would be newer by almost 20 years so you can expect it to last that much longer.
     
  23. John_Nikon_F

    John_Nikon_F Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,951
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Location:
    Duvall, WA,
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Since you say that you don't like the FM series style of metering, but like the FE2 metering, then you'll want either a Photomic or an F2A. The F2SB and F2AS have the same meter readout as the FM2/FM2n. The F2S is just like an F3, but visible in the dark, readout-wise. Although, the shutter speed is indicated by a mechanical disk that rotates with the shutter speed dial, like on other F2 bodies.

    Personally, I found that I prefer the F2AS/FM2 readout over the F3's, but don't like how some FM2n's tend to develop a twitchy meter as they age. I know that F2AS's can sometimes develop the same issue as their resistance elements go bad. That said, I also really like the F4's meter readout. The bar-graph display is quite nice compared to the "+-" of the F3/F2S or the "+0-" of the FM series and the F2AS/SB. A lot like a meter needle, but visible in darkness.

    -J
     
  24. Les Sarile

    Les Sarile Member

    Messages:
    1,362
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Location:
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Shooter:
    35mm
    BTW, you can't fully share TTL flashes between an F3 and any other Nikon due to the proprietary mount unless you get the usually very expensive Nikon AS-17. So getting another F3 is not a bad option.
    Getting the FM2/FE2/FA/FM3a gets you a smaller lighter body with higher flash sync speed and higher shutter speeds - and other features as already mentioned.
    Nikon's smallest slr - the FG (EM/FG/FG20 lineup) is worth a look see.
     
  25. cjbecker

    cjbecker Member

    Messages:
    796
    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2010
    Location:
    IN
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    I use a FE and wow is that thing a beauty, so effortless to use. It does have a new shutter, which was put in 20 years ago. But I would recommend just getting another of the same body.
     
  26. juan

    juan Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,748
    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Location:
    St. Simons I
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Your brain is a better meter than anything mechanical. Get an F and think.
    juan