Who/Which company is your favorite photography website designer?

Discussion in 'Presentation & Marketing' started by haring, Oct 13, 2012.

  1. haring

    haring Member

    Messages:
    138
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Who/Which company is your favorite photography website designer?
     
  2. Slixtiesix

    Slixtiesix Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,097
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2006
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
  3. BradleyK

    BradleyK Subscriber

    Messages:
    943
    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Location:
    Burnaby, BC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    +1 for Ilford; our friends at Freestyle have a well-designed site as well. In terms of websites selling equipment, I would give a nod to KEH, Adorama and B&H. Easy to navigate and the search functions in each work well when one is just meandering through...
     
  4. ME Super

    ME Super Member

    Messages:
    1,225
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2011
    Location:
    Central Illinois, USA
    Shooter:
    35mm
    B&H for film, KEH for gear. Ilford's site is nicely set up too.
     
  5. MattKing

    MattKing Subscriber

    Messages:
    16,800
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Location:
    Delta, BC, Canada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I have the funny feeling that most people are missing the word "designer" at the end of the title to this thread :smile:.
     
  6. ME Super

    ME Super Member

    Messages:
    1,225
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2011
    Location:
    Central Illinois, USA
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Does it count if someone else comes up with the design on paper and provides me with the graphics and then I implement it with HTML, CSS and Javascript? If so then I nominate... Me!! :blink::whistling:
     
  7. David Brown

    David Brown Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,595
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2004
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Oh, good. I thought it was just me. :blink:
     
  8. TheFlyingCamera

    TheFlyingCamera Membership Council Council

    Messages:
    9,435
    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I'm very interested in the answers to the actual question because I'd like to redesign my site as well, and while I've got the technical chops to implement it, I don't have the graphic design talent to do all the graphics pieces. It's kinda like porn - can't define it (good design) but I know it when I see it.
     
  9. BradS

    BradS Subscriber

    Messages:
    4,219
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Location:
    S.F. Bay Area
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    I do loathe any and all use of shockwave/flash....I also abhor sites that open a new tab or window every time I click on a link! Awful!
     
  10. Patrick Robert James

    Patrick Robert James Subscriber

    Messages:
    624
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2012
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    The problem with graphic designers is that they will usually design a website that shows off their skills when what you really need is a website that shows off your photographs. Those are two different things. Less expensive/experienced designers typically want to throw everything at it to show off their skills. I am not a designer, but I have designed websites in the past, some pretty nice ones too (breaks own arm on back) but not for a long time and I think it is about as exciting to do as watching paint dry (I've done that too so I know). I have been lucky to have been around some pretty good designers though over the years and things tend to rub off a little for one with an inquisitive mind.

    If you are looking for a super straight website there are a few options out there that are pretty flexible. Indexibit is one. There are others that run off of Wordpress as well. Some companies have Flash based interfaces but all the websites done on them tend to look (except for colors and fonts) and function exactly the same. I personally think for the purposes of an art photographer who wants to reach the most people a simple HTML website is the best. My own website I think is a good example of a simple one even if it may be a little "vanilla", but the point of it is to show the images without distractions. It should work on any computer or device and fit on nearly any screen. I pared it down over the years to eliminate anything that anyone could find annoying, I think... It is just HTML with frames and tables, Google fonts, and mostly controlled by CSS. It is due for a major update as the newest image on it is 5 years old but I think the design still holds up fine due to the minimalism of it. Anyway, here it is, as simple as it can be-

    http://www.patrickrobertjames.com/